MANAGING THE INTERNATIONAL SUPPLY CHAIN OF THE BUSINESS SECTOR TO REDUCE RISKS UNDER THE SITUATION OF GLOBAL ECONOMIC VOLATILITY
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed 1) To study the international supply chain management of business sectors and 2) To examine the influence of key components on supply chain management among industrial enterprises engaged in import and export activities. This quantitative research employed a questionnaire to collect data from 500 industrial entrepreneurs involved in international trade. Statistical methods used for analysis included mean, standard deviation, t-test, and structural equation modeling (SEM). The results revealed that the overall level of importance of international supply chain management was high, with a mean score of 4.39. When considering each dimension, technology ( = 4.45) and communication integration (
= 4.44) had the highest mean scores. The t-test analysis indicated statistically significant differences in the overall importance level at the 0.05 level when classified by business size. The causal relationship analysis demonstrated that the modified structural model was consistent with the empirical data, with p-value = 0.171, CMIN/DF = 1.093, GFI = 0.962, and RMSEA = 0.014. The hypothesis testing showed that technology had a direct influence on communication integration, economic ecology, and operational competency, while economic ecology had a direct influence on communication integration and operational competency. The study concludes that technology serves as a critical mechanism driving international supply chain efficiency, enhancing communication integration and production management.
The findings align with the global trend in which digital technologies play a vital role in reducing transaction costs and strengthening competitiveness. Moreover, businesses of different sizes prioritize supply chain management components differently, depending on their capacity, resources, and adaptability to economic volatility.
Article Details
References
สำนักงานนโยบายและยุทธศาสตร์การค้า. (2568). สถานการณ์และแนวโน้มด้านโลจิสติกส์ไทย เดือนพฤษภาคม 2568. นนทบุรี: กระทรวงพาณิชย์.
Arbuckle, J. L. (2016). IBM SPSS Amos user’s guide. United States: Amos Development Corporation.
Attaran, M. (2020). Digital technology enablers and their implications for supply chain management. Supply Chain Forum: An International Journal, 21(3), 158-172.
Baldwin, R. & Freeman, R. (2022). Risks and global supply chains: what we know and what we need to know. Annual Review of Economics, 14(1), 153-180.
Department of Business Development. (2024). Monthly report of business registration statistic data 2566. Retrieved March 18, 2025, from https://www.dbd.go.th/common-article/category/44
Dwivedi, A. & Paul, S. K. (2022). A framework for digital supply chains in the era of circular economy: implications on environmental sustainability. Climate Change: Towards a Sustainable Future, 31(4), 1249-1274.
Fernando, Y. & Wulansari, P. (2020). Perceived understanding of supply chain integration, communication and teamwork competency in the global manufacturing companies. European Journal of Management and Business Economics, 30(2), 191-210.
George, D. & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference 11.0 update. (4th ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Hair, J. F. et al. (2010). Multivariate data analysis. (7th ed.). Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
Khan, S. A. et al. (2022). Digital transformation, smart technologies, and eco-innovation are paving the way toward sustainable supply chain performance. Science Progress, 105(4), 1-26.
Mamasoliev, S. (2024). Global supply chain resilience: implications for US trade policy and national security. American Journal of Education and Learning, 2(4), 525-535.
Matthew, D. & Carole, S. D. (2011). Social research: an introduction. (2nd ed.). London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
Mehmood, T. (2021). Does information technology competencies and fleet management practices lead to effective service delivery? empirical evidence from e-commerce industry. International Journal of Technology, 1(2), 14-41.
Park, A. & Li, H. (2021). The effect of blockchain technology on supply chain sustainability performance. Sustainability, 13(4), 1-18.
Roeck, D. et al. (2019). Distributed ledger technology in supply chains: a transaction cost perspective. International Journal of Production Research, 58(7), 2124-2141.
Roscoe, S. et al. (2022). Redesigning global supply chains during compounding geopolitical disruptions: the role of supply chain logics. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 42(9), 1407-1434.
SCB Economic Intelligence Center. (2566). แนวโน้มธุรกิจโลจิสติกส์ (ฉบับปรับปรุงเดือนสิงหาคม 2566). กรุงเทพมหานคร: ธนาคารไทยพาณิชย์.
Smorodinskaya, N. V. et al. (2021). Global value chains in the age of uncertainty: advantages, vulnerabilities, and ways for enhancing resilience. Baltic Region, 13(3), 78-107.
Sodhi, M. S. & Tang, C. S. (2021). Supply Chain Management for Extreme Conditions: Research Opportunities. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 57(1), 7-16.
Tiwari, S. (2021). Supply chain integration and industry 4.0: a systematic literature review. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 28(3), 990-1030.
Turner, R. C. & Carlson, L. (2003). Index of item-objective congruence for multiple objective measure. International Journal of Testing, 3(2), 163-171.