A Causal Model of the Factors Affecting E-participatory Decision-Making among Thai Youth in the Public Policy Process

Main Article Content

Sujin Poonboon
Gamolporn Sonsri

Abstract

E-participatory decision-making among youths in the public policy process still lacks understanding, especially in relation to government agencies. As a result, young people are not able to make informed decisions, potentially leading to conflict and mistrust in the government sector. Therefore, this study aims to test a causal relationship model of the factors affecting the e-participation decisions of youths in the public policy process. Data were obtained through a survey of 846 youths aged 18–25 years in Bangkok, Thailand, analyzed using structural equation modeling. The Cronbach’s alpha coefficient showed an overall scale reliability of .97. The results of SEM analysis confirmed that the model was consistent with the empirical data (χ2 = 2.59, df = 23, p-value = .05, RMSEA = .06, CFI = .98, SRMR = .02), and has the capacity to explain the level of e-participatory decision-making in youths (  = .69). The perceived usefulness factor was found to be the strongest predictor (β = .32, p < .001), while belief orientation and the value of standard factors had no direct influence on decision-making. Furthermore, the perceived benefits of e-participation by youths were not affected by the expectation factor. These findings may contribute to a better understanding of the behavior of young people. The results can be applied as a guideline for government agencies to develop public policies that enhance the intention to improve and promote electronic channels for effective youth participation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Poonboon, S., & Sonsri, G. (2023). A Causal Model of the Factors Affecting E-participatory Decision-Making among Thai Youth in the Public Policy Process. The Journal of Behavioral Science, 18(3), 33–51. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/IJBS/article/view/265729
Section
Research Articles

References

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall.

Chainan, P. (2012). S̄ụ̄̀x xxnlịn̒ kạb kār s̄ụ̄̀xs̄ār thāngkār meụ̄xng k̄hxng yeāwchn thịy [Online media and political communication of Thai youth] [Doctoral dissertation]. Chulalongkorn University. http://cuir.car.chula.ac.th/handle/123456789/63783 [in Thai]

Ciranka, S., & van den Bos, W. (2020). Social influence in adolescent decision-making: A formal framework. Frontiers Psychology, 11, 598347. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.598347

Committee on Political Development, Mass Communication, and Public Participation (2020). Kār phạtʹhnā ch̀xng thāngkār rạb fạng khwām h̄ĕn læa pheìm kār mī s̄̀wn r̀wm k̄hxng prachāchn nı rūp bæb xxnlịn̒ [Developing channels for listening to opinions and increasing citizen participation in

an online format]. The Secretariat of The House of Representatives. https://bangkruaicity.go.th/content/file/blog/0916201600224387.pdf [in Thai]

Common, T. B. (2013). Bthbāth k̄hxng s̄ụ̄̀x h̄ım̀ nı kār s̄r̂āng kh̀ā niym thāng s̄ạngkhm læa xạt lạks̄ʹṇ̒ k̄hxng yeāwchn thịy nı k̄het krungthephmh̄ānkhr [The role of new digital media (NDM) in the construction of social values and identity of youth in Bangkok] (Research report). Dhurakij Pundit University. https://libdoc.dpu.ac.th/research/149786.pdf [in Thai]

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B. (1992). A first course in factor analysis (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315827506

Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319–340. https://doi.org/10.2307/249008

Diamantopoulos, A., & Siguaw, A. D. (2000). Introducing LISREL: A guide for the uninitiated. Sage.

Diehl, T., Barnidge, M., & Gil de Zuniga, H. (2019). Multi-platform news use and political participation across age groups: Toward a valid metric of platform diversity and its effects. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(2), 428–451. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018783960

Digital Government Development Agency (2022). 7 Brikār p̣hākh rạṭ̄h p̄h̀ān rabb dicithạl doy s̄ảnạkngān phạtʹhnā rạṭ̄hbāl dicithạl (xngkh̒kār mh̄āchn) kạb phæltfxr̒m klāng t̀āng «pheụ̄̀x h̄ı̂ h̄ǹwy ngān dị̂ phạtʹhnā brikār prachāchn p̄h̀ān ch̀xng thāng dicithạl dị̂ xỳāng s̄adwk rwdrĕw yìng k̄hụ̂n [Seven government services through digital systems by the Digital Government Development Agency (Public Organization) with various central platforms to allow agencies to develop public services through digital channels more conveniently and quickly]. https://www.dga.or.th/document-sharing/dga-news/80190/ [in Thai]

Dunne, J. H., & Mahmood, Z. (2022). Young people’s participation in decision making: UK 2022 survey report. https://www.youthimpact.uk/sites/default/files/2022-11/youth%20power%20survey_FINAL%20PUBLISHED_24.11.22.pdf

Hood, C. (1995). The new public management in the 1980s: Variations on a theme. Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 20(2/3), 93–109.

Htet, A. T. (2022). Factors influencing community participation of youth affairs committee members in Mon State Myanmar. Southeast Asia: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 22(1), 49–60. https://fass.ubd.edu.bn/SEA/vol22-1/ath-factors-influencing%20community.pdf

International Association for Public Participation (IAP2) (2018). IAP2’s public participation spectrum. https://iap2.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2020/01/2018_IAP2_Spectrum.pdf

Juma, N. A., Haroonah, N., Hamad, A. U., & Muhammed, R. W. (2020). Factors constraining youth participation in economic development in Zanzibar. Journal of Economics and Sustainable Development, 11(24), 75–80. http://doi.org/10.7176/JEP/11-24-06

Kaseya, C. N., & Kihonge, E. (2016). Factors affecting the effectiveness of public participation in county governance in Kenya: A case of Nairobi County. International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, 6(10), 476–487. https://www.ijsrp.org/research-paper-1016/ijsrp-p5871.pdf

Kanchanachitra, J. (2016). Thai health 2016: A good death: Alternative option. Institute for Population and Social Research, Mahidol University. https://ipsr.mahidol.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/454-ThaiHealth2016-EN.pdf

Kaewmorakot, P. (2017). Wạtʹhnṭhrrm kār mī s̄̀wn r̀wm thāngkār meụ̄xng k̄hxng wạyrùn nı s̄ạngkhm phh̄u wạtʹhnṭhrrm: Krṇī ṣ̄ụks̄ʹā xảp̣hex thephā cạngh̄wạd s̄ngk̄hlā [Political participation culture of youths in multicultural society: A case study of Thepha District Songkhla Province] [Master’s thesis]. National Institute of Development Administration. https://repository.nida.ac.th/handle/662723737/5895 [in Thai]

Khamis, R. (2023). Measuring citizens’ acceptance and usage of e-government services: Applying the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) in Egypt [Master's Thesis]. The American University in Cairo. https://fount.aucegypt.edu/etds/1969

Khantikul, P. (2010). Rūp bæb kār mī s̄̀wn r̀wm thāngkār meụ̄xng k̄hxng prachāchn k̄het dus̄it krungthephmh̄ānkhr [A political participation model of the people in Dusit District, Bangkok]

(Research report). Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University. http://ssruir.ssru.ac.th/handle/ssruir/963 [in Thai]

Khongthong, K., & Potongsangarun, R. (2020). Khwām tậngcı cheing phvtikrrm nı kār chı̂ thekhnoloyī k̄hxng klùm ce nex rechạ̀n bebī̂ būm me xr̒ læa ce nex rechạ̀n xĕks̒ [Behavioral intentions using technology of B Generation and X Generation]. Journal of Suvarnabhumi Institute of Technology (Humanities and Social Sciences), 6(2), 43-57. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/svittj/article/view/243607 [in Thai]

Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

Knoll, J., Matthes, J., & Heiss, R. (2020). The social media political participation model: A goal systems theory perspective. The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 26(1), 135–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354856517750366

Mathayyanan, P. (2018). Kār ṣ̄ụks̄ʹā pạccạy thī̀ s̄̀ng p̄hl t̀x phvtikrrm kār mī s̄̀wn r̀wm thāngkār meụ̄xng kār pkkhrxng thịy k̄hxng nạkreīyn radạb chận mạṭhymṣ̄ụks̄ʹā txn plāy: Krṇī ṣ̄ụks̄ʹā nạkreīyn rongreīyn s̄āms̄en withyālạy [The factor of participatory behaviors in Thai politics of students in an upper secondary school: A case study at the Samsenwittayalai School] [Independent Study]. Thammasat University. https://doi.org/10.14457/TU.the.2018.1137 [in Thai]

Mohamud, A. J., Muturi, W., & Samantar, M. S. (2018). Factors influencing youth participation in community development initiatives of Garowe District Molys: Ministry of Labour Youth and Sports UNDP: United Nations Development Program. International Journal of Social Science and Economic Research, 3(3), 1107–1145. https://doi.org/10.46609/ijsser

National Statistical Office (2021). S̄ảrwc kār mī kār chı̂ thekhnoloyī s̄ārs̄ntheṣ̄ læa kār s̄ụ̄̀xs̄ār nı khrạwreụ̄xn ph.Ṣ̄. 2564 Tịrmās̄ thī̀ 2 [The 2021 household survey on the use of information and communication technology (quarter 2)]. http://www.nso.go.th/sites/2014en/Survey/ICT [in Thai]

Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill.

OECD. (2020). Innovative citizen participation and new democratic institutions. https://doi.org/10.1787/339306da-en

Office of the Constitutional Court. (2017). Constitution of the Kingdom of Thailand B.E. 2560 (2017). P. Press. https://www.constitutionalcourt.or.th/occ_en/download/article_20170410173022.pdf

Omotayo, F., & Folorunso, M. B. (2020). Use of social media for political participation by youths in

Oyo State, Nigeria. JeDEM - EJournal of EDemocracy and Open Government, 12(1), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.29379/jedem.v12i1.585

Oumnoi, H., Tantasawat, V., Chuangcham, M., Kamphaengphan, S., Pramepluem, M., & Kraesang, T. (2016). Pạccạy d̂ān cit lạks̄ʹṇa læa d̂ān s̄p̣hāph wædl̂xm thī̀ keī̀ywk̄ĥxng kạb phvtikrrm kār mī cit xās̄ā k̄hxng nạkreīyn radạb mạṭhymṣ̄ụks̄ʹā txn plāy nı k̄het cạngh̄wạd pthumṭhānī [Psychological and environmental factors related to volunteer mind behavior of students in secondary school in Pathum Thani Province]. Valaya Alongkorn Review (Humanities and Social Science), 6(3), 1–14. http://acad.vru.ac.th/Journal/journal%206_3/6_3_01.pdf [in Thai]

Parsons, T. (1961). An outline of the social system. http://www.csun.edu/~snk1966/Talcott%20Parsons%20-%20An%20Outline%20of%20the%20Social%20System.pdf

Payakpong, A. (2017). Bæb cảlxng kār yxmrạb thekhnoloyī nı kār k̄hæ̀ngk̄hạn thāngkār tlād [Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) for marketing competitive]. Journal of Thonburi University, 11(25), 128–136. https://so03.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/trujournal/article/view/85642/68116 [in Thai]

Peng, M. Y. P., & Yan, X. (2022). Exploring the influence of determinants on behavior intention to use of multiple media kiosks through technology readiness and acceptance model. Frontiers Psychology, 13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.852394

Puttasri, S. (2020). Youth Manifesto: Nyobāy yeāwchn h̄ım̀ pheụ̄̀x kārmeụ̄xng k̄hxng khn h̄nùm s̄āw [Youth manifesto: New youth policy for young people’s politics]. https://www.the101.world/youth-manifesto/ [in Thai]

Raeisi, S., & Lingjie, M. (2016). Factors influencing to M-commerce adoption in China. The International Journal of Business & Management, 4(3), 372–384. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/301559518_Factors_Influencing_to_M-Commerce_Adoption_in_China

Raksakaew, K., & Doungphummes, N. (2017). Xithṭhiphl k̄hxng rāykār nı s̄ụ̄̀x h̄ım̀ thī̀ mī t̀x mum mxng t̀x lok k̄hxng dĕk læa yeāwchn [The influence of new media program on children and youth’s worldview]. Veridian E-Journal, Silpakorn University, 10(3), 152–169. https://he02.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/Veridian-E-Journal/article/view/103822 [in Thai]

Rathachatranon, W., & Lampai, R. (2020). Kār mī s̄̀wn r̀wm thāngkār meụ̄xng k̄hxng yeāwchn thịy: Mūl h̄etu rūp bæb læa p̄hl thī̀ keid k̄hụ̂n tām mā [The political participation of the Thai youth: Impact model and results]. Kasetsart University Political Science Review Journal, 7(1), 1–18. https://so04.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/kupsrj/article/view/247346 [in Thai]

Rawat, P., & Morris, C. J. (2021). The effects of technology and institutions on E-participation:

A cross-national analysis. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003164326

Reeder, W. W. (1971). Partial theories from the 25 years research program on directive factors

in believer and social action. McGraw Hill.

Reeder, W. W. (1974). Some aspects of the information social participation of farm families in

New York State. Cornell University.

Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Tijdschrift voor Onderwijsresearch, 2(2), 49–60. https://objects.library.uu.nl/reader/index.php?obj=1874-208332&lan=en#page//14/68/46/146846130157399069153656302154156262025.jpg/mode/1up

Rush, M. (1992). An introduction to political sociology. Prentice Hall.

Sabu, G. M. (2020). Factors that affect youth political participation in Ethiopia: Its impacts on the democratization process. Journal of Political Science and International Relations, 3(3), 61–69. http://doi.org/10.11648/j.jpsir.20200303.13

Sangaram, W. (2009). Xintexr̒nĕt kạb kār mī s̄̀wn r̀wm thāngkār meụ̄xng k̄hxng nis̄it cuḷālngkrṇ̒ mh̄āwithyālạy [Internet and political participation of Chulalongkorn University student]

[Master’s thesis]. Chulalongkorn University. https://doi.nrct.go.th/ListDoi/listDetail?Resolve_DOI=10.14457/CU.the.2009.1500 [in Thai]

Sinpongsaporn, W. (2020). Wikherāah̄̒ s̄ìng thī̀ reā h̄ĕn 1 s̄ạpdāh̄̒ h̄æ̀ng kār chumnum [Analyzing what we saw 1 week of political rally]. https://workpointtoday.com/protest/ [in Thai]

The Secretariat of the Cabinet. (2017). Phrarātchabanyat songsœ̄m kānphatthanā dek læ yaowachon hǣng chāt (chabap thī sō̜ng) Phō̜.Sō̜. sō̜ngphanhārō̜ihoksip (lem nưngrō̜isāmsipsī tō̜n thī hoksipsām kō̜) [National Gazette (No.134, Section 63, pp. 1–12)]. https://ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/documents/2109072.pdf

United Nations. (2022). E-government survey 2022.

https://publicadministration.un.org/egovkb/en-us/Reports/UN-E-Government-Survey-2022

United Nations. (2023). Promoting youth participation in decision-making and public service delivery through harnessing digital technologies. https://www.un.org/development/desa/dpad/wp-content/uploads/sites/45/publication/PB149.pdf

United Nations Economic and Social Council (2016). Challenges in implementing the social dimension of the 2030 agenda for sustainable development and the sustainable development goals. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/d8files/event-documents/CSD4_1%20E.pdf

UNICEF. (2021). Engaging children and young people on UNICEF's strategic plan 2022-2025. https://www.unicef.org/media/107941/file/Engaging_children_and_young_people_on_UNICEF%27s_Strategic_Plan.pdf

Venkatesh, V., & Bala, H. (2008). Technology Acceptance Model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. A Journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, 39(2), 273–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00192.x

Watson, D., Mhlaba, M., Molelekeng, G., Chauke, T. A., Simao, S. C., Jenner, S., Ware, L. J., & Barker, M. (2023). How do we best engage young people in decision-making about their health? A scoping review of deliberative priority setting methods. International Journal for Equity in Health, 22(17), 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12939-022-01794-2

Weber, M. (1987). The theory of social and economic organization. The Free Press.

Zubir, M. H. H., & Abdul Latip, M. S. (2023). Factors affecting citizens’ intention to use e-government services: Assessing the mediating effect of perceived usefulness and ease of use. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-04-2023-0040