Outcomes of Business Social Responsibility Programs of Selected Semiconductor Companies in the Philippines

Main Article Content

Ria Liza C. Canlas
Corazon L. Magpayo
Anna Miranda
Wilfredo Caingcoy


          The rise of many semi-conductor companies was significant in the sub-urban areas of the Philippines as part of the government’s economic agenda. Revenue is impressive, in return, there are social and environment impacts as outcomes of their economic activities.

          This study addressed the outcomes of Business Social Responsibility (BSR) Programs of five selected semiconductor companies in the Philippines.

          Assessments were made by the employees, the researchers and the community. The research instrument was validated by thirty experts. Descriptive, correlational, and triangulation methods of research were employed. Elaboration Method with multiple correlations was used to test the mediation.

          Results of the study showed positive outcomes to stakeholders. Some differences were noted on the BSR outcomes reported by the companies against the report of the community. The BSR programs inhibited a pattern as low, moderate and extensive. The patterns of BSR programs account for the relationship between company profile and BSR outcomes.


Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

Research Article


[1] Aldaba, F., Philippine NGOs and multi-stakeholder partnerships: Three case studies. Voluntas International Journal of Voluntary and Non-profit Organizations, 13 (2), Jun 2002.

[2] Anonymous, Texas Instruments closes the loop in ambitious recycling effort. Environment Today. 4 (7), pp. 9, Jul 1993.

[3] Barnea, A, “Essays on corporate social responsibility,” Doctoral dissertation, University of British Columbia, Pro-quest Online, AAT NR10464, 2006.

[4] Barnea, A., Rubin, A., “Corporate social responsibility as a conflict between owners,” Working Paper, University of British Columbia, 2005

[5] Baron, R., Kenny, D, The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical consideration. Journal of Pe~nality and Social Psychology, pp. 1173-1182, 1986.

[6] Carroll, A., A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Academy of management Review, 4 (4), 497-525, 1979.

[7] Carroll, A., Corporate social Responsibility. Business & Society, 38 (3), pp. 268-295, 1999.

[8] Chapple, W., Moon, J., Corporate social responsibility (CSR) in Asia: A seven-country of CSR website reporting. Business & Society, 44 (4), pp. 415-441, 2005.

[9] Cooper, D., Schindler, P. Business Research Methods, 8th ed, McGraw Hill: New York, USA, 2003.

[10] David, P, Kline, S., Dai, Y., Corporate social responsibility practices, corporate identity, and purchase intention: A dualprocess model. Journal of Public Relations Research, 17 (3), pp. 291-313, 2005.

[11] De Colle, S., Gonella, C., “Corporate social responsibility: The need for an integrated management framework,” International Journal of Business Performance Management, 5 (2,3), p. 199, 2003

[12] Deri, C., Make alliances, not war, with crusading external stakeholders. Strategy & Leadership, 31 (5), p. 26, 2003.

[13] Esposito. A., “Intel chips in by `doing what's right’: Firm takes role of corporate citizen seriously,” Telegram & Gazette. E.1, Aug 21, 2005.

[14] Foster M., Meinhard, A., “Corporate social responsibility in the Canadian context: The new role of corporations in community involvement and social issues,” Working paper, Rverson University Faculty of Business, Center for Voluntary Sector Studies Series, 20, 3-17, 2002.

[15] Gupte, P., “Corporate Social Responsibility Detrimental to Stockholders Special to the Sun,” The New York Sun, Nov 16-18, 2007, 2005

[16] Heal, G., Garret, P., “Corporate Social Responsibility. An Economic and Financial Framework,” Columbia Business School, Dec 2004

[17] Holland, R.C., “Enforcement of, and compliance with environmental regulations at Department of Energy facilities,” doctoral dissertation: University of California, Pro-quest Online, AAT 0805465, 2003.

[18] Higginbottom, K., Doing It Right. Utility Week, 24 (16), 28, Dec 2005.

[19] Kirschner, M., Materially deficient. Electronic Business, 30 (8), p. 64, August 24, 2004.

[20] Lo, C., Egri, C., Ralston, D., Richards., M (2005)., “Commitment to corporate social and environmental responsibility: An Insight into contrasting perspectives in China and the U.S.,”, The Hongkong Polytechnic University, 1-47 https://www.polyu.edu.hk/fb/news/2006030 6-M/Lo-CSERChina-US.pdf), 2005

[21] Mackey, J.B., “International corporate social responsibility: Assessing United States-based multinationals’ location and globalization of operations,” doctoral dissertation, Pennsylvania State University, Pro-quest Online, AAT 3187539, 2005

[22] Marina, M.C., “Assessing the rate of return of the adoption of corporate social responsibility initiatives,” doctoral dissertation, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh Research Archive, 1842/810,

[23] Maximiano, J.M. (2004), The state of corporate social responsibility in the Philippines. Australian Association for Professional and Applied Ethics, http//www.unisa.edu.au/grewc/aapae/images/abstracts/maxi miano.pdf.

[24] Morag, I, “Intel incident-free culture: A case study. Applied Ergonomics”, 38 (2), 201, March, 2007

[25] Mudd, T., Sleeping Beauty. Industry Week, 251 (7), 64, Aug 2002.

[26] Quazi , A., O’Brien, D, “An Empirical Test of Cross-national Model of Corporate Social Responsibility,” Journal of Business Ethics, 25 (1), 33, May 2000.

[27] Roberts, K., Take responsibility for a better future. Works Management, 59 (9), 29, Sep 2006.

[28] Schnietz, K, Epstein, M, “Does Corporate Social Responsibility Pay Off? Evidence from the Failed’” 1999 WTO Meeting in Seattle. Graziadio Business Report, Volume No. 7 Issue 2, 2004.

[29] Scholder Ellen, P., Webb, D., Mohr, L., “Building Corporate Associations: Consumer Attributions for Corporate Socially Responsible Programs,” Journal of the Academy of Marketing
Science, 34, 147 – 157, 2006.

[30] Seifert, et. al., “Comparing Big Givers and Small Givers: Firms at Correlates of Corporate Philanthropy”, Volume No. 45 Issue No. 3, July 2003.

[31] Sincich, T, Business Statistics by Example, 5th ed, Prentice Hall: New Jersey,USA , p. 85; pp. 1090-1091, 1996

[32] Stanwick, P., Stanwick, S., „The relationship between corporate social performance, and organizational size, financial performance, and environmental performance: An empirical examination,” Journal of Business Ethics, 17 (2), pp. 195-204, Jan 1998.

[33] Turban, D., Greening, D., “Corporate social performance and organizational attractiveness to prospective employees,” Academy of Management Journal, 40 (3), 658-672, Jun 1997.

[34] Waddock, S., Graves, S., “The corporate social performance –Financial performance link,” Strategic Management Journal, 18 (4), 303-31, 1996.

[35] Ward, A., “Coke joins battle for the brand corporate responsibility: The drinks maker is adopting a proactive approach to social issues after a barrage of negative headlines’” Financial Times, p. 10, Nov 21, 2006.

[36] York, R., Rosa, E., Dietz, T., “Footprints on the Earth: The Environmental Consequences of Modernity,” American Sociological Review, 68 (2), pp. 279-300 Apr 2003.

[37] (2007) Philippines Business Registry. Available: https://www.business.gov.ph/Investment_OpportunityInBusiness_SectoralProfiles.php?contentID=1

[38] MCH International. Available: https://www.mhcinternational.com/measurement.htm

[39] The Manila Times. Available: https://www.manilatimes.net/national/2005/aug/04/yehey/top_stories/20050804top9.html

[40] Greenpeace. Available: https://www.greenpeace.org/seasia/en/news/toxic _threat_in_th_rp

[41] (2006) Basel Action Network. Available: https://www.ban.org/Library/Features/060702_rising_ewaste.html

[42] Manalac, Sharon. Electronic Waste: A Threat in the Future. Available: https://www.interdisciplinary.net/ptb/ejgc/ejgc3/manalac%20paper.pdf

[43] Global Product Chains: Northern Consumers, https://www.iisd.org/susprod/semicon.htm

[44] A Sector Conducive to Growth. Available: https://www.summitreports.com/philippines/electronics.htm

[45] SEIPI website. Available: https://www.seipi.org.ph/about.htm

[46] The Intel Corporation website. Available: https://www.intel.com/

[47] (1995-2009) Texas Instruments website. Available: https://www.ti.com/

[48] (2009) Toshiba America Inc website. Available: https://www.toshiba. com/

[49] (2006-2009) The NXP Semiconductor website. Available: https://www.nxp.com/

[50] (2004) Republic Act 9275. Available: https://www.lawphil.net/statutes/repacts/ra2004/ra_9275_2004.html

[51] (1996-2009)Berkeley.Available: https://www.haas.berkeley.edu/responsiblebusiness/conference/documents/AmirRubinFinalpaper.pdf

[52] (2004) KLM Inc. Available: https://www.klminc.com/branding/new-brand-man.html

[53] (1996-2009) Original data provided by iSuppli in November 2005. Available:https://www.geek.com/news/geeknews/2005Dec/bch2005120 2033584.htm

[54] (1997-2009) The EDN website. Available: https://www.edn.com/

[55] (2005) Top 25 Semiconductor Market Share Ranking. Available: https://i.cmpnet.com/eetimes/seminews/chart1_120105.gif

[56] (2207) Business Ethics. Available: https://www.business-ethics.com/BE100_2005

[57] (2205) Business Ethics. Available: https://www.thecro.com/files/2005 List.pdf

[58] Siegel, Donald et al (2005) An Empirical Analysis of the Strategic Use of Corporate Social Responsibility. Available: https://mba.tuck.dartmouth.edu/mechanisms/pages/Papers/CSRSiegelVitaliano101105.pdf