Active Learning and its Outcomes: A Case Study from the Education Reform Project in Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
Success in terms of life and career requires 21st century skills. Curriculum reform in education requires enhancing student competencies and an application of learning strategies and skills to drive the achievement of national policy. Active learning plays an important role to enhance student learning. This qualitative research, conducted in Thailand, aimed to achieve three objectives: (a) to understand learning management with active learning; (b) to study the learning outcomes of students after participating in the active learning classroom; and (c) to identify the guidelines for active learning management. The case study approach was used in this research. Fourteen primary and secondary schools in the north of Thailand participated in the project of the “Education Reform Lab and the Coaching Lab”. School directors, teachers, and students were among the three groups of key informants. Data collection was conducted using in-depth interviews, story-telling and observations, and content analysis was done to analyze the data. The results revealed the following:(a) active learning classrooms could operate using problem-based learning, project-based learning, and scaffolding; (b) the students were able to achieve three learning outcomes: motivation, attitude, and skills; and (c) the learner analysis and the knowledge to utilize active learning techniques were among the best practices for teachers. The practical implications of the findings and some issues covering the social and cultural contexts were proposed. The further studies should be needed to expand to other regions in Thailand were also discussed.
Downloads
Article Details
References
Al-Balushi, S. M., & Al-Aamri, S. S. (2014). The effect of environmental science projects on students’ environmental knowledge and science attitudes. International Research in Geographical &Environmental Education, 23, 213–227.
doi: 10.1080/10382046.2014.927167
Barrett, T. (2017). A new model of problem-based learning: Inspiring concepts, practice strategies and case studies from higher educa tion. Maynooth: AISHE.
Baysal, Z. N. (2017). The problem-based learning process: Reflections of pre-service elementary school teachers. Educational Research and Reviews, 12(4), 177-188.
Bayer, T. J. (2016). Effects of guided project-based learning activities on students’ attitudes toward statistics in an introductory statistics course (Doctoral dissertation). Old Dominion University, Virginia.
Bonwell, C. C., & Eison, J. A. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom. Washington, DC: Education Resource Information Center (ERIC).
Karaçalli, S., & Korur, F. (2014). The effects of project-based learning on students’ academic achievement, attitude, and retention of knowledge: The subject of ‘electricity in our lives’. School Science and Mathematics, 114(5), 224–235.
ChanLin, L. J. (2008). Technology integration applied to project-based learning in science. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 45(1), 55-65. doi:10.1080/14703290701757450
Christiansen, E., Kuure, L., Morch, A., & Lindstrom, B. (2013). Problem-based learning for the 21st century: New practices and learning environments. Aalborg: Aalborg University.
Cordingley, P., & Buckler, N. (2012). Mentoring and coaching for teachers’continuing professional development. In Fletcher, S. J. & Mullen, C. (Eds) (pp. 215-227). Mentoring and coaching in education. London: The sage publicaiton.
Delaney, H. (2019). Education for the 21st century: Placing skills development at the heart of Education, Unicef. Retrieved from www.unicef.org/thailand/stories/education-21-century.
Demirci, C. (2017). The effect of active learning approach on attitudes of 7th Grade students. International Journal of Instruction, 10(4), 129-144.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1994). Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Dole, J. A., Hacker, D. J., & Nokes, J.D. (2007). Teaching high school students to use heuristic while reading historical texts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(3), 492-504.
Dole, S., Bloom, L., & Doss, K. K. (2017). Engaged learning: Impact of PBL and PjBL with elementary and middle grade students. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2). Retrieved from https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol11/iss2/9/
Gallagher, S. (1997). Problem based learning: Where did it comes from, what does it do and where it is going? Journal of Education of the Gifted, 20(4),332-362.
Henard, F., & Roseveare, D. (2012). Fostering quality teaching in higher education: Policies and practices. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Hsu, P. S., Van Dyke, M., Chen, Y., & Smith, T. J. (2015). The effect of a graph-oriented computer-assisted project-based learning environment on argumentation skills. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31(1), 32-58.
Hyun, J., Ediger, R., & Lee, D. (2017). Students’ satisfaction on their learning process in active learning and traditional classrooms. International journal of teaching and learning in higher education, 29(1), 108-118.
Johnson, D. W., Johnson, R. T., & Smith, K. A. (1991). Active learning: Cooperation in the College Classroom. Edina, MN: Interaction.
Johnson, D., Johnson, R., & Smith, K. (1998). Cooperative Learning Returning to College, What evidence is there that it works? Change, 30(4), 26-35.
Ketpichainarong, W., & Sriwattanarothai, N. (2014). Kān rīan chœ̄ng ruk læ theknik withīkān čhatkān rīan kānsǭn thī nēn kān rīan chœ̄ng ruk [Active learning and technique for teaching and learning with focus on active learning]. Retrieved January 21, 2020 from https://il.mahidol.ac.th/upload/mupd/Day3_Session5_Active%20Learning%20Techniques.pdf
Krippendorff, K. (2013). Content analysis. An introduction to its methodology (3rd ed). California, CA: Sage Publications.
Laws, P., Rosborough, P., & Poodry, F. (1999). Women’s responses to an activity-based introductory physics program. American Journal of Physics, 67(s1), S32–S37.
doi:10.1119/1.19077
Leat, D., Lofthouse, R., & Towler, C. (2012). Improving coaching by and for school teachers. In Fletcher, S. J. & Mullen, C. (Eds) (pp.43-58). Mentoring and coaching in education. London: The sage publication.
Leelajaraskul, C. (2000). Laksūt læ kānrīan kānsō̜n khanittasāt nai rōngrīan matthayommasưksā [School mathematics curriculum and instruction] (Master’s thesis). Graduate School, Srinakharinwirot University, Bangkok.
Makmee, P. (2011). Kānrīanrū dōi chai panhā pen thān [Problem-based learning]. EAU Heritage Journal, 5(1), 6-14.
Maneechote, B. (1997). The relationships between participative instruction and inquiry behavior of nursing students (Master’s thesis). Nursing Science (Community Health Nursing), Graduate School, Mahidol University, Bangkok.
Ministry of Education. (2008). Towards a learning and sharing society in Thailand. Bangkok: Information center at office of the permanent secretary ministry of education. Retrieved from https://www.bic.moe.go.th/index.php/component/k2/item/4163-towards-a-learning-and-sharing-society-in-thailand?fbclid=IwAR04_tKqZVEne
NZMwxXztaanvnp-IqaUOJHbrVsgWBTl5lm2dvlPsy8P5X0
Mohammad, H. B. (2017). The impact of Problem-Based Learning on students’ competencies in technical vocational education and training. Retrieved from http://vbn.aau.dk/files/267747935/PHD_Hashim_Bin_Mohammad_E_pdf.pdf
Moore, E. B., Herzog, T. A., & Perkins, K. K. (2013). Interactive simulations as implicit support for guided inquiry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(3), 257–268. doi:10.1039/C3RP20157K
Niemi, H., & Nevgi, A. (2014). Research studies and active learning promoting professional competences in Finnish teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 43, 131-142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2014.07.006
Norman, G., & Schmidt, H. (2000). Effectiveness of problem based curricula: Theory, practice and paper darts. Medical Education, 34(9), 721-728.
Office of the Educational Council. (2015). Khrōngkān patirūp kān rīanrū sū phū rīan [The education reform lab and coaching lab (2014-2017): Problems reflection and solutions]. Bangkok: 21 Century.
O'Connor, E., McDonald, F., & Ruggiero, M. (2014). Scaffolding complex learning: Integrating 21st century thinking, emerging technologies, and dynamic design and assessment to expand learning and communication opportunities. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 43(2), 199-226. doi: 10.2190/ET.43.2.g
O’Donoghue, G., McMahon, S., Doody, C., Smith, K., & Cusack, T. (2011). Problem-based learning in professional entry-level therapy education: A review of controlled evaluation studies. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 5(1), 54-73. doi:10.7771/1541-5015.1218
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2016). Reviews of
national policies for education: Education in Thailand. Paris: OECD Publishing.
Prince, (2004). Does Active Learning Work? A review of the research. Journal of
Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.
Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Rosenshine, B., & Guenther, J. (1992). Using scaffolds for teaching higher level. New York: Free Press.
Simone, C. D. (2014). Problem-Based Learning in teacher education: Trajectories of change. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4(12), 17-29.
Song, Y. (2016). We found the ‘black spots’ on campus on our own: Development of inquiry skills in primary science learning with BYOD (Bring Your Own Device). Interactive Learning Environments, 24(2), 291–305. doi:10.1080/10494820.2015.1113707
Samkoset, W. (2010). Best edutainment essay. Bangkok: Open book.
Vernon, D., & Blake, R. (1993). Does problem-based learning work? A meta-analysis of
research. Academic Medicine, 68(7), 550-563.
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Business School Press.
Wansaman, W., & Laohawiriyanon, C. (2016). Kān sœ̄m sāng kān patisamphan rawāng phū rīan phāsā ʻAngkrit chapho̜ thāngnai hō̜ng rīanʻō̜nlaidōi chai krabūan kānsœ̄m tō̜ sakkayaphāp kānrīanrū [Fostering student interaction in ESP online class through Scaffolding]. Journal of Liberal Arts, 8(1), 48-78.
Wood, D. J., Bruner, J. S., & Ross, G. (1976). The Role of Tutoring in Problem Solving. Journal of Child Psychiatry and Psychology, 17(2), 89-100.doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7610.1976.tb00381.x
Yoelao, D., Kasemnet, L., & Janesawang, T. (2014). Khrōng kān sāng chut khwām rū phư̄asāng sœ̄m thak sahǣng sata watthī yīsipʻetkhō̜ng dek læ yaowachon: čhāk prasopkān khwām samret khō̜ng rōngrīan Thai [Create a knowledgebase to enhance the 21st century skills of children and youth: Experience from the success of Thai schools] (Research report). Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University.