Adoption Behavior of Solar Technology among Young Smart Farmers in Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Background/Problem: The adoption of solar technology by young smart farmers (YSFs) in Thailand remains under-researched, despite its potential benefits for sustainable agriculture.
Objective/Purpose: This study aims to identify and analyze the factors influencing the adoption behavior of solar technology among YSFs in the upper northern region of Thailand.
Design and Methodology: Using a survey methodology, data were collected from 300 YSFs and analyzed using statistical tools and binary logistic regression to determine significant predictors of technology adoption.
Results: The findings reveal seven critical determinants of solar technology adoption: duration of YSF membership (β = .59, p = .01), agricultural experience (β = .47, p = .03), loan repayment frequency
(β = .71, p < .01), land ownership (β = 1.03, p < .001), perceived benefits of solar energy (β = 2.57, p < .001), awareness of solar energy limitations (β = 2.19, p < .001), and perceived risks associated with solar energy (β = -.81, p = .01).
Conclusion and Implications: The study concludes that targeted educational programs in agricultural practices and financial management, coupled with interventions to address perceived barriers and risks, are essential to enhance the adoption of solar technology among YSFs. These findings provide valuable insights for policymakers, educators, and industry stakeholders in developing strategies to promote sustainable energy practices in agriculture, thus contributing to environmental sustainability and technological progress within the sector.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Alam, S. S., Ahmad, M., Othman, A. S., Shaari, Z. B., & Masukujjaman, M. (2021). Factors affecting photovoltaic solar technology usage intention among households in Malaysia: Model Integration and Empirical Validation. Sustainability, 13(4), 1773. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041773
Aroonsrimorakot, S., Laiphrakpam, M., & Paisantanakij, W. (2020). Solar panel energy technology for sustainable agriculture farming- A review. International Journal of Agricultural Technology, 16(3), 553–562. https://www.thaiscience.info/Journals/Article/IJAT/10992842.pdf
Ayana, O. U., & Degaga, J. (2022). Effects of rural electrification on household welfare: A meta-regression analysis. International Review of Economics, 69(2), 209–261. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12232-022-00391-7
Bathaei, A., & Štreimikienė, D. (2023). Renewable energy and sustainable agriculture: Review of indicators. Sustainability, 15(19), 14307. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151914307
Chen, X., & Li, T. (2022). Diffusion of agricultural technology innovation: Research progress of innovation diffusion in Chinese agricultural science and technology parks. Sustainability, 14(22), 15008. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142215008
Chikouche, S., Bouziane, A., Bouhouita-Guermech, S. E., Mostefai, M., & Gouffi, M. (2018). Innovation diffusion in social networks: A survey. In A. Amine, M. Mouhoub, O. Ait Mohamed, & B. Djebbar (Eds.), Computational intelligence and its applications: Advances in Information and Communication Technology. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89743-1_16
Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203774441
Creswell, J. W. (2012). Educational research: Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (4th ed.). Pearson Education. http://repository.unmas.ac.id/medias/journal/EBK-00121.pdf
Cui, L., & Wang, W. (2023). Factors affecting the adoption of digital technology by farmers in China: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 15(20), 14824. https://doi.org/10.3390/su152014824
DEDE. (2020). Thailand's energy situation. Department of Alternative Energy Development and Efficiency (DEDE), Ministry of Energy. https://webkc.dede.go.th/testmax/sites/default/files/Thailand%20Alternative%20Energy%20Situation%202020.pdf
Dhonde, M., Sahu, K., & Murty, V. V. S. (2022). The application of solar-driven technologies for the sustainable development of agriculture farming: A comprehensive review. Reviews In Environmental Science And Bio/technology, 21(1), 139–167. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11157-022-09611-6
DrishtiIAS. (2022). Attitude: Content, structure and function. Drishti IAS. https://www.drishtiias.com/to-the-points/paper4/attitude-content-structure-and-function
Gorton, M., Douarin, E., Davidova, S., & Latruffe, L. (2008). Attitudes to agricultural policy and farming futures in the context of the 2003 CAP reform: A comparison of farmers in selected established and new Member States. Journal of Rural Studies, 24(3), 322–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2007.10.001
Gorjian, S., Ebadi, H., Jathar, L. D., & Savoldi, L. (2022). Chapter 1 - Solar energy for sustainable food and agriculture: Developments, barriers, and policies. In S. Gorjian & P. E. Campana (Eds.), Solar energy advancements in agriculture and food production systems (pp. 1–28). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-323-89866-9.00004-3
Granić, A. (2022). Educational technology adoption: A systematic review. Education and Information Technologies, 27(7), 9725–9744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-022-10951-7
Habib, S., & Hamadneh, N. N. (2021). Impact of perceived risk on consumers technology acceptance in online grocery adoption amid COVID-19 pandemic. Sustainability, 13(18), 10221. https://doi.org/10.3390/su131810221
Harvard, G. (2018). Large-scale wind power has its down side. Harvard Gazette. https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/story/2018/10/large-scale-wind-power-has-its-down-side/
Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression (2nd ed.). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471722146
Huijts, N. M. A., Molin, E. J. E., & Steg, L. (2012). Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16(1), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2011.08.018
Jansuwan, P., & Zander, K. K. (2021). Getting young people to farm: How effective is Thailand’s young smart farmer programme? Sustainability, 13(21), 11611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132111611
Abnousi, V. K., Karantemiris, K., & Doulis, A. G. (2020). Agricultural cooperatives and acceptance of technological innovation. In E. Krassadaki, G. Baourakis, C. Zopounidis, & N. Matsatsinis (Eds.), Operational Research in Agriculture and Tourism. Cooperative Management, Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-38766-2_1
Kiros, Y. (2023). Loan repayment performance and its determinants: Evidence from micro and small enterprises operating in Dire-Dawa, Ethiopia. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 12(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-023-00271-6
Lyster, R. (2014). Renewable energy in the context of climate change and global energy resources. In P. Babie & P. Leadbeter (Eds.), Law as change: Engaging with the life and scholarship of adrian bradbrook (pp. 83–110). University of Adelaide Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.20851/j.ctt1sq5xcn.9
Maqbool, R., Deng, X., & Rashid, Y. (2020). Stakeholders’ satisfaction as a key determinant of critical success factors in renewable energy projects. Energy, Sustainability and Society, 10(1), 28. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13705-020-00259-0
Massresha, S. E., Lema, T. Z., Neway, M. M., & Degu, W. A. (2021). Perception and determinants of agricultural technology adoption in North Shoa Zone, Amhara Regional State, Ethiopia. Cogent Economics & Finance, 9(1), 1956774. https://doi.org/10.1080/23322039.2021.1956774
Moerkerken, A., Duijndam, S., Blasch, J., van Beukering, P., & van Well, E. (2023). Which farmers adopt solar energy? A regression analysis to explain adoption decisions over time. Renewable Energy Focus, 45, 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2023.04.001
Mohr, S., & Kühl, R. (2021). Acceptance of artificial intelligence in German agriculture: An application of the technology acceptance model and the theory of planned behavior. Precision Agriculture, 22(6), 1816–1844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-021-09814-x
Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691–692. https://doi.org/10.1093/biomet/78.3.691
NDOAE. (2019). Minutes of meetings seminars. Office of Agricultural Promotion and Development, Region 6, Chiang Mai. http://ndoae.doae.go.th/documents.php
Pathak, H. S., Brown, P., & Best, T. (2019). A systematic literature review of the factors affecting the precision agriculture adoption process. Precision Agriculture, 20(6), 1292–1316. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11119-019-09653-x
Qazi, A., Hussain, F., Rahim, N. A., Hardaker, G., Alghazzawi, D., Shaban, K., & Haruna, K. (2019). Towards sustainable energy: A systematic review of renewable energy sources, technologies, and public opinions. IEEE Access, 7, 63837–63851. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2019.2906402
Rasouli, M., Ayough, A., Khorshidvand, B., & Alemtabriz, A. (2023). Evaluating risk factors in solar energy investments: A strategic approach for Iran’s market. Solar Energy, 262, 111884. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2023.111884
Rumjaun, A., & Narod, F. (2020). Social learning theory-Albert Bandura. In B. Akpan, & T. J. Kennedy (Eds.), Science education in theory and practice. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-43620-9_7
Rusliyadi, M., Ardi, Y., & Winarno, K. (2021, November 18-20). Binary logistics regression model to analyze factors influencing technology adoption process vegetable farmers case in Central Java Indonesia. Proceedings of the international symposium Southeast Asia vegetable (pp. 460–470). Yogyakarta, Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.2991/978-94-6463-028-2_48
Spiegel, A., Britz, W., & Finger, R. (2021). Risk, risk aversion, and agricultural technology adoption-a novel valuation method based on real options and inverse stochastic dominance. Q Open, 1(2),
–26. https://doi.org/10.1093/qopen/qoab016
Sreejesh, S., Mohapatra, S., & Anusree, M. R. (2014). Binary logistic regression. In Business research methods (pp. 189-204). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-00539-3_11
Sukumaran, S., Sudhakar, K., Yusop, A. F., Kirpichnikova, I., & Cuce, E. (2022). Solar farm: Siting, design and land footprint analysis. International Journal of Low-Carbon Technologies, 17, 1478–1491. https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctac107
Tariq, G. H., Ashraf, M., & Hasnain, U. S. (2021). Solar technology in agriculture. In A. Fiaz & S. Muhammad (Eds.), Technology in agriculture (p. 20). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.98266
United Nations. (2022). The sustainable development goals report. United Nations. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2022/
Walesiak, M., & Dehnel, G. (2024). Progress on SDG 7 achieved by EU countries in relation to the target year 2030: A multidimensional indicator analysis using dynamic relative taxonomy. PLoS One, 19(2), e0297856. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0297856
Wang, J., Li, W., Haq, S. U., & Shahbaz, P. (2023). Adoption of renewable energy technology on farms for sustainable and efficient production: Exploring the role of entrepreneurial orientation, farmer perception and government policies. Sustainability, 15(7), 5611. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15075611
Wu, F. (2022). Adoption and income effects of new agricultural technology on family farms in China. PLoS One, 17(4), e0267101. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0267101
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics, an introductory analysis (2nd ed.). Harper & Row. https://www.sciepub.com/reference/180098