Family Strengths in Generation Alpha in the Thai Context

Main Article Content

Kanchana Pattrawiwat
Sudarat Tuntivivat


The relationships between people of different generations are a core component of family strength. This research aimed to investigate the scenario of family strengths among members of generation alpha in the Thai context. The six steps of Ethnographic Delphi Futures Research technique (EDFR) were applied to exploratory forecasting on future needs and followed by statistical analysis. There were 15 experts purposively selected from different institutions, including policy makers, academic experts, professional practitioners, and parents who received national awards for children and family. Both in-depth interviews and questionnaires were used to analyze the median and interquartile range. The findings consisted of different aspects, including family institutions, educational institutions, media institutions, government institutions, and the community. This research contributes to behavioral science by providing deeper knowledge and understanding of ways to strengthen family relationships among members of generation alpha.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pattrawiwat, K., & Tuntivivat, S. (2021). Family Strengths in Generation Alpha in the Thai Context. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 16(3), 16–26. Retrieved from
Research Articles


Areekul, C. (2019). Kānsưksā thāng lư̄ak : rūpbǣp kānrīanrū thī samkhan samrap čhēnœ̄rēchan ʻǣnfā [Alternative Education: The Important Learning Model for Generation Alpha]. Journal of MCU Social Science Review, 8(3), 270 – 283.

Axpe, I., Rodríguez-Fernández, A., Goñi, E., & Antonio-Agirre, I. (2019). Parental socialization styles: The contribution of paternal and maternal affect/communication and strictness to family socialization style. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(12), 2204.

Beaujouan, E., Solaz, A. (2019). Is the family size of parents and children still related? Revisiting the cross-generational relationship over the last century. Demography, 56, 595–619.

Bromwich, J. E., & Haag, M. (2018). Facebook is changing: What does that mean for your news feed? The New York Times.

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological Models of Human Development. In International Encyclopedia of Education (Vol. 3, 2nd ed., pp. 3-44). Elsevier.

Bryan, J. (2005). Fostering educational resilience and achievement in urban schools through school-family-community partnerships. Professional School Counseling, 8, 219-227.

Carré, A., Stefaniak, N., D’Ambrosio, F., Bensalah, L., & Besche-Richard, C. (2013). The Basic Empathy Scale in Adults (BES-A): Factor structure of a revised form. Psychological Assessment, 25(3), 679–691.

Carrier, L. M., Spradlin, A., Bunce, J. P., & Rosen, L. D. (2015). Virtual empathy: Positive and negative impacts of going online upon empathy in young adults. Computers in Human Behavior, 52, 39–48.

Ceja, M. (2004). Chicana college aspirations and the role of parents: Developing educational resiliency. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 3, 338-362.

Clausen, J. A. (Ed.) (1968) Socialization and Society. Little Brown and Company.

Coleman, M., & Lawrence, G. (2015). The Social History of the American Family: An Encyclopedia. Sage Publishing.

Dahlsgaard, K., Peterson, C., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Shared virtue: The convergence of valued human strengths across culture and history. Review of General Psychology, 9, 203–213.

DeFrain, J., & Asay, S. M. (2007). Strong families around the world: An introduction to the family strengths perspective. Marriage & Family Review, 41(1-2), 1–10.

Foot, J., & Hopkins, T. (2010). A glass half full: How an asset approach can improve community health and wellbeing. Liberata Design and Print Studio.

Green, B. L., McAllister, C. L., & Tarte, J. M. (2004). The strengths-based practices inventory: A tool for measuring strengths-based service delivery in early childhood and family support programs, Families in society. The Journal of Contemporary Social Services, 85(3), 326- 335.

Hammond, W. (2010). Principles of Strength-Based Practice. Resiliency Initiatives.

Ibáñez-Cubillas, P. I., Díaz-Martín, C., & Torregrosa, A. P. (2017). Social networks and childhood: New agents of socialization. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237(2017), 64-69.

Jin, B. K., & Ahn, H. Y. (2019). Factors influencing the happiness of late school-aged children: A focus on family strength and self-control. Child Health Nursing Research, 25(3), 245–254.

Jinnge, P., Chaijukul, Y., Srijindarat, U., Kramanont, S., Kasemnetr, L., Wongratana, C., Kaochim, P., Thongpakdee, T., & Kesonpat, P. (2021). Kānsāng ʻongprakō̜p khwāmkhēmkhæng khō̜ng khrō̜pkhrūa tām bō̜ribot sangkhom Thai [Construction of Family Strength Components in the Context of Thai Society]. Warasan Phuettikammasat, 27(1), 8-40.

Kramer, A. D. I., Guillory, J. E., & Hancock, J. T. (2014). Experimental evidence of massive- scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 111(29), 10779.

MacDonald, D. S. (2010). Family Ties: Patterns of Connectedness in One American Family. Syracuse University.

McCashen, W. (2005). The Strengths Approach. St. Lukes Innovative Resources.

McCrindle, M. (2015). Generation alpha: Mark McCrindle Q & A with The New York Times. McCrindle.


Moore, Q., & Wood, R. G. (2014). Multiple Comparisons and Truncation Bias in Family Policy Research: Strategies from the Building Strong Families Evaluation. In: McHale, S., Amato, P., & Booth, A. (Eds.) Emerging Methods in Family Research. National Symposium on Family Issues (vol. 4). Springer.

Nagy, A., & Kölcsey, A. (2017). Generation alpha: Marketing or acience? Acta Technologica Dubnicae, 7(1), 107-115.

Office of the National Economic and Social Development Council. (2019). (Rāng) Yutthasāt chāt raya yīsip pī (Phō̜.Sō̜. sō̜ngphanhārō̜ihoksip - sō̜ngphanhārō̜ičhetsipkāo) [20-Year National Strategy Framework (2017 - 2036)].

Pasquarelli, A., & Schultz, E. J. (2019). New Kids on the Block; Move over Gen Z, Generation alpha is the one to watch. AdAge.

Poolpatarachewin, C. (1986). Ethnographic Delphi Futures Research. Journal of Social Research, 1(2), 16-23.

Prachuabmoh, V. (2019, February 25). Aging in Thailand (Expert Group Meeting Session 3), Measuring Population Ageing: Bridging Research and Policy. Mandarin Hotel, Bangkok, Thailand.

Seemiller, C., & Grace, M. (2016). Generation Z Goes to College. Jossey-Bass.

Soratana, N. (2019). Kānphatthanā krabūankān songsœ̄m kānrīanrū talō̜t chīwit phư̄a sœ̄msāng khwāmkhēmkhæng khō̜ng khrō̜pkhrūa nai bō̜ribot sangkhom Thai [Development of Lifelong Learning Process to Enhance Family Strengths in Thai Context] (Doctoral dissertation). Faculty of Education, Chulalongkorn University, Thailand.

Stinnett, A. A. (1996). Adjusting for bias in C/E ratio estimates. Health economics, 5(5), 470–472.<470::AID-HEC224>3.0.CO;2-5

Sveinbjarnardottir, E. K., & Svavarsdottir, E. K. (2019). Drawing forward family strengths in short therapeutic conversations from a psychiatric nursing perspective. Perspectives in Psychiatric Care, 55(1), 126–132.

Tripathi, S. (2019) Khunnalaksana læ čhitsamnưk khō̜ng dek yuk dičhithan kap kān prap krabūanthat mai [The Digital Youth’s Personality and Conscience Versul Their Vision Adjustment]. Journal of Early Childhood Education Management, 1(1), 90-100.

Turner, A. (2015). Generation Z: Technology and social interest. The Journal of Individual Psychology, 71(2).

Twenge, J. M. (2017). iGen: Why Today’s Super-Connected Kids are Growing Up Less Rebellious, More Tolerant, Less Happy and Completely Unprepared for Adulthood and What That Means for The Rest of Us. Atria Books.

Vincent, J. (2006). Emotional Attachment and Mobile Phones. Technology & Policy.

Walsh, F. (Ed.). (2012). Family resilience: Strengths forged through adversity, In Normal Family Processes (4th ed., pp. 399-427). Guilford Press.

Yang, C. C., Holden, S. M., & Carter, M. D. K. (2017). Social Media Social Comparison of Ability (but not Opinion) Predicts Lower Identity Clarity: Identity Processing Style as a Mediator. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 47, 2114–2128.