Imagined Intergroup Contact Promotes Prosocial Behavioral Intentions through Intergroup Anxiety in the United Kingdom and Malaysia
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research study investigates the mediating influence of intergroup anxiety in the linkage between imagined contact and prosocial behavioral intentions. Authors extend the existing literature on imagined contact by incorporating behavioral scripts and a visual perspective as part of the intervention. To further enhance the generalizability of the findings, the study was conducted in two distinct phases, encompassing diverse target groups of 147 British and 251 Malay students enrolled in universities in the United Kingdom and Malaysia, respectively. In the first experiment, the results revealed a significant main effect of condition, indicating high levels of altruistic intention after participants imagined contact (M = 3.82, SD = 0.32), in contrast to the control condition (M = 3.00, SD = 0.32). Additionally, the analysis demonstrated significantly reduced levels of intergroup anxiety (M = 2.06, SD = 0.35) and egoistic intention (M = 1.97, SD = 0.31). The findings also highlighted the mediating role of intergroup anxiety in the relationship between imagining positive contact and all three prosocial behavioral intentions: altruistic intention (β = 0.04, p < .001), egoistic intention (β = -0.02, p < .001), and willingness to donate (β = 0.19, p < .001). In the second experiment, the results were consistent with those obtained in the first experiment. These findings suggest that techniques involving a third-person perspective and the integration of intended behavior in imagery tasks not only enhance positive behavioral outcomes but also mitigate prejudice effectively.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Allport, F. H. (1954). The structuring of events: Outline of a general theory with applications to psychology. Psychological Review, 61(5), 281–303. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062678
Appiah, O., Eveland Jr, W., Bullock, O., & Coduto, K. (2022). Why we can’t talk openly about race: The impact of race and partisanship on respondents’ perceptions of intergroup conversations. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 25(2), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220967978
Armstrong, M., Morris, C., Abraham, C., & Tarrant, M. (2017). Interventions utilising contact with people with disabilities to improve children’s attitudes towards disability: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Disability and Health Journal, 10(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dhjo.2016.10.003
Auger, B., & Amiot, C. E. (2019). The impact of imagined contact in the realm of human-animal relations: Investigating a superordinate generalization effect involving both valued and devalued animals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85, 103872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103872
Beelmann, A., & Lutterbach, S. (2020). Preventing prejudice and promoting intergroup relations. In L. Benuto, M. Duckworth, & A. Masuda (Eds.), Prejudice, stigma, privilege, and oppression: A behavioral health handbook (pp. 309–326). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35517-3_16
Borinca, I., Falomir-Pichastor, J. M., Andrighetto, L., & Durante, F. (2021). Outgroup prejudice and perceptions of prosocial intergroup behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 51(1), 40–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2712
Boxer, P., Tisak, M. S., & Goldstein, S. E. (2004). Is it bad to be good? An exploration of aggressive and prosocial behavior subtypes in adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 33, 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:JOYO.0000013421.02015.ef
Britt, T. W., Boniecki, K. A., Vescio, T. K., Biernat, M., & Brown, L. M. (1996). Intergroup anxiety: A person × situation approach. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(11), 1177–1188. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962211008
Brown, R., & Hewstone, M. (2005). An integrative theory of intergroup contact. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 255–343). Elsevier Academic Press. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/10.1016/S0065-2601(05)37005-5
Cakal, H., Halabi, S., Cazan, A.-M., & Eller, A. (2021). Intergroup contact and endorsement of social change motivations: The mediating role of intergroup trust, perspective-taking, and intergroup anxiety among three advantaged groups in Northern Cyprus, Romania, and Israel. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(1), 48–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219885163
Cerrato, S., & Forestell, C. A. (2022). Meet your meat: The effect of imagined intergroup contact on wanting and liking of meat. Appetite, 168, 105656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2021.105656
Chen, S., & Jordan, C. H. (2020). Incorporating ethics into brief mindfulness practice: Effects on well-being and prosocial behavior. Mindfulness, 11(1), 18–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12671-018-0915-2
Christ, O., & Kauff, M. (2019). Intergroup contact theory. In K. Sassenberg & M. L. W. vliek (Eds.), Social psychology in action: Evidence-based interventions from theory to practice (pp. 145–161). Springer. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-030-13788-5_10
Crisp, R. J., & Husnu, S. (2011). Attributional processes underlying imagined contact effects. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2), 275–287. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210390721
Crisp, R. J., Husnu, S., Meleady, R., Stathi, S., & Turner, R. N. (2010). From imagery to intention: A dual route model of imagined contact effects. European Review of Social Psychology, 21(1), 188–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/10463283.2010.543312
Crisp, R. J., & Turner, R. N. (2009). Can imagined interactions produce positive perceptions? Reducing prejudice through simulated social contact. American Psychologist, 64(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014718
Dovidio, J. F., Hebl, M., Richeson, J. A., & Shelton, J. N. (2006). Nonverbal communication, race, and intergroup interaction. In V. Manusov & M. L. Patterson (Eds.), The Sage handbook of nonverbal communication (pp. 481–500). Sage Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976152.n25
Eisenberg, N., VanSchyndel, S. K., & Spinrad, T. L. (2016). Prosocial motivation: Inferences from an opaque body of work. Child Development, 87(6), 1668–1678. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12638
Elder, R. S., & Krishna, A. (2022). A review of sensory imagery for consumer psychology. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(2), 293–315. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1242
Fowler, C., & Harwood, J. (2021). Does perceived normativity of intergenerational contact enhance the effects of imagined intergenerational contact? Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 24(7), 1151–1179. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430220934548
Fuochi, G., Voci, A., Boin, J., & Hewstone, M. (2020). Close to me: The importance of closeness versus superficiality in explaining the positive-negative contact asymmetry. European Journal of Social Psychology, 50(4), 766–782. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2667
Gaesser, B., Shimura, Y., & Cikara, M. (2020). Episodic simulation reduces intergroup bias in prosocial intentions and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 118(4), 683–705. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000194
Glen, C., Taylor, L. K., & Dautel, J. B. (2020). Promoting Prosocial behavior toward refugees: Exploring the empathy-attitude-action model in middle childhood. In N. Balvin & D. J. Christine (Eds.), Children and peace: From research to action (pp. 71–87). Springer.
Grant, A. D., Miller, M. M., Hollingshead, N. A., Anastas, T. M., & Hirsh, A. T. (2020). Intergroup anxiety in pain care: Impact on treatment recommendations made by white providers for black patients. Pain, 161(6), 1264–1269. https://doi.org/10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001806
Harrington, H. J., & Miller, N. (1992). Research and theory in intergroup relations: Issues of consensus and controversy. In J. Lynch, C. Modgil, & S. Modgil (Eds.), Cultural diversity and the schools: Prejudice, polemic or progress? (Vol.2, pp. 159–177). RoutledgeFalmer.
Hayes, A. F. (2013). Mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. In T. D. Little (Ed.), Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed., Vol. 1, p. 20). The Guilford Press.
Ioannou, M. (2019). The week after: Do the effects of imagined contact last over time? Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 49(7), 459–470. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12597
Jones, E. E., & Nisbett, R. E. (1971). The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior. General Learning Press.
Kauff, M., Beneda, M., Paolini, S., Bilewicz, M., Kotzur, P., O’Donnell, A. W., Stevenson, C., Wagner, U., & Christ, O. (2021). How do we get people into contact? Predictors of intergroup contact and drivers of contact seeking. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 38–63. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12398
Landmann, H., Rohmann, A., Gaschler, R., Weissinger, S., & Mazziotta, A. (2023). Context matters–social context moderates the association between indirect intergroup contact and attitudes toward refugees. Social Psychology, 53(6), 341–356. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000505
Liebkind, K., Mäkinen, V., Jasinskaja-Lahti, I., Renvik, T. A., & Solheim, E. F. (2019). Improving outgroup attitudes in schools: First steps toward a teacher-led vicarious contact intervention. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 60(1), 77–86.
Lytle, A., & Levy, S. R. (2019). Reducing ageism: Education about aging and extended contact with older adults. The Gerontologist, 59(3), 580–588. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnx177
Malott, K. M., Wahesh, E., Moreton, A., & Crawford, E. (2023). Reducing intergroup anxiety: Applying an imagined contact intervention with counselors-in-training. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 51(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmcd.12258
Meleady, R., & Crisp, R. J. (2016). A future focus for imagined contact: Advances in and beyond intergroup relations. In L. Vezzali & S. Stathi (Eds.), Intergroup Contact Theory: Recent developments and future directions (pp. 139–158). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315646510
Meleady, R., & Seger, C. R. (2017). Imagined contact encourages prosocial behavior towards outgroup members. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 20(4), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430215612225
M’manga, C. B., & Shuliang, M. (2019). Personality, career decision-making and career expectations: A primary report from Malawi. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 14(3), 62–75. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/174855
Niese, Z. A., Eibach, R. P., & Libby, L. K. (2022). Picturing yourself: A social-cognitive process model to integrate third-person imagery effects. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 34(1), 24–44. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2021.1912051
Pagotto, L., Visintin, E. P., De Iorio, G., & Voci, A. (2013). Imagined intergroup contact promotes cooperation through outgroup trust. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 16(2), 209–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430212450057
Pak, T.-Y., & Babiarz, P. (2023). Relative deprivation and prosocial behavior: Evidence from South Korea. The Social Science Journal, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/03623319.2022.2151794
Pearson, D. G., Deeprose, C., Wallace-Hadrill, S. M., Heyes, S. B., & Holmes, E. A. (2013). Assessing mental imagery in clinical psychology: A review of imagery measures and a guiding framework. Clinical Psychology Review, 33(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2012.09.001
Pettigrew, T. F. (1998). Intergroup contact theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49(1), 65–85. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.65
Pettigrew, T. F. (2021). Advancing intergroup contact theory: Comments on the issue’s articles. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12423
Plant, E. A., & Devine, P. G. (2003). The antecedents and implications of interracial anxiety. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(6), 790–801. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029006011
Promchart, K., & Potipiroon, W. (2020). Transformational leadership and turnover intentions among school teachers in the deep south of Thailand. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 15(2), 16–37. https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/238796
Renner, F., Murphy, F. C., Ji, J. L., Manly, T., & Holmes, E. A. (2019). Mental imagery as a motivational amplifier to promote activities. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 114, 51–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brat.2019.02.002
Schmid, K., Hewstone, M., Küpper, B., Zick, A., & Tausch, N. (2014). Reducing aggressive intergroup action tendencies: Effects of intergroup contact via perceived intergroup threat. Aggressive Behavior, 40(3), 250–262. https://doi.org/10.1002/ab.21516
Schuchart, C., Glock, S., & Dunkake, I. (2021). The influence of in-group and out-group favouritism on the disciplinary practice of ethnic majority and minority preservice teachers. Social Psychology of Education, 24, 691–715. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11218-021-09627-w
Stark, T. H. (2020). Indirect contact in social networks: Challenging common interpretations of the extended contact hypothesis. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 23(3), 441–461. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430219846337
Strack, F., & Schwarz, N. (2021). What’s on Your Mind? Psychological Inquiry, 32(1), 35–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047840X.2021.1889328
Turner, R. N., Crisp, R. J., & Lambert, E. (2007). Imagining intergroup contact can improve intergroup attitudes. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 10(4), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430207081533
Turner, R. N., West, K., & Christie, Z. (2013). Out-group trust, intergroup anxiety, and out-group attitude as mediators of the effect of imagined intergroup contact on intergroup behavioral tendencies. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, E196–E205. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12019
Vezzali, L., Crisp, R. J., Stathi, S., & Giovannini, D. (2013). The affective consequences of imagined contact: A review and some suggestions for future research. TPM: Testing, Psychometrics, Methodology in Applied Psychology, 20(4), 343–363. https://www.tpmap.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/11/20.4.4.pdf
Vezzali, L., & Stathi, S. (2020). Using intergroup contact to fight prejudice and negative attitudes: Psychological perspectives. Routledge.
Vezzali, L., Stathi, S., Crisp, R. J., Giovannini, D., Capozza, D., & Gaertner, S. L. (2015). Imagined intergroup contact and common ingroup identity. Social Psychology, 46(5), 314–389. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000242
Wang, Y., Chen, C., Nelson, M. R., & Sar, S. (2022). Walk in my shoes: How perspective-taking and VR enhance telepresence and empathy in a public service announcement for people experiencing homelessness. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221108108
West, K., & Greenland, K. (2016). Beware of “reducing prejudice”: Imagined contact may backfire if applied with a prevention focus. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 46(10), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12387
West, K., Holmes, E., & Hewstone, M. (2011). Enhancing imagined contact to reduce prejudice against people with schizophrenia. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(3), 407–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430210387805
White, F. A., Borinca, I., Vezzali, L., Reynolds, K. J., Blomster Lyshol, J. K., Verrelli, S., & Falomir-Pichastor, J. M. (2021). Beyond direct contact: The theoretical and societal relevance of indirect contact for improving intergroup relations. Journal of Social Issues, 77(1), 132–153. https://doi.org/10.1111/josi.12400
Whitt, S., Wilson, R. K., & Mironova, V. (2021). Inter-group contact and out-group altruism after violence. Journal of Economic Psychology, 86, 102420. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2021.102420
Wu, J., Luan, S., & Raihani, N. (2022). Reward, punishment, and prosocial behavior: Recent developments and implications. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 117–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2021.09.003