Training of Lead Guidance Teachers via Google Classroom in Schools under Ubon Ratchathani Primary Educational Service Area Office 1: A Mixed-Methods Research

Main Article Content

Noppawan Chumphol
Theerawut Akakul

Abstract

This research aimed to 1) compare satisfaction levels by gender and position of teachers toward the core guidance teacher training program through Google Classroom, and 2) examine the developmental needs of core guidance teachers. A mixed-methods research approach was employed. Quantitative data were collected from 121 participating teachers and analyzed using descriptive statistics including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation, as well as inferential statistics using t-tests to compare differences between genders and positions. Qualitative data were gathered through focus group discussions with six teachers who did not major in guidance and counseling, comprising three male and three female teachers. Content analysis was used for qualitative data analysis. The findings revealed that overall satisfaction with the training was at a high level (M = 4.43). Teachers expressed the highest satisfaction with content (M = 4.48), followed by instructors (M = 4.44), systems and technology (M = 4.43), and post-training application (M = 4.35). Gender comparison showed that female teachers had significantly higher satisfaction than male teachers in training content and instructors (p < 0.05). Position comparison revealed no significant differences. Focus group discussions indicated that teachers had developmental needs in both content and training format. They expressed interest in additional content on student mental health care, guidance for students with special needs, and guidance in the digital era, which would be beneficial for developing teachers appropriately and meeting the needs of guidance teachers in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Section
Research Articles

References

กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2555). คู่มือการจัดกิจกรรมแนะแนวตามหลักสูตรแกนกลางการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน พุทธศักราช 2551. โรงพิมพ์ชุมนุมสหกรณ์การเกษตรแห่งประเทศไทย จำกัด.

กระทรวงศึกษาธิการ. (2567). การมอบนโยบายการศึกษาและแนวทางการขับเคลื่อนนโยบาย "เรียนดี มีความสุข". https://moe360.blog/2023/09/14/minister-ed-statement-ed-policy/

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2561). ยุทธศาสตร์ชาติ พ.ศ. 2561–2580 (ฉบับประกาศราชกิจจานุเบกษา). สำนักงานคณะกรรมการพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ.

อภิชาต รอดนิยม. (2564). เทคโนโลยีการศึกษากับการจัดการเรียนการสอนออนไลน์ในยุคใหม่. มหาวิทยาลัย มหาจุฬาลงกรณราชวิทยาลัย.

Educational Excellence Foundation. (2565). 7 ความท้าทายที่ภาคการศึกษาต้องเผชิญในปี 2565. https://www.eef.or.th/news-7-challenges-education/

Korlat, S., Kollmayer, M., Holzer, J., Lüftenegger, M., Pelikan, E. R., Schober, B., and Spiel, C. (2021). Gender differences in digital learning during COVID-19: Competence beliefs, intrinsic value, learning engagement, and perceived teacher support. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, Article 637776. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.637776

Santos, J. M. (2021). Google Classroom: Beyond the traditional setting. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 79(4), 626. https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/21.79.626

Erawan, P.,and Erawan, W. (2024). Effective approaches to teacher professional development in Thailand: Case study. Journal of Education and Learning, 13(2), 64. https://doi.org/10.5539/jel.v13n2p64