TAM-Based Analysis on ERP Learning of Non-IT Learners

Main Article Content

Paleerat Lakawathana

Abstract

Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) has become a mainstream protocol to integrate the data across an organization. Due to its increasing importance in the business world, many higher educational institutions have organized in-house ERP courses to educate their students including non-IT students (learners) to get ready for future careers. As the objectives of this study, it is interesting to understand how non-IT learners accept to use ERP software and what influences their learning achievement. Here, Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) was applied to analyze the technology acceptance of non-IT learners. The sample data was purposively collected from eighty-eight non-IT undergraduate students enrolled in ERP class at Thai-Nichi Institute of Technology (TNI). Using a path analysis, the influence of two primary TAM factors, perceived usefulness (PU) and perceived ease of use (PEU), was studied. The result shows that both TAM factors have a positive effect on usage intention, indicating the technology acceptance. Regarding the learning achievement by test scores; however, only perceived ease of use has a direct effect whereas perceived usefulness has no direct effect. Perceived usefulness has only the indirect effect on the achievement through the learners’ usage intention. Therefore, it is implicative that user-friendly software is required for non-IT learners to initiate the efforts for achieving the learning outcomes of ERP software.

Article Details

Section
Research Article

References

L.Columbus (Nov 15, 2016). ERP Market Share Update: SAP Solidifies Market Leadership [Online]. Available: https://www. forbes.com/sites/louiscolumbus/2013/05/12/2013-erp-market-share-update-sap-solidifies-market-leadership/#32ae813d1381

SAP University Alliance (2016). UA Around the World [Online]. Available: https://uaaroundtheworld.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/overview(bD1lbiZjPTEwMQ==)/start.htm

Y.H. Lee, K.A. Kozar, and K.R.T.Larsen, “The Technology Acceptance Model: Past, Present, and Future,” Communications of the association for information systems, vol. 12, pp.752-780, 2003.

M. Chuttur, “Overview of the Technology Acceptance Model: Origins, developments and future directions,” Sprounts: Working Papers on Information System, 9(37), Indiana University, 2009.

F.D. Davis, “A Technology Acceptance Model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: theory and results,” Ph.D. Thesis, MIT, December 1985.

S.Y.Park, “An analysis of the Technology Acceptance Model in understanding university students’ behavioral intention to use e-learning,” Education Technology & Society, 12 (3), pp.160-162, 2009.

W.C. Tsai, “A study of consumer behavioral intention to use e-book: the Technology Acceptance Model perspective,” Innovative Marketing, vol. 8, issue 4, pp. 55-66, 2012.

S. Ros, R. Hernandez, A. Caminero, A. Robles, I. Barbero, A. Macla and F.P. Holgado, “On the use of extended TAM to assess students’ acceptance and intent to use third-generation learning management systems,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 1250-1272, 2014.

F.D. Davis, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information Technology,” MIS Quarterly, pp. 319-340, September 1989.

V. Ventatesh and F.D. Davis, “A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: four longitudinal field studies,” Management science, vol. 46, no. 2, pp. 186-204, 2000.

S. Brown, A. Massey, M. Montaya-Weiss, and J. Burkman, “Do I really have to?. User acceptance of mandated technology,” European Journal of Information System, vol. 11, pp.283-295, 2002.