Guidelines for Developing Learner Attributes for Global Citizenship and Intercultural Understanding through Quality Education

Authors

  • Piyanun Klaichun School of Education, Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand
  • Pratoomtong Trirat Faculty of Liberal Arts, Krirk University, Thailand
  • Seksan Sakonthawat Assumption College Rayong, Thailand
  • Sornsiri Voravarn School of Education, Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand
  • Yifei Fan School of Education, Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand
  • Thunwita Sirivorapat Puthpongsiriporn Faculty of Business Administration, Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand
  • Nittaya Kerdyam The ofce of General Education, Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand
  • Prawit Srinongwa Panyapiwat Institute of Management Demonstration School, Thailand
  • Zeyuan Yu International Chinese College, Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand
  • Guo Xiujin International Chinese College, Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand
  • Napat Kamthonsiriwimol Innovative Agriculture and Management, Panyapiwat Institute of Management, Thailand

Keywords:

Participatory administration, Information system structuring, Digital transformation

Abstract

The objectives of this study were: 1) to examine the current and desired conditions of academic administration with a focus on learner attributes aligned with global citizenship, aiming to promote desirable characteristics and cultural understanding within the ASEAN community and 2) to propose academic administration guidelines that emphasize these attributes to foster intercultural competence. This quantitative research involved 322 school administrators and teachers from schools under Assumption College, Rayong. 296 questionnaires were distributed, with a 92% response rate. The sampling method was simple random sampling. The research instrument was a questionnaire with an Index of Item-Objective Congruence (IOC) ranging from 0.66 to 1.00 and a reliability coefficient of 0.826. Data collection was conducted online. Quantitative data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequency, percentage, mean, and standard deviation. A needs analysis was performed using the modified Priority Needs Index (PNI modified). Qualitative data were analyzed through content analysis and analytical description. Findings indicated that the overall current condition of academic administration was moderate. The development of media and learning resources received the highest ratings, followed by academic personnel development, while instructional management received the lowest ratings. In terms of desired conditions, instructional management ranked highest, followed by supervision and evaluation, while academic planning ranked lowest, though still at a high level. The top priority needs identified were instructional management, supervision and assessment, and curriculum and learning activity development. Based on the findings, three key guidelines for academic administration were proposed: 1) Develop diverse learning activities that encourage participation, idea expression, and collaborative learning. 2) Implement varied assessment methods that address learners’ skills, attitudes, and desirable attributes. 3) Enhance personnel’s knowledge and understanding of global citizenship, the ASEAN community, and cultural diversity.

References

Cogan and Derricott. (1998). Citizenship for the 21st century: An international perspective on education. Kogan Page.

Ministry of Education (2022). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives. Print Media Center Suan Sunandha Rajabhat University.

Office of the Basic Education Commission (OBEC) (2018). Guidelines for developing an educational quality assurance system B.E.2018. The Office of the Basic Education Commission (OBEC).

Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2019). P21 framework for 21st century learning. https://www.battelleforkids.org/our-work/p21/p21-framework

Phoolphon, P. (2011). The development of an academic administration model in basic education schools to prepare students for global citizenship. Chulalongkorn University Press.

Praphasanonobon, A. (2021). Global citizenship education: Topics and learning objectives.https://thepotential.org/knowledge/global-citizenship-education/

Rakpolmuang, C., Israngura Na Ayudhya, W., & Fueang-arun, F. a. (2018). Guidelines for promoting global citizenship–international experiences. Office of Research and Educational Development, Office of the Education Council, Ministry of Education.

Sutthipiboon, S., & Prapruetnok, P. (2022). The development of teacher competency in learning management to promote ASEAN citizenship for students in the 21st century. Journal of Education, Srinakharinwirot University, 24(3), 123-140.

Wongwanich, S. (2007). Needs assessment research. Chulalongkorn University Press.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Klaichun, P., Trirat, P. ., Sakonthawat, S. ., Voravarn, S. ., Fan, Y. ., Sirivorapat Puthpongsiriporn, T. ., Kerdyam, N. ., Srinongwa, P. ., Yu, Z. ., Xiujin, G. ., & Kamthonsiriwimol, N. . (2025). Guidelines for Developing Learner Attributes for Global Citizenship and Intercultural Understanding through Quality Education. Journal of ASEAN PLUS Studies, 6(1), 93–101. retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/aseanplus/article/view/285539