The More Familiar You Are, The Less You Will Buy:The Moderating Effect of Relationship Strength

Authors

  • Chenicha Praphruetmon Bangkok University
  • Nata Tubtimcharoon -

Keywords:

Suitability, Key Opinion Leader, Continuance of Watching, Relationship Strength, Purchase Intent

Abstract

With the rapid expansion of internet technology, the user base of live broadcast platforms has been steadily increasing. This surge in online activity has led to a growing trend of consumers turning to live broadcasts for product information before making purchasing decisions. Key Opinion Leaders (KOLs) who live stream have become central figures in this virtual landscape, prompting extensive research into the dynamics of relationship strength within these platforms. In light of this, our study centers on KOL live broadcasts and explores the moderating effect of relationship strength on the continuity of viewer engagement and its impact on audience purchase intention.

We collected data from 251 respondents and employed questionnaire surveys along with structural equation modeling for analysis. Our findings reveal a positive correlation between the suitability of KOLs and live broadcast products, and viewers’ sustained engagement. Additionally, continuity of viewership positively influences purchase intentions. Furthermore, varying levels of relationship positively strength significantly moderate the impact of sustained viewership, with audiences potentially being swayed by different relationship dynamics in the information presented during live broadcasts.

References

Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16, 74-94.

Bansal, H. S., & Voyer, P. A. (2000). Word-of-mouth processes within a services purchase decision context. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 166-177.

Brand, C., Schwanen, T., & Anable, J. (2020). ‘Online Omnivores’ or ‘Willing but struggling’? Identifying online grocery shopping behavior segments using attitude theory. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 1-18.

Chen, Y., & Chang, S. (2021). The effect of influencer influence on recommendation intention: Focused on TikTok live commerce in China. IJasC, 3(3), 15-26.

Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336.

Elmashhara, M. G., & Soares, A. M. (2020). The influence of atmospherics general interior variables on shoppers’ emotions and behavior. The International Review of Retail,

Distribution and Consumer Research, 30(4), 437-459. Fan, X., & Sivo, S. A. (2007). Sensitivity of fit indices to model misspecification and model types. multivariate behavioral Research, 42(3), 509-529.

Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50.

Fu, X., Pang, J., & Gursoy, D. (2022). Effects of online commercial friendships on customer revenge following a service failure. Journal of Business Research, 153, 102-114.

Granovetter, M. S. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), 1360-1380.

Gupta, A., Yousaf, A., & Mishra, A. (2020). How pre-adoption expectancies shape postadoption continuance intentions: An extended expectation-confirmation model. International Journal of Information Management, 52, 1-13.

Horng, S.-M., & Wu, C.-L. (2020). How behaviors on social network sites and online social capital influence social commerce intentions. Information & Management, 57(2), 1-13.

Hu, K. (2022). Social media influencers in China: A systematic review. methodology, 18, 126-136.

Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55.

Islami, N. N., Wahyuni, S., & Tiara, T. (2020). The effect of digital marketing on organizational performance through intellectual capital and perceived quality in micro, small and medium enterprises. Journal organisasi Dan manajemen, 16(1), 59-70.

Jain, L., & Katarya, R. (2019). Discover opinion leader in online social network using frefly algorithm. expert systems with applications, 122, 1-15.

Jiménez-Castillo, D., & Sánchez-Fernández, R. (2019). The role of digital influencers in brand recommendation: Examining their impact on engagement, expected value and purchase intention. International Journal of Information Management, 49, 366-376.

Jones, M. A., & Reynolds, K. E. (2006). The role of retailer interest on shopping behavior. Journal of Retailing, 82(2), 115-126.

Khalid, K., Abdullah, H. H., & Kumar M, D. (2012). Get along with the quantitative research process. International Journal of Research in Management, 2(2), 15-29.

Kim, S., Kandampully, J., & Bilgihan, A. (2018). The influence of eWOM communications: An application of online social network framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 243-254.

Kim, S. J., & Heo, C. M. (2021). Effects of live commerce and show host attributes on purchase intention: Including the mediating effects of content flow. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Venturing and Entrepreneurship, 16(3), 177-191.

Korzynski, P., Paniagua, J., & Rodriguez-Montemayor, E. (2019). Employee creativity in a digital era: The mediating role of social media. management Decision, 58(6), 1100-1117.

Ledesma, R., Molina Ibañez, G., & Valero Mora, P. (2002). Internal consistency analysis by means of Cronbach’s Alpha: A computer program based on dynamic graphics. Psico-Usf, 7(2), 143-152.

Li, N., Huang, Q., Ge, X., He, M., Cui, S., Huang, P., & Fung, S.-F. (2021). A review of the research progress of social network structure. Complexity, 2021, 1-14.

Li, Y., & Peng, Y. (2021). Influencer marketing: Purchase intention and its antecedents. marketing Intelligence & Planning, 39(7), 960-978.

Liu, Y., Li, Q., Edu, T., Jozsa, L., & Negricea, I. C. (2019). Mobile shopping platform

characteristics as consumer behavior determinants. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(7), 1565-1587.

Luo, A., Baker, A., & Donthu, N. (2019). Capturing dynamics in the value for brand recommendations from word-of-mouth conversations. Journal of Business Research, 104, 247-260.

Pornsrimate, K., & Khamwon, A. (2020). Building brand evangelism through social media micro-influencers: A case study of cosmetic industry in Thailand. International Journal of Social Science Research, 2(3), 84-99.

Praphruetmon, C. (2022). Consumers pursuing a sense of social presence: Emotional engagement or functional engagement. Panyapiwat Journal, 14(2), 16-31.

Singh, S., Singh, N., Kalinić, Z., & Liébana-Cabanillas, F. J. (2021). Assessing determinants influencing continued use of live streaming services: An extended perceived value theory of streaming addiction. expert systems with applications, 168, 1-16.

Sun, H., Zhang, Y., & Chen, J. (2020). The influence of credibility of online reviews on consumer' trust: The moderating role of uncertainty. management Review, 32(4), 146-159.

Tang, X. M., & Lai, S. (2020). How does counter-rumor affect audience’s perceived credibility: Moderating effect of information involvement. China Academic Journal Electronic Publishing House, 42(8), 27-48.

Wang, M.-Y., Zhang, P.-Z., Zhou, C.-Y., & Lai, N.-Y. (2019). Effect of emotion, expectation, and privacy on purchase intention in WeChat health product consumption: The mediating role of trust. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 16(20),

-19.

Winter, S., & Neubaum, G. (2016). Examining characteristics of opinion leaders in social media: A motivational approach. social media+ society, 2(3), 1-12.

Wongkitrungrueng, A., Dehouche, N., & Assarut, N. (2020). Live streaming commerce from the sellers’ perspective: Implications for online relationship marketing. Journal of Marketing Management, 36(5-6), 488-518.

Downloads

Published

2024-05-31

How to Cite

Praphruetmon, C., & Tubtimcharoon, . N. . (2024). The More Familiar You Are, The Less You Will Buy:The Moderating Effect of Relationship Strength. Journal of ASEAN PLUS Studies, 5(1), 84–105. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/aseanplus/article/view/272965