The Effect of an Evaluation of Teaching English Curricula Used Students’ Two Faculties in Rajamangala University of Technology Phra Nakorn

Main Article Content

Somsong Suparp

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate students in the Technical English course including  9 dimensions and 29 aspects, and to evaluate the contingency factors of context, input, process and product and compared it with the evaluation of the Technical English course based on CIPP model from two faculties – Engineering and Science and Technology.


The 120 samples used in this study were students registered in Technical English in the first semester of 2015 academic year from two faculties of RMUTP students. The research instrument was a questionnaire through descriptive statistics. The findings can be summarized as follows: there were 9 dimensions which included the following aspects: The result of this study revealed that there were 9 dimensions. The 8 dimensions were rather high.  However, dimension 4 was rather high, and even higher for students of Science and Technology.  The contingency of context, input, process and product factors of the course were all rather high.  The four dimensions were appropriated in terms of context, input, process and output at a high level.  The evaluation in this course from the two faculties’ students appropriated context, input, process and output at a high rate and increasing the sum total of learning.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

J. W. Best, Research in Education, 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J: Longman Higher Education, 1986.

D. Bonamy, Technical English 2 Course Book. Harlow, Essex: Pearson Education ESL, 2013.

C. S. Claxton and P. H. Murrell, Learning Styles: Implications for Improving Educational Practices. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1987. Washington, DC: Association for the Study of Higher Education, 1987.

L. J. Cronbach, The Dependability of Behavioral Measurement Theory of Generalizability for Scores and Profile, New York: Wiley Press, 1974.

M. Ellis and C. Johnson, Teaching Business English, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1994.

T. Hutchinson and A. Waters, English for Specific purposes, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.

J. W. Lee and D. L. Schallert, “The Relative Contribution of L2 Language Proficiency and L1 Reading Ability to L2 Reading Performance: A Test of the Threshold Hypothesis in an EFL Context,” TESOL Quarterly, vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 713–739.

P. Strevens, “ESP after Twenty Years: Are-appraisal,” in ESP: state of the art, M. L. Tickoo, Ed. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre, 1988.

D. L. Stufflebeam, and Shinkfield, A. J., Evaluation theory, models, & applications, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, 2007.

S. Sukamonlson, An Continuation and Appropriateness of English curricula Used in Different Faculties in Chulalongkorn University, Institute of Chulalongkorn University: Bangkok, 2004.

L. S. Vygotsky, The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky: Problems of General Psychology. New York: Springer US, 1987.