Fostering Creative Performance in Public Universities

Main Article Content

Praptini Yulianti
Rizki Sridadi
Yetty Dwi Lestari

Abstract


One of the important factors for higher education to achieve global university rankings is through the creative performance of the academic aspect in each faculty. Creative performance cannot arise spontaneously. It depends on individual and contextual factors.  This study examined how individual and contextual factors influence creative performance at public universities in Indonesia. The sample of the study was 200 lecturers recruited through simple random sampling.  The results indicated that perceived organizational support for creativity was positive and significant related to creative performance, creative role identity, and creative self-efficacy (β = .17, p = .01 β = .31, p = .00; β = .17, p = .00, respectively). Creative role identity was indicated positive and significant to creative self-efficacy (β = .49, p = .00). Creative role identity did not show any significancy to creative performance. However creative self-efficacy was significant to creative performance (β = .13, p = .05; β = .34, p = .00); whilst moderate result was shown in the creative organizational climate. The relationship between perceived organizational support for creativity and creative performance was (β = .09, p = .04). This research suggests that perceived organizational support for creativity, creative self-efficacy, and creative organizational climate are important factors to enhance lecturers' creative performance. The practical implication, especially in improving the lecture’s creative performance, is the need to develop perceived organizational support for creativity and create a creative organizational climate in higher education.



Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Yulianti, P., Sridadi, R., & Lestari, Y. D. . (2022). Fostering Creative Performance in Public Universities. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 17(1), 15–26. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/254130
Section
Research Articles

References

Amabile, T. M., Conti, R., Coon, H., Lazenby, J., & Herron, M. (1996). Assessing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39, 1154–1184. https://doi.org/10.5465/256995

Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior, 36, 157–183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2016.10.001

Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of Management Review, 14(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1989.4278999

Azim, M. T., Fan, L., Uddin, M. A., Abdul Kader Jilani, M. M., & Begum, S. (2019). Linking transformational leadership with employees’ engagement in the creative process. Management Research Review, 42(7), 837–858. https://doi.org/10.1108/MRR-08-2018-0286

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W.H. Freeman and Company. American Psychological Association, (pp. 36-78).

Barbot, B., & Heuser, B. (2017). Creativity and Identity Formation in Adolescence: A Developmental Perspective. In M. Karwowski & J. C. Kaufman (Eds.), The Creative Self: Effect of Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, Mindset, and Identity (pp. 87–98). Elsevier Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-809790-8.00005-4

Beghetto, R. A. (2014). Creative mortification: An initial exploration. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(3), 266-276. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036618

Brozovic, D. (2018). Strategic Flexibility: A Review of the Literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 20(1), 3–31. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijmr.12111

Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (1999). Trust and commitment through self-verification. Social Psychology Quarterly, 62, 347–366. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695833

Chan, X. W., Kalliath, T., Brough, P., O’Driscoll, M., Siu, O. L., & Timms, C. (2017). Self-efficacy and work engagement: test of a chain model. International Journal of Manpower, 38(6), 819–834. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJM-11-2015-0189

Cortina, J. M., Chen, G., & Dunlap, W. P. (2001). Testing interaction effects in LISREL: Examination and illustration of available procedures. Organizational Research Methods, 4(4), 324–360. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810144002

De Stobbeleir, K. E. M., Ashford, S. J., & Buyens, D. (2011). Self-regulation of creativity at work: The role of feedback-seeking behavior in creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 811–831. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2011.64870144

DiLiello, T. C., Houghton, J. D., & Dawley, D. (2011). Narrowing the creativity gap: The moderating effects of perceived support for creativity. Journal of Psychology: Interdisciplinary and Applied, 145(3), 151-172. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.2010.548412

Eisenberger, R., Stinglhamber, F., Vandenberghe, C., Sucharski, I. L., & Rhoades, L. (2002). Perceived supervisor support: Contributions to perceived organizational support and employee retention. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 565–573. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.3.565

Ekvall, G. (1996). Organizational climate for creativity and innovation. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 5(1), 105–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/13594329608414845

Gong, Y., Huang, J. C., & Farh, J. L. (2009). Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of Management Journal, 52(4), 765–778. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMJ.2009.43670890

Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis Seventh Edition. In Pearson New International. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-01517-0_3

Hamzah, H., Nordin, N. S., Dwiyanti, R., Na’imah, T., & Mawi, N. (2021). The Role of Well-Being, Supervisor Support and Positive Feedback on Lecturers’ Work Engagement. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 16(1), 73-84.

Ibrahim, H. I., Isa, A., & Shahbudin, A. S. Md. (2016). Organizational support and creativity: the role of developmental experiences as a moderator. Procedia Economics and Finance, 35. https://doi.org/10.1016/s2212-5671(16)00063-0

Isaksen, S. G., Lauer, K. J., Ekvall, G., & Britz, A. (2000). Perceptions of the best and worst climates for creativity: Preliminary validation evidence for the situational outlook questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 13(2), 171–184. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326934crj1302_5

Jaussi, K. S., & Randel, A. E. (2014). Where to Look? Creative self-efficacy, knowledge retrieval, and incremental and radical creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 26, 400–410. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2014.961772

Karwowski, M. (2012). Did curiosity kill the cat? Relationship between trait curiosity, creative self-efficacy, and creative personal identity. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 8, 547–558. https://doi.org/10.5964/ejop.v8i4.513

Kylén, S. F., & Shani, A. B. R. (2002). Triggering creativity in teams: An exploratory investigation. Creativity and Innovation Management, 11(1), 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8691.00233

Lemons, G. (2010). Bar drinks, rugas, and gay pride parades: Is creative behavior a function of creative self-efficacy? Creativity Research Journal, 22, 151–161. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.481502

Lyons, P., & Bandura, R. (2019). Self-efficacy: core of employee success. Development and Learning in Organizations, 33(3), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.1108/DLO-04-2018-0045

Madjar, N., Oldham, G. R., & Pratt, M. G. (2002). There’s no place like home? the contributions of work and nonwork creativity support to employees’ creative performance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(4), 757–767. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069309

Miao, Q., Newman, A., Schwarz, G., & Cooper, B. (2018). How leadership and public service motivation enhance innovative behavior. Public Administration Review, 78(1), 71–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12839

Oldham, G. R., & Cummings, A. (1996). Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of Management Journal, 39(3), 607–634. https://doi.org/10.2307/256657

Petkus, E. (1996). The creative identity: Creative behavior from the symbolic interactionist perspective. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 188–196. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.2162-6057.1996.tb00768.x

Ping, R. A., Jr. (1996). Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 166–175. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.166

Plucker, J. A., & Makel, M. C. (2012). Assessment of Creativity. In The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 44–68). https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511763205.005

Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J. Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. In Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

Pretz, J. E., & McCollum, V. A. (2014). Self-perceptions of creativity do not always reflect actual creative performance. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8, 227. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035597

Shalley, C., Hitt, M. A., Zhou, J., & Tierney, P. (2015). An identity perspective on creative action in organizations. The Oxford Handbook of Creativity, Innovation, and Entrepreneurship (pp. 79–92). https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199927678.013.0003

Shier, M. L., & Graham, J. R. (2011). Work-related factors that impact social work practitioners’ subjective well-being: Well-being in the workplace. Journal of Social Work, 11(4), 402–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468017310380486

Stryker, S., & Burke, P. J. (2000). The past, present, and future of an identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(4), 284-293. https://doi.org/10.2307/2695840

Tamannaeifar, M. R., & Motaghedifard, M. (2014). Subjective well-being and its sub-scales among students: The study of the role of creativity and self-efficacy. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 37–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tsc.2013.12.003

Tan, C. S., Lau, X. S., Kung, Y. T., & Kailsan, R. A. (2019). Openness to experience enhances creativity: the mediating role of intrinsic motivation and the creative process engagement. Journal of Creative Behavior, 53(1), 109–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/jocb.170

Thundiyil, T. G., Chiaburu, D. S., Li, N., & Wagner, D. T. (2016). Joint effects of creative self-efficacy, positive and negative affect on creative performance. Chinese Management Studies, 10(4), 726–745. https://doi.org/10.1108/CMS-06-2016-0126

Tierney, P., & Farmer, S. M. (2011). Creative self-efficacy development and creative performance over time. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020952

Wang, C. J., Tsai, H. T., & Tsai, M. T. (2014). Linking transformational leadership and employee creativity in the hospitality industry: The influences of creative role identity, creative self-efficacy, and job complexity. Tourism Management, 40, 79–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2013.05.008

Williams, R., Runco, M. A., & Berlow, E. (2016). Mapping the themes, impact, and cohesion of creativity research over the last 25 years. Creativity Research Journal, 28(4), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2016.1230358

Woodman, R. W., Sawyer, J. E., & Griffin, R. W. (1993). Toward a theory of organizational creativity. Academy of Management Review, 18, 293–321. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1993.3997517

Wu, C. H., Parker, S. K., & De Jong, J. P. (2014). Need for cognition as an antecedent of individual innovation behavior. Journal of Management, 40(6), 1511–1534. https://doi.org//10.1177/0149206311429862

Yulianti, P., & Usman, I. (2019). Building employee creative performance: Through person-job fit, empowering leadership, and creative self-efficacy. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity, and Change, 9(8), 167–180.

Zhou, J., Shin, S. J., & Cannella, A. A. (2008). Employee self-perceived creativity after mergers and acquisitions: Interactive effects of threat, opportunity perception, access to resources, and support for creativity. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 44(4), 397–421. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886308328010