Relationship between collaborative leadership of administrators and organizational commitment of teachers under the Office of Vocational Education in Chachoengsao Province
Keywords:
Collaborative leadership, organizational commitment, Office of vocational education, Chachoengsao provinceAbstract
This survey study examined the level of collaborative leadership among administrators under the Office of Vocational Education in Chachoengsao Province, the level of teachers’ organizational commitment, and the relationship between these variables. The population consisted of 205 teachers in the 2025 academic year, and a sample of 136 teachers was determined using the Krejcie and Morgan sample size table. Data were collected through a five-point Likert scale questionnaire and analyzed using descriptive statistics and Pearson’s product-moment correlation coefficient. The findings revealed that both administrators’ collaborative leadership and teachers’ organizational commitment were at a high level overall and across all dimensions. Moreover, collaborative leadership was positively associated with teachers’ organizational commitment at the .01 level, with a high correlation coefficient of .79. These results provide empirical support for the importance of collaborative leadership in strengthening teachers’ commitment to their organizations. The findings also suggest that educational administrators can promote teacher participation and foster sustainable organizational commitment through collaborative leadership practices.
References
กฤษณพงศ์ กีรติกร. (2557). ผู้นำกับการ เปลี่ยนแปลงการศึกษาไทย. สกสค.
กาญจนา แก้วเทพ. (2561). ภาวะผู้นำทางการศึกษา. จุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
กุลชาติ วงษ์คำจันทร์. (2550). ปรัชญาการศึกษา. โรงพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
คุรุสภา. (2554). มาตรฐานวิชาชีพทางการศึกษา. คุรุสภา.
ชูศักดิ์ เอกเพชร. (2561). ความผูกพันในองค์กรของข้าราชการครูในสถานศึกษาขั้นพื้นฐาน. วารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ มหาวิทยาลัยนเรศวร, 20(3), 85-101
ณัฐวุฒิ เกษมสุข. (2564). ความสัมพันธ์ระหว่างภาวะผู้นำแบบมีส่วนร่วมกับความผูกพันในองค์กรของครูในโรงเรียนขนาดใหญ่. วารสารวิจัยการบริหารการศึกษา, 13(1), 112–121.
ทิศนา แขมมณี. (2563). ศาสตร์การสอน: องค์ความรู้เพื่อการจัดการเรียนรู้ที่มีประสิทธิภาพ (พิมพ์ครั้งที่ 15).สำนักพิมพ์แห่งจุฬาลงกรณ์มหาวิทยาลัย.
บุญชม ศรีสะอาด. (2551). การบริหารแบบมีส่วนร่วม. สุวีริยาสาส์น.
Bass, B. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2014). Improving organizational effectiveness through transformational leadership. SAGE Publications.
Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2021). School leadership models: What do we know? School Leadership and Management Network.
Day, C., Gu, Q., & Sammons, P. (2022). The impact of leadership on student outcomes: How successful school leaders use transformational and instructional strategies to make a difference. Educational Administration Quarterly, 58(2), 275–306.
Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. (2002). Trust in leadership: Meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.611
Edmondson, A. C. (1999). Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(2), 350–383. https://doi.org/10.2307/2666999
Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (2012). Professional capital: Transforming teaching in every school. Teachers College Press.
Harris, A. (2004). Distributed leadership and school improvement: Leading or misleading? Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 32(1), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/1741143204039297
Harris, A., & Spillane, J. P. (2008). Distributed leadership through the looking glass. Management in Education, 22(1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1177/0892020607085623
Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33(4), 692–724. https://doi.org/10.2307/256287
Kouzes, J. M., & Posner, B. Z. (2012). The leadership challenge (5th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Likert, R. (1967). The human organization: Its management and value. McGraw-Hill.
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1990). The measurement and antecedents of affective, continuance, and normative commitment to the organization. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 63(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8325.1990.tb00506.x
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/1053-4822(91)90011-Z
Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. SAGE Publications.
Nembhard, I. M., & Edmondson, A. C. (2006). Making it safe: The effects of leader inclusiveness and professional status on psychological safety and improvement efforts in health care teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(7), 941–966. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.413
Northouse, P. G. (2021). Leadership: Theory and practice (9th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2017). Organizational behavior (17th ed.). Pearson.
Spillane, J. P. (2006). Distributed leadership. Jossey-Bass.
Yukl, G. (2013). Leadership in organizations (8th ed.). Pearson Education.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 จักรพันธุ์ วังทองชุก, วรชัย วิภูอปุรโคตร
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
