CONFLICT MANAGEMENT BETWEEN PUBLIC AND THE GOVERNMENT IN THE CASE OF CONSTRUCTION OF THE PRA CANAL WATER GATE PROJECT UNDER THE ROYAL INITIATIVE IN PHANANG TUNG SUBDISTRICT, KHUAN KHANUN DISTRICT, PHATTHALUNG PROVINCE

Abstract

This study aims to achieve three objectives: 1) to examine the conditions and factors that cause conflict between the public and the government in the case of the construction of the Pra Canal Water Gate Project under the Royal Initiative in Phanang Tung Subdistrict, Khuan Khanun District, Phatthalung Province; 2) to analyse the characteristics of the conflict resolution between the public and the government; and 3) to propose appropriate strategies for managing the conflict between the public and the government in such projects. This research employed a qualitative approach through in-depth interviews with key informants, including stakeholders involved in the project, such as community leaders, local protest leaders, representatives of civil society, independent organisations, regional government agencies, and local government units, totaling 24 individuals. Purposive sampling was employed in this study, focusing on the selection of key informants who possess relevant knowledge, experience, and direct involvement in the case under investigation. Phenomenology was used as the primary method for analyzing the collected data. The study found that the conflict arose from the public's concerns about the potential impacts on the environment, lifestyle, society, and culture of the community. Additionally, the lack of transparency in the project implementation, the concealment of information, and the absence of public participation contributed to the tension. Public attitudes towards corruption in the government and the failure of previous projects in the area further fueled the conflict. Furthermore, the project was proposed from the central government, and the approach to problem-solving did not align with the community's needs, resulting in negative impacts on the community. This led to continuous protests by the public against the project. Although the community's proposal to halt the project gained support, it was difficult to achieve success. The findings from this study can serve as a guide for managing conflicts between the public and the government in future projects that have environmental and community impacts.