DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM LISTED COMPANIES IN THAILAND

Main Article Content

Parisa Jindaluang

Abstract

The disclosure of sustainability information, or environmental, social, and governance (ESG) information, by listed companies is increasing due to pressure from investors, regulatory requirements, and stakeholder expectations. However, the level of disclosure varies between companies and industries. This paper aims to measure the level of sustainability disclosure of listed companies in Thailand, study the effect of financial factors on such disclosure, and compare the differences between industries. The research uses secondary data from 2024 from One Report annual disclosure statements and capital market databases. The sample size is 566 companies. The level of disclosure was measured using the Self-Disclosure Index (SDI) through content analysis, and hypothesis testing was performed using OLS multiple regression with robust standard errors. The results show that profitability and company size have a significant positive influence on the level of sustainability disclosure, while financial risk has a negative influence. Company age showed no significant relationship. In addition, industry type has a significant relationship with the level of disclosure. The research results support the framework of stakeholder theory, legitimacy theory, and representation theory in the dimensions of transparency and information asymmetry reduction, providing policy recommendations to support companies with resource constraints in improving their sustainability reporting. And it offers management approaches to integrate sustainability disclosure with organizational financial and risk management.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jindaluang, P. (2026). DETERMINANTS OF SUSTAINABILITY DISCLOSURE: EMPIRICAL EVIDENCE FROM LISTED COMPANIES IN THAILAND. Journal of Social Science and Cultural, 10(5), 67–75. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSC/article/view/293329
Section
Research Articles

References

Adams, C. A. (2017). Conceptualising the contemporary corporate value creation process. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 30(4), 906-931.

Cormier, D. et al. (2011). The informational contribution of social and environmental disclosures for investors. Management Decision, 49(8), 1276-1304.

Eccles, R. G. et al. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835-2857.

Flower, J. (2015). The international integrated reporting council: A story of failure. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 27, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2014.07.002.

Friede, G. et al. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210-233.

Hahn, R. & Kühnen, M. (2013). Determinants of sustainability reporting: A review of results, trends, theory, and opportunities in an expanding field of research. Journal of Cleaner Production, 59, 5-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.07.005.

Khan, M. et al. (2016). Corporate sustainability: First evidence on materiality. The Accounting Review, 91(6), 1697-1724.

OECD. (2019). OECD Corporate Governance Factbook 2019. Paris: OECD Publishing.

The Stock Exchange of Thailand. (2023). Sustainability reporting guidelines. Bangkok: The Stock Exchange of Thailand.

Villiers, C. et al. (2022). Developing a conceptual model of influences around integrated reporting, new insights, and directions for future research. Meditari Accountancy Research, 30(4), 933-957.