Experiences of Action Research Component in the B.Ed. (Hons) Programme

Main Article Content

Munir Lalani

Abstract

The implementation of the action research component as per Higher Education Commission’s guidelines and Karachi University’s scheme of studies for B.Ed (Hons) programme was the first experience for Notre Dame Institute of Education (NDIE). This research study aimed to explore perceived experiences of the students and their research supervisors on the effectiveness of action research component as implemented in NDIE for the B.Ed (Hons) students using exploratory case study design. The data was collected using semi structured interviews taken from the 7 students and 2 research supervisors using purposive sampling strategy. The thematic analysis of the data guided by the research questions helped in drawing conclusion and recommendations for the study. Overall, the participants viewed action research component playing a major role in helping them become practitioner researchers. The strengths and weaknesses identified by the participants provide insights to enhance the quality of learning opportunities pertaining to action research for the future cohorts.

Article Details

How to Cite
Lalani, M. (2021). Experiences of Action Research Component in the B.Ed. (Hons) Programme. Asia Social Issues, 14(5), Article 247745 (17 pages). Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/asi/article/view/247745
Section
Research Article

References

Ali, P., Watson, P., & Dhingra, K. (2016). Postgraduate research students’ and their supervisors’ attitudes towards supervision. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 11, 227-241.

Allen, R. E. S., & Wiles, J. L. (2016). A rose by any other name: Participants choosing research pseudonyms. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 13(2), 149-165.

Amin, M. Z. M., Rashid, R. A., & Teh, K. S. M. (2019). Investigating issues and challenges in employing action research for teacher training in malaysian context. International Journal of Education and Practice, 7(1), 30-40.

Aras, S. (2021). Action research as an inquiry-based teaching practice model for teacher education programs. Systemic Practice and Action Research, 34(1), 153-168.

Bacal, R. (2020). The role of the facilitator: Understanding what facilitators really do! Retrieved from http://work911.com/articles/facil.htm

Borg, S. (2017). Action research and teacher identity. Cambridge English: Research Notes, 68, 3-4.

Bognar, B., & Krumes, I. (2017). Encouraging reflection and critical friendship in preservice teacher education. CEPS Journal, 7(3), 87-112.

Borup, J., Chambers, C. B., & Stimson, R. (2019). K-12 student perceptions of online teacher and on-site facilitator support in supplemental online courses. Online Learning, 23(4), 253-280.

Bouma, G. (2004). The research process (3rd eds.). Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.

Burns, A., & Westmacott, A. (2018). Teacher to researcher: Reflections on a new action research program for university EFL teachers. Profile Issues in Teachers Professional Development, 20(1), 15-23.

Campbell, K. H. (2013). A call to action: why we need more practitioner research. A response to a teacher educator uses action research to develop culturally conscious curriculum planners. Democracy and Education, 21(2), 7.

Crow, G., & Wiles, R. (2008). Managing anonymity and confidentiality in social research: The case of visual data in Community research. ESRC National Centre for Research Methods.

Dikilitaş, K., & Comoglu, I. (2020). Pre-service English teachers’ reflective engagement with stories of exploratory action research. European Journal of Teacher Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2020.1795123

Fraenkel, J. R., Wallen, N. E., & Hyun, H. H. (2012). How to design and evaluate research in education. London, UK: McGraw Hill.

Garcia, L. M., & Roblin, N. P. (2008). Innovation, research and professional development in higher education: Learning from our own experience. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24(1), 104-116.

Gay, L. R., Mills, G. E., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research: competencies for analysis and application (10th eds.). New Jersey, USA: Merrill Prentice Hall.

Gulab, F., & Sharjeel, M. Y. (2019). Perception of pre-service (B. Ed) teachers pertaining to effectiveness of pair teaching and mentoring during practicum. Journal of Social Sciences and Media Studies, 3(1), 79-87.

Gupta, S. (2019). Perceptions and experiences of B.ED. students about internship and sessional work. MIER Journal of Educational Studies, Trends and Practices, 9(1), 109-120.

Halai, N. (2011). How teachers become action researchers in Pakistan: Emerging patterns from a qualitative metasynthesis. Educational action research, 19(2), 201-214.

HEC. (2010). Curriculum of education. B.Ed. 4-year degree programme (elementary, secondary), associate degree in education, MS/M.Ed. Education-revised 2010. Islamabad: Higher Education Commission. Retrieved from, http://www.hec.gov.pk/InsideHEC/Divisions/AECA/CurriculumRevision/Documents/Education-2010.pdf

Keegan, R. (2016). Action research as an agent for enhancing teaching and learning in physical education: A physical education teacher’s perspective. The Physical Educator, 73(2), 255-284.

Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2011). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (pp.567-606). 2nd eds. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Kitchen, J., & Stevens, D. (2008). Action research in teacher education: Two teacher-educators practice action research as they introduce action research to preservice teachers. Action Research, 6(1), 7-28.

Labra, O., Castro, C., Wright, R., & Chamblas, I. (2019). Thematic analysis in social work: A case study, global social work - Cutting edge issues and critical reflections. Retrieved from https://www.intechopen.com/books/global-social-work-cutting-edge-issues-and-critical-reflections/thematic-analysis-in-social-work-a-case-study

Lattimer, H. (2012). Action research in pre-service teacher education: is there value added? ie: inquiry in education, 3(1), 1-25.

Palinkas, L. A., Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533-544.

Phillips, D. K., & Carr, K. (2010). Becoming a teacher through action research. New York, USA.

Rizvi, S. (2010). A transnational approach to educational leadership capacity building: A case study of the Masters of Education programme at Notre Dame Institute of Education. Karachi, Pakistan.

Ryan, T. G., Young, D. C., & Kraglund-Gauthier, W. L. (2017). Action research within pre-service teacher education. Transformative Dialogues: Teaching & Learning Journal, 10(3), 1-18.

Schneider, A. T. (1997). A study of an innovative approach to teacher education in Pakistan (Doctoral dissertations). Australia: University of Melbourne.

Saunders, B., Kitzinger, J., & Kitzinger, C. (2015). Anonymising interview data: Challenges and compromise in practice. Qualitative Research, 15(5), 616-632.

Smith, R. (2020). Mentoring teacher-research: Challenges and benefits according to Nepali mentors. Retrieved from https://www. teachingenglish.org.uk/sites/teacheng/files/

MentoringTeacherResearchReport2020.pdf

Tolich, M. (2004). Internal confidentiality: When confidentiality assurances fail relational informants. Qualitative Sociology, 27(1), 101-106.

Thalho, N., & Gomos, Y. D. (2020). Perception and practices of action research by prospective teachers in teacher education institutions in Pakistan. Journal of Educational Research in Developing Areas, 1(1), 57-67.

Thomas, M. (2008). Using PBL to enhance student teachers’ science content knowledge. Journal of Research, 2(1), 66-91.

Vaughan, M., & Burnaford, G. (2016). Action research in graduate teacher education: A review of the literature 2000-2015. Educational Action Research, 24(2), 280-299.

Yan, C. (2017). You never know what research is like unless you’ve done it! Action research to promote collaborative student-teacher research. Educational Action Research, 25(5), 704-719.

Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research design and methods (5th eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Yiğitoğlu, N., & Dollar, Y. K. (2018). Incorporating action research into in-service teacher education (INSET) programs. Çukurova University Faculty of Education Journal, 47(2), 694-709.

Zuber-Skerritt, O. (2018). An educational framework for participatory action learning and action research (PALAR). Educational Action Research, 26(4), 513-532.