FACTORS INFLUENCING HOTEL BUSINESS PERFORMANCE IN THE GULF OF THAILAND
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aimed to examine the factors influencing the performance of hotel businesses in the Gulf of Thailand coastal area, covering Chumphon, Surat Thani, Nakhon Si Thammarat, Phatthalung, and Songkhla provinces. A quantitative research approach was employed using a survey research design. The sample consisted of 362 hotel owners and managers, determined using Yamane’s sample size formula and selected through convenience sampling. The research instrument was a questionnaire that was validated for content validity by experts and demonstrated high reliability, with Cronbach’s Alpha coefficients exceeding 0.70 Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. The results revealed that government support, innovation, and risk management had positive and statistically significant effects on hotel business performance. Government support exerted the strongest influence ( = 0.349, Sig. = 0.000), followed by innovation (
= 0.249, Sig. = 0.000) and risk management (
= 0.230, Sig. = 0.000). In contrast, digital marketing was found to have no statistically significant effect on hotel performance. The overall model fit showed a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.789 and a coefficient of determination (R²) of 0.623, indicating that the independent variables explained 62.3% of the variance in hotel business performance. The findings indicate that government support, innovation, and risk management are key factors in enhancing hotel performance and strengthening competitive advantage in the Gulf of Thailand coastal area. These results also provide important implications for policy direction, spatial development, and systematic long-term strategic decision-making, and can serve as strategic guidelines for hotel operators and relevant stakeholders to promote sustainable development in the hotel business sector.
Article Details
References
กรุงเทพธุรกิจ. (2567). เปิดสถิติปี 2567 ต่างชาติเที่ยวไทย 35.54 ล้านคน ส่อง 10 อันดับเดินทางสูงสุด. เรียกใช้เมื่อ 17 มกราคม 2569 จาก https://www.bangkokbiznews.com/business/business/1160350?utm_source=chatgpt.com
แผนพัฒนากลุ่มจังหวัดภาคใต้ฝั่งอ่าวไทย พ.ศ. 2566 - 2570. (2566). กลุ่มจังหวัดภาคใต้ฝั่งอ่าวไทย แผนพัฒนากลุ่มจังหวัดภาคใต้ฝั่งอ่าวไทย พ.ศ. 2566 - 2570. เรียกใช้เมื่อ 23 เมษายน 2566 จาก https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1V2EC8_hG0JpW8OjEu0vGiNYgKsOv7_PT
วรดิศ ธนภัทร. (2563). แบบจำลองความได้เปรียบทางการแข่งขันของโรงแรมขนาดเล็กในประเทศไทย. Journal of Modern Management Science, 13(1), 21-32.
สำนักงานส่งเสริมวิสาหกิจขนาดกลางและขนาดย่อม. (2566). จำนวนผู้ประกอบการจำแนกตามจังหวัด. เรียกใช้เมื่อ 23 เมษายน 2566 จาก https://shorturl.asia/lfIBb
Al-Nimer, M. et al. (2021). Risk management practices and firm performance with a mediating role of business model innovation. observations from Jordan. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(3), 1-20.
Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of management, 17(1), 99-120.
Chen, C. L. et al. (2021). Role Of Government to Enhance Digital Transformation in Small Service Business. Sustainability, 13(3), 1028. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13031028.
Falahat, M. et al. (2021). Entrepreneurial, market, learning and networking orientations as determinants of business capability and international performance: the contingent role of government support. International Entrepreneurship and
Management Journal, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-020-00738-y.
Goldman, S. P. et al. (2021). Strategic orientations and digital marketing tactics in cross-border e-commerce: Comparing developed and emerging markets. International small business journal, 39(4), 350-371.
Hanggraeni, D. et al. (2019). The impact of internal, external and enterprise risk management on the performance of micro, small and medium enterprises. Sustainability, 11(7), 1-17.
Hu, X. et al. (2020). Does Innovation Type Influence Firm Performance? A Dilemma of Star-Rated Hotels in Ghana. Sustainability, 12(23), 9912. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12239912.
Jardak, M. K. & Hamad, S. B. (2022). The effect of digital transformation on firm performance: evidence from Swedish listed companies. The Journal of Risk Finance, 23(4), 329-348.
Junusi, E. R. (2020). Digital marketing during the pandemic period; A study of islamic perspective. Journal of Digital Marketing and Halal Industry, 2(1), 15-28.
Kerdpitak, C. (2022). The effects of innovative management, digital marketing, service quality and supply chain management on performance in cultural tourism business. Uncertain Supply Chain Management, 10(3), 771-778.
Kijkasiwat, P. & Phuensane, P. (2020). Innovation And Firm Performance: The Moderating and Mediating Roles of Firm Size and Small and Medium Enterprise Finance. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13(5), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13050097.
Nakku, V. B. et al. (2020). The interrelationship between SME government support programs, entrepreneurial orientation, and performance: A developing economy perspective. Journal of Small Business Management, 58(1), 2-31.
Pu, G. et al. (2021). Innovative Finance, Technological Adaptation and Smes Sustainability: The Mediating Role of Government Support During Covid-19 Pandemic. Sustainability, 13(16), 9218. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13169218.
Savitri, E. et al. (2021). Can innovation mediate the effect of adaptability, entrepreneurial orientation on business performance? Management Science Letters, 11(8), 2301-2312.
Shad, M. K. & Lai, F. W. (2019). Enterprise Risk Management Implementation and Firm Performance: Evidence from the Malaysian Oil and Gas Industry. International Journal of Business and Management, 14(9), 47-53.
Turulja, L. & Bajgoric, N. (2019). Innovation, firms’ performance and environmental turbulence: is there a moderator or mediator? European Journal of Innovation Management, 22(1), 213-232.
Yamane, T. (1973). Statistics: An Introductory Analysis. (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.