Guidelines for enhancing the role of Thai Universities to driving cities towards sustainable learning cities

Authors

  • Vorachai Viphoouparakhot bangkokthonburi university

Keywords:

Enhancing the role Thai universities, Participation of stakeholders, Driving cities, Sustainable Learning City

Abstract

This study aimed to (1) analyze the role of entrepreneurial universities in promoting multi-sectorial participation for the development of sustainable learning cities and (2) investigate the causal relationships influencing participation as a mediator between the role of universities and the development of sustainable learning cities. The research employed a multi-stage sampling method to select 450 respondents who were mid- and senior-level administrators from Thai public universities. Data were collected through a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics, inferential statistics, factor analysis, and path analysis. Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) was conducted via AMOS software to assess model fit, with hypotheses tested at a 95% confidence level. The findings revealed that the role of entrepreneurial universities had a direct positive influence on multi-sectorial participation, which in turn significantly impacted the development of sustainable learning cities. The analytical model demonstrated high goodness-of-fit indices, confirming its suitability. Furthermore, the role of entrepreneurial universities was found to exert both direct and indirect positive effects on sustainable learning city development. The study recommends that universities enhance innovation ecosystems, foster stakeholder engagement, and promote lifelong learning initiatives to drive the sustainable transformation of cities into learning cities.

References

เฉลิมชัย บุญยะลีพรรณและคณะ (2565). ความเหลื่อมลํ้าทางสังคมของไทย ในมิติด้านการศึกษา เศรษฐกิจ และสาธารณสุข.วารสารสังคมศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยศรีนครินทรวิโรฒ. 25(2). 240-261.

สุบรรณ เอี่ยมวิจารณ์และสุธินี อัตถากร (2567). เมืองแห่งการเรียนรู้ : แนวคิดการพัฒนาและสร้างความรู้เพื่อการพัฒนาเมืองอย่างยั่งยืน. วารสารสถาบันวิจัยและพัฒนา. มหาวิทยาลัยราชภัฏมหาสารคาม, 11(1). 851-864.

สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการอุดมศึกษา. (2561). แผนการศึกษาแห่งชาติ พ.ศ. 2560-2579. สำนักงานคณะกรรมการการอุดมศึกษา.

สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2565). แผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 13. สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ.

Apostol, S. (2022). Universities in Today’s World-between the Potential Regional Growth and Market Economy Absorption. Management & Marketing. 17(s1), 449-470

Altbach, P. G., & Knight, J. (2007). The Internationalization of Higher Education: Motivations and Realities. Journal of Studies in International Education, 11(3-4), 290-305.

Abreu, M. & Grinevich, V. (2024). The Entrepreneurial University: Strategies, Processes, and Competing Goals. The Journal of Technology Transfer. 49.1991-2034. Retrieved from https:// doi.org/ 10. 1007/s10961-024-10085-7

Audretsch, D. B., et.al. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford University Press.

Bryman, A. (2011). Leadership in organizations. Sage.

Cai, Y., & Ahmad, I. (2023). From an Entrepreneurial University to a Sustainable Entrepreneurial University: Conceptualization and Evidence in the Contexts of European University Reforms. Higher Education Policy. 36, 20–52.

Chong Peng & Hongwei Xu. (2024). Universities and Cities: The Impact of Higher Education on Urban Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and Economic Growth. Asian Economic Papers, 23(2), 33–56

De Wit, H. (2011). Trends, Issues, and Challenges in Internationalization of Higher Education. Centre for Applied Research on Economics and Management.

Dill, D. D. (2005). The Public Good, the Market, and Quality Assurance: a Conceptual Framework for Higher Education Policy. Higher Education, 49(1-2), 71-91.

Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and Mode 2 to aTriple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109-123.

Fayolle, A., & Gailly, B. (2008). From Craft to Science: Teaching Models and Learning Processes in Entrepreneurship Education. Journal of European Industrial Training, 32(7), 569-593.

Facer, K., & Buchczyk, M. (2019). Towards a Research Agenda for the Actually Existing Learning City. Oxford Review of Education, 45(2), 151-167.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating Structural Equation Models with Unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50.

Gibb, A. A. (2002). In Pursuit of a New Enterprise and Entrepreneurship Paradigm for Learning: Creative Destruction, New Values, New Ways of Doing Things, and New Combinations of Knowledge. International Journal of Management Reviews, 4(3), 233-269.

Hair, J. F., et.al.(2012). Multivariate data analysis (7th Ed.). Pearson.

Kearns, P (2012). EcCoWell: Living and Learning in Sustainable Opportunity cities, Retrieved from http://pie.pascalobservatory. org.

Kirby, D. A. (2006). Creating Entrepreneurial Universities in the UK: Applying Entrepreneurship Theory to Practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 599-603.

Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling. Guilford Press.

Li, X., et.al. (2022). University-Industry Cooperation and Regional Economic Convergence: The Role of Human Capital. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 13(2), 456-478.

Longworth, N (1999). Making Lifelong Learning work: Learning cities for a Learning century, Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.

Marozau, R., et.al. (2021). Impacts of universities in different stages of economic development: a cross-country analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 12(1), 1-21.

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd Ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Peng, C., & Xu, H. (2024). Universities and Cities: The Impact of Higher Education on Urban Innovation, Entrepreneurship, and economic growth. Asian Economic Papers, 23(2), 33–56.

Perkmann, M., et.al. (2013). Academic engagement and commercialization: A review of the literature on university–industry relations. Research Policy, 42(2), 423–442.

Pittaway, L., & Cope, J. (2007). Entrepreneurship Education: A Systematic Review of the Evidence. International Small Business Journal, 25(5), 479–510.

Pfeffer, J., & Salancik, G. R. (2003). The external control of organizations: A resource dependence perspective. Stanford University Press.

Polishchuk, Y., et.al. (2021). University Impact on Regional Development in the Context of Smart Specialization. Education of Economists and Managers, 59(1), 59–83.

Saha, N., et.al. (2020). Entrepreneurial Universities and Regional Innovation Systems: a Strategic role in Innovation-driven Economic growth. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 12–24.

Senge, P. M. (1990). The fifth discipline: The art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday.

UNESCO (2024). UNESCO Global Network of Learning Cities. Retrieved from https://www.uil.unesco. org/en/learning-cities.

United Nation (2024). THE 17 GOALS - Sustainable Development Goals. Retrieved from https://sdgs. un.org/goals

Wright, M., et.al. (2007). Academic entrepreneurship in Europe. Edward Elgar Publishing.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-25

How to Cite

Viphoouparakhot, V. (2024). Guidelines for enhancing the role of Thai Universities to driving cities towards sustainable learning cities. APHEIT JOURNAL, 30(2), 137–153. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/apheit-ss/article/view/279554