Political Philosophy on Anarchism in Daoist Philosophy: A Scoping Review Study in the Past 40 Years
Keywords:
Daoist Philosophy, Anarchism, Political Philosophy, Chinese Philosophy, Scoping ReviewAbstract
The objective of this research is to focus on studying and reviewing the scope of research related to the political philosophy of Taoist philosophy concerning anarchism. We aim to identify gaps in the existing research, including research questions on the political philosophy of Daoist anarchism that should be pursued in the future. We utilize a research method known as a Scoping Review, following the framework developed by Hilary Arksey and Lisa O'Malley (2005). The five-step framework serves as a guide for conducting and analyzing data in this research. The review encompasses the period from 1983 to 2023. The research findings indicate that there have been 12 studies on the topic of anarchism and Taoist philosophy. The most extensively studied aspect is the use of Western philosophical principles in political philosophy to support the notion that Taoist philosophy is anarchistic. Furthermore, all of these studies employ an analytic philosophy approach. However, this research reveals that the understanding of anarchism in Taoist philosophy has not been conclusively established. Therefore, the researcher suggests conducting a phenomenological study of Taoist philosophy, followed by an analytic philosophical approach, to further advance philosophical research on Taoist anarchism in a more comprehensive manner.
References
เหลาจื่อ. (2562). วิถีแห่งเต๋า. (พจนา จันทรสันติ, ผู้แปล) กรุงเทพฯ: โอเพ่น โซไซตี้.
Agustoni, M. B. (2023). The Laozi and Anarchism. Dao, 22(1), 1-28.
Ames, R. T. (1983). Is Political Taoism Anarchism?. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 10(1), 27-47.
Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 8(1), 19-32.
Bates, D. (2017). Anarchism. In W. Paul (Eds.), Political Ideologies (pp. 128-159). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Bender, F. (1983). Taoism and Western anarchism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 10(1), 5-26.
Chi-Chao, L. (1930). History of Chinese political thought during the early Tsin period. London: Kegan Paul, Trench Trubner & Co., Ltd.
Clark, J. P. (1978). What is anarchism. In R. J. Pennock & J. W. Chapman (Eds.), Anarchism: Nomos XIX. New York: New York University Press.
Clark, J. P. (1983). On Taoism and Politics. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 10(1), 65-87.
Clarke, J. J. (2002). The Tao of the West: Western Tranformations of Taoist Thought. London: Routledge.
Flavel, S., & Hall, B. (2020). State Maternalism: Rethinking Anarchist Readings of the Daodejing. Dao, 19, 353-369.
Graham, A. (1989). Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical argument in ancient China. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Hall, D. L. (1983). The Metaphysics of Anarchism. Journal of Chinese Philosophy, 10(1), 49-63.
Hsu, Cho-Yun. (1965). Ancient China in Transition: An Analysis of Social Mobility 722–222 B.C. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Joshi, D. K. (2020). The other China model: Daoism, pluralism, and political liberalism. Polity, 52(4), 551-583.
Lai, K. (2008). An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Liu, J. (2006). An Introduction to Chinese Philosophy: From Ancient Philosophy to Chinese Buddhism. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Moran, D. (2002). Introduction to phenomenology. London: Routledge.
Peters, M. D., Godfrey, C. M., Khalil, H., McInerney, P., Parker, D., & Soares, C. B. (2015). Guidance for conducting systematic scoping reviews. JBI Evidence Implementation, 13(3), 141-146.
Rainey, L. D. (2014). Decoding Dao: Reading the dao de jing (tao te ching) and the zhuangzi (chuang tzu). Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
Rapp, J. A. (1998). Daoism and anarchism reconsidered. Anarchist Studies, 6(2), 123-151.
Stamatov, A. (2014). The Laozi and Anarchism. Asian Philosophy, 24(3), 260-278.
Zarrow, P. G. (1990). Anarchism and Chinese Political Culture. New York: Columbia University Press.
Zhongjiang, W. (1998). Daoist Philosophy: Modern Interpretations: Based on Yan Fu, Zhang Taiyan, Liang Qichao, Wang Guowei, and Hu Shi. Contemporary Chinese Thought, 30(1), 7-34.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Journal of Social Science Panyapat
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
