STRATEGIES FOR GOOD CORPORATE HEALTH MANAGEMENT UNIVERSITY IN GUANGXI PROVINCE, PEOPLE'S REPUBLIC OF CHINA
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purpose of this research were to 1) Study the good organizational health management practices of university administrators in Guangxi Province, People's Republic of China, and 2) Study the strategies for good organizational health management. The research population consisted of universities in Guangxi Province, People's Republic of China. This research employed a mixed-methods approach. The sample comprised 234 administrators and faculty members from universities in Guangxi Province, People's Republic of China, selected using purposive sampling. The research instrument was a 5-level Likert scale questionnaire with a content validity index of 1.00 and a reliability coefficient of .92. Statistical analysis included percentages, means, and standard deviations.
The results showed that, overall, the good organizational health management practices of universities in Guangxi Province, People's Republic of China, were at a high level. When considering individual aspects, organizational strength had the highest mean score, followed by morale.
The influence of administrators had the lowest mean score. Strategies for good organizational health management included visionary leadership, a positive work culture, transparent communication, promotion of participation, and staff skill development using integrated information technology systems. In the long term, university administrators in Guangxi Province encouraged personnel to employ diverse problem-solving methods and supported human resources based on competence. Each individual's aptitudes are considered, encouraging and developing personnel to produce academic work. Management possesses the right attitude, intention, and motivation to motivate personnel to perform assigned tasks in order to achieve organizational goals and lead to the sustainable improvement and development of management quality.
Article Details
References
Casio, W. F. (2015). Managing Human Resources: Productivity, Quality of work life, Profit. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Chad, H. et al. (2025). Do the People Make the Place? A 40-Year Review of Research on ASA Theory. Journal of Management, 52(1), 123-145.
Gulick, L. & Lindon, U. (2023). Paper on the Science of Administration. Clifton: Augustus M. Kelley.
Jean, S. B. et al. (2011). Modeling the Experience of Psychological Health at Work: The Role of Personal Resources, Social-Organizational Resources, and Job Demands. American Psychological Association International Journal of Stress Management, 18(4), 372-395.
Lovey, I. & Nadkarni, M. S. (2018). The Joyful Organization. India: Sage Publications.
Owens, R. (2011). Organizational Behavior in Education. New Jersey: Englewood Cliffs.
Paul, H. H. et al. (1988). Management of Organizational Behavior: Utihizing Human Resources. Boston: PWS-Kent.
Taylor, F. W. (1919). The Principles of Scientific Management. New York: Harper.
Wayne, K. et al. (1992). Open Schools/Healthy Schools: Measuring Organiza tional Climate. Newbury Park: Corwin Press.
Wiles, K. (1967). Supervision for better schools. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
Yannick, G. et al. (1997). Sustainable human resource management: The good, the bad, and making it work. Journal of Organizational Dynamics, 54(2), 11-17.
