A NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR ENHANCING DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE AND SELF-REGULATION OF LOWER SECONDARY STUDENTS IN A DIGITAL SOCIETY CONTEXT

Main Article Content

Phatchana Intharatsami
Rathapol Pradubwate
Naruemon Sirawong

Abstract

This study aimed 1) To analyze the priority needs for enhancing digital intelligence and self-regulation among lower secondary students in a digital society context; and 2) To synthesize behavioral gaps and propose systemic approaches for fostering digital intelligence in a digital society context. The sample consisted of 401 students from demonstration schools under Srinakharinwirot University, determined using the Taro Yamane formula and selected through Multi-stage Sampling. The research instrument was a five-point Likert scale questionnaire utilizing a dual-response format. Data were analyzed using frequency, percentage, mean, standard deviation, the Modified Priority Needs Index (PNImodified), and content analysis. The findings revealed that the highest priority need was Digital Balance (PNImodified = 0.21), followed by Digital Literacy
(PNImodified = 0.08) and Digital Safety (PNImodified = 0.05). Notably, behaviors associated with self-regulation-particularly the ability to regulate screen time and adhere to planned usage-exhibited the most substantial gaps, indicating significant limitations in students’ behavioral control. In contrast, digital communication, etiquette, and rights demonstrated relatively low priority needs, suggesting that students possess a foundational level of competence in these areas. A key insight from this study is that students do not lack digital knowledge per se; rather, they experience difficulties in self-regulation and in applying critical judgment in real-world digital contexts. These findings carry important implications for curriculum design, highlighting the need to integrate behavioral self-regulation with critical thinking to effectively foster digital intelligence in contemporary learners.

Article Details

How to Cite
Intharatsami, P., Pradubwate, R., & Sirawong, N. (2026). A NEEDS ASSESSMENT FOR ENHANCING DIGITAL INTELLIGENCE AND SELF-REGULATION OF LOWER SECONDARY STUDENTS IN A DIGITAL SOCIETY CONTEXT. Journal of Social Science and Cultural, 10(6), 316–331. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/JSC/article/view/294521
Section
Research Articles

References

สำนักงานพัฒนาธุรกรรมทางอิเล็กทรอนิกส์. (2565). รายงานผลการสำรวจพฤติกรรมผู้ใช้อินเทอร์เน็ตในประเทศไทย ปี 2565. เรียกใช้เมื่อ 10 พฤศจิกายน 2568 จาก https://shorturl.asia/XHbJ9

สำนักงานสถิติแห่งชาติ. (2568). สำรวจการมีการใช้เทคโนโลยีสารสนเทศและการสื่อสารในครัวเรือน. เรียกใช้เมื่อ16 ธันวาคม 2568 จาก https://www.nso.go.th/nsoweb/nso/survey_detail/jJ?set_lang=th#gsc.tab=0

สุวิมล ว่องวาณิช. (2562). การวิจัยประเมินความต้องการจำเป็น (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 4). กรุงเทพมหานคร: สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.

Broadbent, J. & Poon, W. L. (2015). Self-regulated learning strategies & academic achievement in online higher education learning environments: A systematic review. The Internet and Higher Education, 27, 1-13 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iheduc.2015.04.007.

Guess, A. M. et al. (2019). Less than you think: Prevalence and predictors of fake news dissemination on Facebook. Science Advances, 5(1). https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/sciadv.aau4586.

OECD. (2021). 21st-Century Readers DEVELOPING LITERACY SKILLS IN A DIGITAL WORLD. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2023). OECD Digital Education Outlook 2023 Towards an Effective Digital Education Ecosystem. Paris: OECD Publishing.

Panadero, E. (2017). A Review of Self-regulated Learning: Six Models and Four Directions for Research. Frontiers in Psychology, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00422.

Pennycook, G. & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011.

Schunk, D. H. & Greene, J. A. (2018). Handbook of Self-Regulation of Learning and Performance. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.

Simon, K. (2025). DIGITAL 2026 GLOBAL OVERVIEW REPORT. Retrieved January 20, 2026, from https://datareportal.com/reports/digital-2026-global-overview-report

Turel, O. et al. (2018). Short abstinence from online social networking sites reduces perceived stress, especially in excessive users. Psychiatry Research, 270, 947-953. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychres.2018.11.017.

Twenge, J. M. (2020). iGen: why today’s superconnected kids are growing up less rebellious, more tolerant, less happy - and completely unprepared for adulthood. New York: Atria Books.

UNESCO. (2022). REIMAGINING OUR FUTURES TOGETHERA new social contract for education. Paris: UNESCO.

UNESCO. (2024). AI competency framework for students. Paris: UNESCO.

UNICEF. (2021). The State of the World’s Children 2021 On My Mind: Promoting, protecting and caring for children’s mental health. Retrieved November 21, 2025, from https://www.unicef.org/reports/state-worlds-children-2021

United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF). (2019). GLOBAL KIDS ONLINE: Comparative report. Retrieved January 20, 2026, from https://www.unicef.org/innocenti/media/7011/file/GKO-Comparative-Report-2019.pdf

Vuorikari, R. et al. (2022). DigComp 2.2: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens - With new examples of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.