THE MA-KE MODEL: A SOCIAL STUDIES MAKERSPACE INSTRUCTIONAL MODEL TO ENHANCE PRE-SERVICE SOCIAL STUDIES TEACHERS’ COMPETENCIES IN THE NEXT NORMAL CLASSROOM
Main Article Content
Abstract
The preparation of pre-service social studies teachers within next-normal classroom contexts lacks an operational framework that systematically integrates knowledge construction, critical thinking, socio-cultural participation, and teacher competency development, especially in the context of makerspaces, where most research is still limited to STEM fields.This study aimed to 1) Design the MA-KE Model as a Social Studies Makerspace instructional model for pre-service social studies teachers and 2) Examine the competencies developed through its implementation. A qualitative research and development design was employed within a participatory action research (PAR) framework, involving iterative cycles of planning, action, observation, and reflection. The model was developed by integrating educational theories with the socio-cultural context of Lanna communities in Northern Thailand. Participants comprised 64 pre-service social studies teachers from Chiang Mai University and 40 secondary school students from two schools, purposively selected to reflect the contextual differences between digital and cultural capital: a private school in an urban area and an ethnic minority boarding school. Data were collected using multiple methods (structured observation records; focus group discussions; open ended questionnaires; reflective journals; student produced artefacts) and data analysis was conducted via an iterative qualitative methodology. The results showed that the MA-KE Model consists of four consecutive phases: Mapping Learners, Architecting the Learning Journey, Kicking-off Creative Learning Practice, and Evaluating and Elevating Learners. In addition, the use of the model enabled the pre-service teachers to develop six competencies that functioned as an interconnected ecosystem, i.e., each of the competencies supported and complemented the other five. The study advances three theoretical contributions: A culturally grounded makerspace pedagogy framework, A reflective practice framework for transformative learning, The MA-KE Competency Ecosystem. These contributions support educational innovation aligned with Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) 4.7 and 10.
Article Details
References
กองทุนเพื่อความเสมอภาคทางการศึกษา (กสศ.). (2566). Internet Lost Education Error! เรียกใช้เมื่อ 21 กรกฎาคม 2569 จาก https://www.eef.or.th/article-190423/
ข้อบังคับคุรุสภาว่าด้วยมาตรฐานวิชาชีพ (ฉบับที่ 4) พ.ศ. 2562. (2563). ราชกิจจานุเบกษา เล่ม 136 ตอนพิเศษ 68 ง หน้า 18-20 (20 มีนาคม 2563).
สถาบันวิจัยเพื่อการพัฒนาประเทศไทย (TDRI). (2560). พัฒนาครูไทย เริ่มตั้งแต่ปรับหลักสูตรถึงกระบวนการพัฒนาต่อเนื่อง. เรียกใช้เมื่อ 21 กรกฎาคม 2569 จาก https://tdri.or.th/2017/06/education-teacher-reform/
อานุภาพ เลขะกุล. (2564). ความปกติถัดไปอุดมศึกษา: ความท้าทาย. วารสารการศึกษาและนวัตกรรมการเรียนรู้, 1(2), 111-125.
Andrews, M. E. et al. (2021). Self-efficacy and belonging: the impact of a university makerspace. International Journal of STEM Education, 8(1), 1-18.
Apple, M. W. (2013). Can Education Change Society? Abingdon: Routledge.
Arifin, Z. et al. (2025). The effect of inquiry-based learning on students’ critical thinking skills in science education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 21(3), 1-24.
Banks, J. A. & McGee, C. A. (1989). Multicultural Education. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
Beetham, H. & Sharpe, R. (2013). Rethinking Pedagogy for a Digital Age: designing for 21st century learning. New York: Routledge.
Braidotti, R. (2013). The Posthuman. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Culala, H. J. D. (2022). The “New Normal” in Education and the Future of Schooling. KnE Social Sciences, 1(2022), 40-47.
Darling-Hammond, L. et al. (2017). Effective Teacher Professional Development. Palo Alto: Learning Policy Institute.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York: Continuum Books.
Halverson, E. R. & Sheridan, K. M. (2014). The Maker Movement in Education. Harvard Educational Review, 84(4), 495-504.
Kemmis, S. & McTaggart, R. (2005). Participatory Action Research: Communicative Action and the Public Sphere. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd.
Khaewphuang, P. & Nuangchalerm, P. (2025). Components and Indicators of Instructional Design Competence for Thai Pre-Service Teachers. Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 6(2), 14-22.
Kyambade, M. et al. (2025). Exploring the evolution of artificial intelligence in education: from AI-guided learning to learner-personalized paradigms. Cogent Education, 12(1), https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2025.2505297.
Lave, J. & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lincoln, Y. S. & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
Mezirow, J. (1991). Transformative Dimensions of Adult Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Moll, L. et al. (1992). Funds of Knowledge for Teaching: Using a Qualitative Approach to Connect Home and Classrooms. Qualitative Issues in Educational Research, 31(2), 132-141.
National Council for the Social Studies. (2013). The College, Career, and Civic Life (C3) Framework for Social Studies State Standards: Guidance for Enhancing the Rigor of K-12 Civics, Economics, Geography, and History. Silver Spring: National Council for the Social Studies.
Papert, S. & Harel, I. (1990). Situating Constructionism. Cambridge: MIT Media Laboratory.
Pardede, P. (2024). The Strands and Findings of Recent Research on Technology-enhanced Collaborative Writing in EFL Settings: A Systematic Review. Journal of English Teaching, 10(2), 170-182.
Piaget, J. (1972). Intellectual evolution from adolescence to adulthood. Human Development, 15(1), 1-12.
Quintana-Ordorika, A. et al. (2024). The Impact of Using Collaborative Online International Learning during the Design of Maker Educational Practices by Pre-Service Teachers. Sustainability, 16(3), 1-13.
Schön, D. A. (1983). Educating the Reflective Practitioner. Towards a New Design for Teaching and Learning in the Professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the New Reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57(1), 1-23.
Tseng, H. & Inman, C. (2024). New Normal in higher education for the post-COVID-19 world: Reimagining and reexamining factors for student success in online learning. Online Learning, 29(2), 213-240.
Vongkulluksn, V. W. et al. (2018). The role of value on teachers’ internalization of external barriers and externalization of personal beliefs for classroom technology integration. Computers and Education, 118, 70-81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.11.009.
Vossoughi, S. et al. (2016). Making Through the Lens of Culture and Power: Toward Transformative Visions for Educational Equity. Harvard Educational Review, 86(2), 206-232.
Wineburg, S. (2001). Historical Thinking and Other Unnatural Acts: Charting the Future of Teaching the Past (Critical Perspectives on The Past). Philadelphia: Temple University Press.