The Application of Think-Pair-Share to Enhance Learning Achievement and Learning Satisfaction in Social studies of Grade Six Bhutanese Students

Main Article Content

Tashi Dorji
Nipaporn Chalermnirundorn

Abstract

This study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of Think-Pair-Share strategy on students’ learning achievement and learning satisfaction of grade six Bhutanese students in social studies. A mixed method was used to examine the learning achievement using Think-Pair-Share and to find out their learning satisfaction in social studies. The target group consisting of 31 grade six students was selected to participate in this study as the research school had only one section of grade six. The instruments used to gather the quantitative and qualitative data were four lesson plans, achievement tests (pretest and posttest) and semi-structured interview, respectively. The quantitative data gathered through the pretest and the posttest were analyzed using sample paired t-test based on mean, SD and significant value. The qualitative data collected through semi-structured interview was analyzed using thematic analysis. The result of the pretest and the posttest score analysis showed a significant difference between the posttest mean (x̅ = 17.3) and pretest mean (x̅ = 12) with the mean difference of 5.3. The significant value for the group was .001, indicating a significant increase in the posttest scores as compared to the pretest. Similarly, the data analyzed from the semi-structured interview confirmed that students derived positive learning satisfaction. Hence, the TPS strategy supports learning social studies of grade six Bhutanese students.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dorji, T., & Chalermnirundorn, N. . (2021). The Application of Think-Pair-Share to Enhance Learning Achievement and Learning Satisfaction in Social studies of Grade Six Bhutanese Students. Asia Social Issues, 14(5), Article 249105 (19 pages). Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/asi/article/view/249105
Section
Research Article

References

Abass, F. (2008). cooperative learning and motivation. Aichi University Bulletin: Language and Culture, 18(1), 15-35.

Aboagye, I. B. (2012). The effect of an active learning approach on grade xi learners’ achievement in newton’s laws of motion. A case study of a school in the Eastern Cap ‘E. Africa: University of South Africa.

Agung, L. (2018). Character education integration in social studies learning. Historia: Jurnal Pendidik dan Peneliti Sejarah, 12(2), 392-403.

Alber, R. (2014). 6 Scaffolding strategies to use with your students. Retrieved from https://www.edutopia.org/blog/scaffolding-lessons-six-strategies-rebecca-alber

Aydede, M. N., & Matyar, F. (2009). The effect of active learning approach in science teaching on cognitive level of student achievement. Journal of Turkish Science Education, 6(1), 115-127.

Bamiro, A. O. (2015). Effects of guided discovery and think-pair-share strategies on secondary school students’ achievement in Chemistry. SAGE Open, 5(1), 1-7.

Boardman, A. G., Moore, B. A., & Scornavacco, K. R. (2015). Disrupting the norm with collaborative strategic reading. English Journal, 105(1), 48-54.

Boadu, G. (2015). Effective teaching in history: The perspectives of history student teachers. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 3(1), 38-51.

Burns, A., & Joyce, de S. (2015). Teachers’ voices 8: Explicitly supporting reading and writing in the classroom. Sydney: Macquarie University.

Carr, J. (2013). 5 Active learning strategies for the science classroom. Retrieved from http://wiredcosmos.com/2013/02/01/5-active-learning-strategies-for-the-science-classroom

Carss, W. D. (2007). The effects of using Think-Pair-Share during guided reading lessons (Master’s thesis). The Undercity of Waikato, Hamilton, New Zealand. Retrieved from https://hdl.handle.net/10289/2233

Cherry, K. (2017). How social learning theory works: A closer look at how people learn through observation. Retrieved from https://www.verywellmind.com/sociallearning-theory-2795074

Cooper, K. M., Schinske, J. N., & Tanner, K. D. (2021). Reconsidering the share of a Think-Pair-Share: Emerging limitations, alternatives, and opportunities for research. CBE-Life Sciences Education, 20(1), 1-20.

Culatta, R. (2015). Social learning theory (Albert Bandura). Retrieved from http://www.instructionaldesign.org/theories/social-learning.html

David, L. (2014). Social development theory (Vygotsky) in learning theories. Retrieved from https://www.learning-theories.com/vygotskys-social-learning-learning-theory.html

Dolma, P. (2016). Investigating the alignment of Bhutanese mathematics teachers’ planned approaches within the context of a reformed curriculum. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 16(3), 581-602.

Gurbuz, N., Simsek, U., & Berber, K. (2015). Effects of cooperative learning model on the academic success of students at 6th grade social studies lesson. Caucasus University e- Caucasus Education Research Journal, 2(1), 19-27.

Hasmymati & Surwadi. (2018). Experimentation of cooperative learning model STAD-TGT type against students’ learning results. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1028, 012090.

Heale, R., & Twycross, A. (2015). Validity and reliability in quantitative studies. Evidence-Based Nursing, 18(3), 66-67.

Hudri, M. & Irwandi, I. (2019). Improving students’ reading skill through Think-Pair-Share (TPS) technique. Journal of English Language Teaching and Linguistics, 11(2), 1-7.

Hwang, S. H., & Ananthi, P. (2017). Making cooperative learning work for teaching and lerning. HSSE Online, 6(2), 102-111.

Jack, L. M. (2015). An analysis of the implementation and the effect of jigsaw and think-pair-share cooperative learning strategies on ninth grade students’ achievement in algebra I (Doctoral Dissertation). Pro Quest Dissertation and Theses database (UMI No. 3689597).

Johnson, D. W., & Johnson, R. T. (2018) Cooperative learning: The foundation for active learning. Retrieved from https://www.intechopen.com/books/active-learning-beyond-the-future/cooperative-learning-the-foundation-for-active-learning

Johnson, D. W, & Johnson, R. T. (2017) Cooperative learning. Retrieved from https://2017.congresoinnovacion.educa.aragon.es/documents/48/David_Johnson.pdf

Kagan, S. (1989) Cooperative learning resources for teachers. San Juan Capistrano, CA: Resources for Teachers.

Korkmaz, T. S., & Tay, B. (2016). The effect of cooperative learning method and systemic teaching on students’ achievement and retention of knowledge in social studies lesson. Eurasian Journal of Education Research, 66, 315-334.

Kurjum, M., Muhid, A., & Thohir, M. (2020). Think-Pair-Share model as solution to develop students’ critical thinking in Islamic studies: Is it effective? Cakrawala Pendidikan, 39(1), 144-154.

Lewis, B. (2019). What is cooperative learning - Teaching students to collaborate effectively? Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-cooperative-learning-2081641

Lightner, J., & Tomaswick. L. (2017). Active Learning - Think, Pair, Share. Retrieved from https://www.kent.edu/ctl/educational-resources/active-learning-think-pair-share/

Linsenmeyer, M. (2021). Brief activities: Questioning, brainstorming, Think-Pair-Share, jigsaw, and clinical case discussions. In Fornari, A. (Ed.). How-to Guide for Active Learning. IAMSE Manuals. Sringer, Cham.

Lyman, F. (1981). Influence of Think-Pair-Share on improving students’ Oral Communication Skills EFL classrooms. Retrieved from https://www.scirp.org/journal/paperinformation.aspx?paperid=73454

McLeod, S. (2018). The zone of proximal development and scaffolding. Retrieved from https://www.simplypsychology.org/Zone-of-Proximal-Development.html

Mello, D., & Less, C. A. (2013). Effectiveness of active learning in the arts and sciences. Retrieved from https://www.scholarsarchire.jwu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi? article=1044/context=humanities_fac

Momani, M., Asiri, M. A., & Alatawi, S. M. (2016). The Impact of implementing active learning strategies in teaching English from the perspective of Tabuk educational region intermediate school teachers. Asian Journal of Educational Research, 4(1), 19-35.

Namgyel, S. (2011). Quality of education in Bhutan: Historical and theoretical understanding matter. Thimphu: DSB Publication.

Neff, L. S. (n.d.). Learning theories website. Retrieved from https://jan.ucc.nau.edu/lsn/educator/edtech/learningtheorieswebsite/vygotsky.htm

Pardeshi, K. R. (2016). Improving the student performance using Think-Pair-Share for operating system. Journal of Engineering Education Transformations, SI, 1-8.

Piaget, J. (1980). The psychogenesis of knowledge and its epistemological significance. In Piatelli- Palmarini, M. (Ed.). Language and learning (pp. 23-34). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3), 223-231.

Raba, A. A. A. (2017). The influence of Think-Pair-Share (TPS) on improving students: Oral communication skills in EFL classrooms. Creative Education, 8(1), 12-23.

Rashmi (2020). Aims and objectives of teaching social studies. Retrieved from https://www.teachersadda.com/aims-and-objectives-of-teaching-social-studies/

Syaiful, R., & Khoerul, U. 2019. The effect of Problem-Posing and Think-Pair-Share learning models on students’ mathematical Problem-Solving skills and mathematical communication skills. Journal of Education, Teaching, and Learning, 4(2), 287-291.

Royal Education Council. (2018). Geography curriculum framework class PP - XII. Paro: Bhutan.

Sherab, K., & Dorji, P. (2013). Bhutanese teachers’ pedagogical orientation in the primary classes: A factor on quality education. Journal of the International Society for Teacher Education, 17(1), 18-28.

Sumekto, D. R. (2018). Investigating the influence of Think-Pair-Share approach toward students’ reading achievement. Lingua Cultura, 12(2), 195-202.

Syafii, M. L. (2018). Using the Think-Pair-Share strategy to increase students’ active involvement and to improve their speaking ability. Indonesian Journal of English Education, 5(1), 61-80.

Trivedi, K. S., Kim, D. S., & Ghosh, R. (2013). System availability assessment using stochastic models. Journal of International Society for Business and Industrial Statistics, 29(2), 94-109.

Ultanir, E. (2012). An epistemological glance at the constructivist approach: Constructivist learning in Dewey, Piaget, and Montessori. International Journal of Instruction, 5(2), 195-212.

Vanderbilt University. (2018). What is instructional scaffolding? The IRIS Centres. Retrieved from https://iris.peabody.vanderbilt.edu/module/sca/cresource/q1/p0/

Yusuf, A. R., Owede, V. C., & Bello, M. B. (2018). Effect of Think-Pair-Share instructional strategy on students’ achievement in civic education in Bayelsa, Nigeria. Anatolian Journal of Education, 3(2), 47-62.