Main Article Content
Engaging young people in environmental sustainability is a promising approach for fostering positive development among youth and communities. The purpose of this research was to examine the impact of Native American youth engagement in environmental sustainability in Coconino County. This qualitative case study focused on how a social cognitive theory influences Native American youth engagement in environmental sustainability. The results found that personal (values and attitudes), behavioral (learnings and lifestyles), and environmental (green space and environment stewardship) were the underlying themes associated with engagement of Native American youth in environmental sustainability in Coconino County which has a relatively large Native American population. In turn, the Native American youth who were given early exposure to place-based and environmental education had a positive impact on environmental sustainability in their community. This paper offered some psychosocial and behavioral science implications as well as recommended further investigation on indigenous youth engagement in social and environmental soundness.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Bandura A (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Bandura, A. (1982). Self-efficacy mechanism in human agency. American Psychologist, 37(2), 122-147. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.37.2.122
Bandura, A. (1989). Human agency in social cognitive theory. American Psychologist, 44, 1175-1184.
Balis, T., & Postolache, T. T. (2008). Ethnic Differences in Adolescent Suicide in the United States. International Journal of Child Health and Human Development: IJCHD, 1(3), 281–296.
Basiago, A. D. (1999). Economic, Social, and Environmental sustainability in Development Theory and Urban Planning Practice. The Environmentalist, 19(2), 145-161.
Browne, L, P., Garst, B, A., & Bialeschki, M. D. (2011). Engaging Youth in Environmental Sustainability: Impact of the Camp 2 Grow Program. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 29(3), 70-85.
Bureau of Indian Affairs (2014). Federal Register. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from http://www.loc.gov/catdir/cpso/biaind.pdf
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Coconino County Administration Office (2017). History of Coconino. Coconino, AZ. Retrieved May 15, 2017 from http://www.coconino.az.gov/427/History-of-Coconino
Ellis, J. M., & Caldwell, L. L. (2005). Increasing youth voice. In P. A. Witt & L. L. Caldwell (Eds.), Recreation and Youth Development (pp. 281-299). State College, PA: Venture Publishing.
Evans, S. D., & Prilleltensky, I. (2007). Youth and democracy: Participation for personal, relational, and collective well-being. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(6), 681-692. doi: 10.1002/jcop.20172
Gary, F. A., Baker, M., & Grandbois, D. M. (2005). Perspectives on suicide prevention among American Indian and Alaska native children and adolescents: a call for help. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 10(2), 6. doi: 10.3912/OJIN.Vol19No02HirshPsy01
Garroutte, E. M., Goldberg, J., Beals, J., Herrell, R., & Manson, S. M. (2003). Spirituality and attempted suicide among American Indians. Social Science Medicine, 56(7), 1571–1579. doi: 10.1016/S0277-9536(02)00157-0
Hart, D., & Atkins, R. (2002). Civic competence in urban youth. Applied Developmental Science, 6(4), 227-236. doi: 10.1207/S1532480XADS0604_10
Haynie, D. L., Silver, E., & Teasdale, B. (2006). Neighborhood characteristics, peer networks and adolescent violence. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(2), 147-169. doi: 10.10 07/s10940-006-9006-y
Johnson, L. R., Johnson-Pynn, J. S., Sweeney, S. S., & Williams, C. T. (2009). Youth civic action: Going green, going global. Ecopsychology, 1(2), 75-84. doi: 10.1089/eco. 2009.0007
Knoester, C., & Dana, L. H. (2005). Community context, social integration into family and youth violence. Journal of Marriage and Family, 67(3), 767-780. doi: 10.1111/j.17 41-3737.2005.00168.x
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-273. doi: 10.1111 /j.1746-1561.2004.tb08283.x
Meinhold, J. I., Malkus, A. J. (2005). Adolescent environmental behaviors. Can knowledge, attitudes, and self-efficacy make a difference? Environment and Behavior, 37(4), 511-532. doi: 10.1177/0013916504269665
Navajo Nation Government (2017). Federal Register. Retrieved May 15, 2017 from http://www.navajo-nsn.gov/
Rushing, S. N. C., Hildebrandt, N. L., Grimes, C. J., Rowsell, A. J., Christensen, B. C., & Lambert, W. E. (2017). Healthy & Empowered Youth: A Positive Youth Development Program for Native Youth. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 52(3), S263-S267. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.024
Sawitri, D. R., Hadiyanto, H., & Hadi, S. P. (2015). Pro-environmental Behavior from a SocialCognitive Theory Perspective. Procedia Environmental Sciences, 23, 27-33.
Schusler, T. M., & Krasny, M. E. (2010). Environmental action as a context for youth development. Journal of Environmental Education, 41(4), 208-223. doi: 10.1016/ j.proenv.2015.01.005
Shochet, I. A., Dadds, M. R., Ham, D., & Montague, R. (2006). School connectedness is an underemphasized parameter in adolescent mental health: Results of a community prediction study. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 35(2), 170-179. doi: 10.1207/s15374424jccp3502_1
Stake, R. E. (2006). Multiple case study analysis. NY: Guilford Press.
Tabernero, C., & Hernandez, B. (2010). Self-efficacy and intrinsic motivation. Environment and Behavior, 43(5), 658-675. doi: 10.1177/0013916510379759
Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research. Los Angeles, Calif: SAGE Publications.
Thurber, C. A., Scanlin, M. M., Scheuler, L., & Henderson, K. A. (2007). Youth development out comes of the camp experience: Evidence for multidimensional growth. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 36(3), 241-254.
UNESCO (2017). What do we mean by “youth”? Retrieved April 19, 2018 from http://www.unesco.org/new/en/social-and-human-sciences/themes/youth/youth-definition/#topPage
United Nations (2002). Indigenous peoples. Retrieved May 15, 2017, from http://undesadspd. org/indigenouspeoples.aspx
United Nations. (2012). World population monitoring: Adolescents and youth. Retrieved April 17, 2018, from http://www.un.org/en/development/desa/population/ publications/pdf/ fertility/12_66976_adolescents_and_youth.pdf
Volk, T. L., & Cheak, M. J. (2003). The effects of an environmental education program on students, parents, and community. Journal of Environmental Education, 34(4), 12-25. doi: 10.1080/00958960309603483
Witherspoon, D., Schotland, M., Way, N., & Hughes, D. (2009). Connecting the dots: How connectedness to multiple contexts influences the psychological and academic adjustment of urban youth. Applied Developmental Science, 13(4), 199-216. doi: 10.1080/10888690903288755
World Bank (1986). Environmental Aspects of Bank Work. The World Bank Operations Manual Statements, OMS 2.36. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Yazan, B. (2015). Three approaches to case study methods in education: Yin, Merriam, and Stake. The Qualitative Report, 20(2), 134-152. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova. edu/tqr/vol20/iss2/12
Yohalem, N., & Martin, S. (2007). Building the evidence base for youth engagement: Reflections on youth & democracy. Journal of Community Psychology, 35(6), 807-810. doi:10.1002/jcop.20180
Yin, R. K. (2009). Doing case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.