The Effect of Using Collaborative Strategic Reading Integrated with Gamification on Learners’ Reading Comprehension Ability and Learning Motivation
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
This research aimed to: 1) investigate the differences in learners’ reading comprehension ability before and after using Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR) integrated with gamification, and 2) investigate the differences in learners’ learning motivation before and after using CSR integrated with gamification. The sample consisted of 22 Grade 10 learners at Tanangnaewwittayayon School, Waeng Noi District, Khon Kaen Province, selected through cluster random sampling. The study employed a pre-experimental one-group pretest–posttest design. Quantitative data were collected using six lesson plans based on CSR principles, integrated with gamification elements; a reading comprehension test measuring two dimensions (interpretation and expansion); and a learning motivation questionnaire assessing intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. The findings indicated that overall reading comprehension and learning motivation both improved significantly after the instructional intervention, with large-to-very-large effect sizes across all dimensions. These results confirm that CSR, integrated with gamification, effectively enhanced both reading comprehension and motivation to learn among Grade 10 EFL learners.
Keywords: Collaborative Strategic Reading (CSR), Gamification, Reading Comprehension, Learning Motivation, EFL Learners
Article Details
อนุญาตภายใต้เงื่อนไข Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เอกสารอ้างอิง
Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khaled, R., & Nacke, L. (2011). From game design elements to gamefulness: Defining gamification. In Proceedings of the 15th International Academic MindTrek Conference: Envisioning Future Media Environments (pp. 9–15). ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040
Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational strategies in the language classroom. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511667343
Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2011). Teaching and researching reading (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.
Hamari, J., Koivisto, J., & Sarsa, H. (2016). Does gamification work? A literature review of empirical studies on gamification. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 525–533. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.11.055
Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (1991). Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning (3rd ed.). Prentice Hall.
Kapp, K. M. (2012). The gamification of learning and instruction: Game-based methods and strategies for training and education. Pfeiffer.
Klingner, J. K., & Vaughn, S. (1998). Using collaborative strategic reading. Teaching Exceptional Children, 30(6), 32–37. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005999803000606
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., Dimino, J., Schumm, J. S., & Bryant, D. (2001). Collaborative strategic reading: Strategies for improving comprehension. Teaching Exceptional Children, 34(1), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1177/004005990103400106
Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Boardman, A. (2015). Teaching reading comprehension to students with learning difficulties (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
Landers, R. N. (2014). Developing a theory of gamified learning: Linking serious games and gamification of learning. Simulation & Gaming, 45(6), 752–768. https://doi.org/10.1177/1046878114563660
Nation, I. S. P. (2019). Teaching ESL/EFL reading and writing (2nd ed.). Routledge.
Okkinga, M., van Steensel, R., van Gelderen, A. J. S., van Schooten, E., Sleegers, P. J. C., & Arends, L. R. (2018). Effectiveness of reading-strategy interventions in whole classrooms: A meta-analysis. Educational Psychology Review, 30(4), 1215–1251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-018-9445-7
Pallant, J. (2020). SPSS survival manual: A step by step guide to data analysis using IBM SPSS (7th ed.). Open University Press.
Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26–56. https://doi.org/10.1191/0265532203lt243oa
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2017). Self-determination theory: Basic psychological needs in motivation, development, and wellness. Guilford Press.
Sailer, M., Hense, J. U., Mayr, S. K., & Mandl, H. (2017). How gamification motivates: An experimental study of the effects of specific game design elements on psychological need satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 69, 371–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.12.033
Vaughn, S., Martinez, L. R., Linan-Thompson, S., Reutebuch, C. K., Carlson, C. D., & Francis, D. J. (2011). Enhancing social studies vocabulary and comprehension for seventh-grade English language learners: Findings from two experimental studies. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4(3), 210–242. https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2010.537757
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 420–432. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. R., & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3), 190–195. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12184
