INTEGRATING TAM WITH MARKETING INNOVATION: THE CASE OF CRLAND IN CHINA’S REAL ESTATE SECTOR

Main Article Content

Wang Qiu
Chanta Jhantasana
Charcrit Sritong

Abstract

As digital transformation in real estate accelerates, innovative marketing is vital for influencing consumer adoption of property platforms. This research examines the impact of digital marketing (DM), personalized services (PS), and experiential marketing (EM) on user acceptance, grounded in the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM). A survey was conducted with 400 CRLand platform users across five Chinese cities. The model includes seven constructs: DM, PS, EM, Perceived Usefulness (PU), Perceived Ease of Use (PEOU), Attitude Toward Use (ATU), Behavioral Intention (BI), and Actual System Use (ASU). Data analysis with PLS-SEM via ADANCO evaluated reliability, validity, and model fit (SRMR, HTMT, R², Q²). Findings show EM significantly influences PU (β=0.960, p<0.001), whereas DM and PS do not. PEOU strongly predicts ATU (β=0.959, p<0.001), which, in turn, affects BI (β=0.911) and ASU (β=0.762). Some TAM relationships, such as PU → ATU and PU → BI, were not supported, potentially due to multicollinearity between PU and ATU (HTMT > 0.85). These findings extend TAM by showing that experiential engagement plays a more influential role in property technology adoption than traditional digital marketing. As a result, immersive and user-centered experiences emerge as critical drivers of consumer acceptance, suggesting that real estate firms should prioritize technologies such as VR/AR and intuitive platform design. Furthermore, the limited support for several traditional TAM relationships indicates that technology adoption models may require contextual adaptation when applied to high-stakes and emotionally involved purchase decisions.

Article Details

Section
บทความวิจัย

References

Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T

Bhattacharya, J., Davis, F. D., & Venkatesh, V. (2004). Toward preprototype user acceptance testing of new information systems: Implications for software project management. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 51(1), 31–46. https://doi.org/10.1109/TEM.2003.822464

Chen, Z.-T., Shi, G., & Zheng, Y.-H. (2025). From virtual experience to real action: Efficiency–flexibility ambidexterity fuels virtual reality webrooming behavior. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2), Article 148. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020148

CRLand. (2024). Sustainability report 2024. https://www.crland.com.hk

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Deep, S., Vishnoi, S., Malhotra, R., Mathur, S., Yawale, H., Kumar, A., & Singla, A. (2023). Influence of augmented reality and virtual reality on real estate investment decisions: Understand consumer perspective in Indian AEC industry. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 32(2), 1122–1140. https://doi.org/10.1108/ECAM-04-2023-0327

Gefen, D., Karahanna, E., & Straub, D. W. (2003). Trust and TAM in online shopping: An integrated model. MIS Quarterly, 27(1), 51–90. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036519

Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 43(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8

Ibrahim, F. A., Ishak, N., Woon, J. K. Y., Boying, W., Shafiei, M. W. M., Ismail, R., & Razak, R. A. (2023). Virtual technology (VR) attractiveness attributes in influencing house buyers' intention to purchase. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 29(2), 126–134. https://doi.org/10.37934/araset.29.2.126134

Li, G. Q., & Zhang, T. J. (2022). The historical evolution and social effects of China's housing system. Sociological Research, 37(4), 1–22.

Liu, L. (2023). How to take advantage of live streaming to enhance consumers' impulsive purchasing behavior: Evidence from China. Academic Journal of Humanities & Social Sciences, 6(12), 27–38. https://doi.org/10.25236/AJHSS.2023.061204

Manzoor, U., Baig, S. A., Hashim, M., & Sami, A. (2020). Impact of social media marketing on consumers' purchase intentions: The mediating role of customer trust. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Research, 3(2), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.31580/ijer.v3i2.1349

Mauri, M., Rancati, G., Riva, G., & Gaggioli, A. (2024). Comparing the effects of immersive and non-immersive real estate experience on behavioral intentions. Computers in Human Behavior, 152, Article 107996. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107996

McLean, G., & Wilson, A. (2019). Shopping in the digital world: Examining customer engagement through augmented reality mobile applications. Computers in Human Behavior, 101, 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.07.002

Pine, B. J., & Gilmore, J. H. (1999). The experience economy: Work is theatre & every business a stage. Harvard Business School Press.

Reinartz, W., Wiegand, N., & Imschloss, M. (2019). The impact of digital transformation on the retailing value chain. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(3), 350–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2019.03.002

Saleem, M. F., Asim, M., & Chandio, J. A. (2022). Effect of augmented reality advertising on purchase intention. Journal of Marketing Strategies, 4(1), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.52633/jms.v4i1.127

Sihi, D. (2018). Home sweet virtual home: The use of virtual and augmented reality technologies in high involvement purchase decisions. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 12(4), 398–417. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-02-2018-0027

Sun, C., Ye, C., Li, C., & Liu, Y. (2023). Virtual ideality vs. virtual authenticity: Exploring the role of social signals in interactive marketing. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 430–445. https://doi.org/10.1108/JRIM-01-2023-0011

Sun, Y., Lu, Y., Wang, B., & Fan, W. P. (2023). Like being there: How the soft VR technology could change consumers' initial decision-making. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, Article 107814. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107814

Ullah, F., Sepasgozar, S., & Ali, T. H. (2019, December 7). Real estate stakeholders technology acceptance model (RESTAM): User-focused Big9 disruptive technologies for smart real estate management [Conference presentation]. 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Development in Civil Engineering, Jamshoro, Pakistan. https://doi.org/10.26190/unsworks/27517

Vargo, S. L., & Lusch, R. F. (2004). The four service marketing myths: Remnants of a goods-based, manufacturing model. Journal of Service Research, 6(4), 324–335. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670503262946

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2012). Adoption and impacts of interorganizational business process standards: Role of partnering synergy. Information Systems Research, 23(4), 1131–1157. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.1110.0404

Venkatesh, V., Brown, S. A., Maruping, L. M., & Bala, H. (2008). Predicting different conceptualizations of system use: The competing roles of behavioral intention, facilitating conditions, and behavioral expectation. MIS Quarterly, 32(4), 483–502. https://doi.org/10.2307/25148853

Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478. https://doi.org/10.2307/30036540

Verhoef, P. C., Broekhuizen, T., Bart, Y., Bhattacharya, A., Dong, J. Q., Fabian, N., & Haenlein, M. (2021). Digital transformation: A multidisciplinary reflection and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 122, 889–901. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.022

Yu, B., & Fan, F. (2023). Generation Z's response to the virtual reality advertising in China. Young Consumers, 24(3), 367–377. https://doi.org/10.1108/YC-07-2022-1558

Zhou, J., & Ye, T. (2021). Measurement of the impact of the Chinese real estate market on

economic growth and employment. China Banking Research, 73, 73–82.003