A STUDY OF THE COMPONENTS OF INCLUSIVE LEADERSHIP OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATORS
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aims to study and define the comprehensive leadership components of school administrators using qualitative research methods. The research process is divided into three key steps. Step 1 is the synthesis of comprehensive leadership component from literature reviews, concepts, theories, and related research from a total of 8 sources. Then bring the synthesis results to select only the components that appear repeatedly and have a frequency of 50 percent or higher to define as basic components. Step 2: Collecting in-depth data from interviews with 5 selected experts using a semi-structured interview format, which is divided into two parts as follows: Part 1: Basic information of the interviewee, and Chapter 2 Comments on the Comprehensive Leadership Elements of School Executives. The information obtained was analyzed to improve and develop the elements to be more comprehensive and complete. And step 3 is the evaluation of the suitability of the comprehensive model elements of school administrators that have been synthesized and improved, based on evaluations from 5 experts and the tools used in the research. These include documentary synthesis models, semi-structured interview models, and a 5-point Likert scale questionnaire. The obtained data were analyzed using basic statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. The research results can be summarized as follows: The components of inclusive leadership consist of 4 elements: 1) relationships among colleagues 2) participation 3) decision-making, and 4) cultural intelligence. The four components reflect a leadership that can foster understanding, collaboration, and appropriate management of the diverse differences within the school, which will lead to the effective and sustainable development of educational management potential.
Article Details
References
นันทนา เจริญสุข. (2563). การพัฒนาตัวบ่งชี้ภาวะผู้นำแบบครอบคลุมของผู้บริหารโรงเรียนมัธยมศึกษาภาคตะวันออก สังกัดสำนักงานคณะกรรมการการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. ใน วิทยานิพนธ์การศึกษามหาบัณฑิตสาขาวิชาการบริหารการศึกษา. มหาวิทยาลัยบูรพา.
บุญชม ศรีสะอาด. (2553). การวิจัยเบื้องต้น. (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 8). กรุงเทพมหานคร: สุวีริยาสาส์น.
พระมหาสมบูรณ์ สุธมฺโม. (2557). บทบาทของผู้บริหารในการพัฒนาคุณภาพการศึกษา. วารสารครุศาสตร์ปริทรรศน์ฯ, 1(1), 89-102.
วนิดา แสนอินต๊ะ และเอกราช โฆษิตพิมานเวช. (2565). การพัฒนากลยุทธ์เพื่อการบริหารโรงเรียนเอกชนในสังคมไทยปัจจุบันโดยใช้ SOAR Analysis. วารสารบัณฑิตศึกษามหาจุฬาขอนแก่น, 9(2), 51-63.
สมภพ เพ็ญจันทร์. (15 มี.ค. 2562). แบบแผนในการเรียนการสอนนาฏศิลป์พื้นบ้าน. (เนตรนภิส พัฒนเจริญ, ผู้สัมภาษณ์)
สำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษาประถมศึกษาบึงกาฬ. (2566). แผนพัฒนาการศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน (พ.ศ. 2566 - 2567). บึงกาฬ: สำนักงานเขตพื้นที่การศึกษาประถมศึกษาบึงกาฬ.
Bush, T. (2020). Theories of Educational Leadership and Management. (5th ed.). London: Sage.
Carmeli, A. et al. (2010). Inclusive Leadership and Employee Involvement in Creative Tasks in the Workplace: The Mediating Role of Psychological Safety. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 250-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/10400419.2010.504654.
Deloitte, R. (2013). The six signature traits of inclusive leadership Thriving in a diverse new world. Retrieved April 14, 2016, from https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/topics/talent/six-signature-traits-of-inclusive-leadership.html
Dillon, B. & Bourke, J. (2016). The six signature trails of inclusive leadership: Thriving ina diverse new world. Westlake: Deloittle University Press.
Earley, P. C. & Ang, S. (2003). Cultural intelligence: Individual interactions across cultures. Stanford Business Books: Standford, CA.
EU Project. (2018). Inclusive leadership: Theoretical framework. EU project: The European Commission.
Evans, K. G. (2002). Leadership workshop. Education, 28(1), 123-137.
Ferdman, B. M. & Deane, B. R. (2014). Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Ferry, K. (2019). Building up organizational commitment of Generation Z. Journal of Social Innovation and Lifelong Learning, 13(3), 10-25.
Fullan, M. (2014). Leading in a culture of change. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Gallegos, P. V. (2014). The work of inclusive leadership: Fostering authentic relationships. In B. Ferdman & B. Deane (Eds.), Diversity at work: The practice of inclusion (pp. 177-202). Jossey-Bass: Wiley.
Hallinger, P. & Heck, R. H. (2010). Leadership for Learning: Does Collaborative Leadership Make a Difference in School Improvement? Educational Management Administration and Leadership, 38, 654-678. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143210379060.
Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership: Its effects onstudents, teachers and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness andSchool Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.
Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.
Smith, V. (1989). Host and Guests: The anthropology of Tourism. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
Wuffli, P. A. (2016). Inclusive leadership: A framework for the global Era. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
Zhang, X. & Zhao, Y. (2019). A discussion on Task-based Teaching of intermediate and advanced oral Chinese as a foreign language. Literature Education, 13(2), 92-93.