DEVELOPMENT OF FOOTBALL GOALKEEPER SPECIFIC TEST WITH COMPUTER PROCESSING SYSTEM

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to 1) Study the special characteristics of the football goalkeeper position. 2) Develop a testing system and normal criteria for the special characteristics of the football goalkeeper position. and 3) Create and test a computer processing system.
This method was Research and Development (R & D) by selecting the target group by purposive selection, divided into 3 steps 1) The tool used was a semi-structured interview. Data analysis was conducted using inductive analysis based on interviews with 5 experts. 2) The tests and normal criteria were developed. The reliability and objectivity of the tests were determined from a sample of 30 Goalkeeper. Subsequently, normal criteria were created using 16 tests, with a sample of 100 Goalkeeper. and 3) Computer data processing system was developed. The system's effectiveness was evaluated by experts, and the satisfaction of coaches and athletes was assessed. A total of 5 experts, with 30 coaches and athletes, evaluated the system's suitability, usefulness, feasibility, accuracy, and user satisfaction. Data analysis was performed by calculating the mean and standard deviation. Results: 1) The synthesis of the test from the interviews provided the conceptual framework for test creation, the concept of being a football goalkeeper, and the concept of developing a computer processing system. 2) The tests and normal criteria developed can be used to establish criteria for all tests, divided into 5 levels: very good, good, average, low, and very low. and 3) The design and development of the test involves 7 usage steps: 1) Log in to the system by entering a phone number to receive an OTP code. 2) Filling out personal details. 3) Test results for the special characteristics of the goalkeeper. 4) Test results for physical fitness. 5) Test results for basic skills. 6) Test results for ability. and 7) Test report results. The evaluation results found that in terms of usefulness ( = 4.87, SD = 0.352), feasibility ( = 4.87, SD = 0.352), appropriateness ( = 4.60, SD = 0.503), accuracy ( = 4.60, SD = 0.507), the quality is at a very good level in all 4 parts and the user satisfaction is evaluated at the highest level ( = 4.65, SD = 0.573)