Team Members’ Perspectives on Factors Affecting Virtual Team Working in Information Technology Consulting Firms
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to explore team members’ perspectives on factors affecting virtual team working in information technology consulting firms. Using semi-structured interviews with 25 research participants, this research adopted 2 virtual teams in different contexts. One that had no face-to-face interaction whereas and the other one had the initial face-to-face meeting. The results showed that communication, trust, socialization, cultural diversity and leadership were factors affecting virtual team working for both teams. Communication was the main challenge due to different time zones but both teams overcame by organizing overlapping hours to have online synchronous meetings. The initial face-to-face meeting and open lines of communication developed affect-based trust among team members whereas cognition-based trust based on consistent work performance existed in virtual teams that lacked physical interaction. Conducting virtual bonding exercises occasionally is necessary for virtual team members in order to renew interpersonal ties among team members. In terms of culture diversity, team members from individualistic cultures favored direct communication whereas team members from collectivistic cultures soured out group-based information before reaching unanimous decisions. In terms of leadership, managers of both virtual teams ensured that work progress was on schedule and maintaining positive leadership attitudes is the key to lead virtual teams.
Article Details
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
References
Bell, B. S., & Kozlowski, S. W. J. (2002). A typology of virtual teams: Implications for effective leadership. Group and Organization Management, 27(1), 14-49.
Bergiel, B. J., Bergiel, E. B., & Balsemeier, P. W. (2008). Nature of virtual teams: A summary of their advantages and disadvantages. Management Research News, 31(2), 99-110.
Bryman, A. (2008). Social research methods. UK: Oxford University Press.
Carmel, E. (1999). Global software teams: collaborating across borders and time zones. New Jersey, USA: Prentice-Hall.
Cascio, W. F. (2000). Managing a virtual workplace. Academy of Management Perspectives, 14(3), 81-90.
Cohen, J. (1989). Structuration theory: Anthony Giddens and the constitution of social life. London, UK: Macmillan Education.
Crisp, C. B., & Jarvenpaa, S. L. (2013). Swift trust in global virtual team: trusting beliefs and normative actions. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12(1), 45-56.
Dafoulas, G., & Macaulay, L. (2002). Investigating cultural differences in virtual software teams. Electronic Journal of Information Systems in Developing Countries, 7(1), 1-14.
Dirks, K. (1999). The effects of interpersonal trust on work group performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84(3), 445-455.
Dulebohn, J., & Hoch, J. (2017). Virtual teams in organizations. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 569-574.
Giddens, A. (1979). Central problems in social theory: action, structure and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley, USA: University of California Press.
Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
Gillham, B. (2000). Case study research methods. London, UK: Continuum.
Glazer, S., & Karpati, T. (2014). The role of culture in decision making. Cutter IT Journal, 27(9), 23-29.
Gupta, S., & Pathak, G.S. (2017). Understanding the dimensions of virtual teams: a study of professional students in India. International Journal of Web-Based Learning and Teaching Technologies, 12(2), 55-68.
Herbsleb, J. D., Mockus, A., Finholt, T. A., & Grinter, R. E. (2000). Distance, dependencies, and delay in a global collaboration. Retrieved from https://www.cc.gatech.edu/~beki/c12.pdf
Hertel, G., Geister, S., & Konradt, U. (2005). Managing virtual teams: A review of current empirical research. Human Resource Management Review, 15(1), 69-95.
Hill, M., & Fee, L. (1995). The politics of nation building and citizenship in Singapore. London, UK: Routledge.
Hoegl, M., & Proserpio, L. (2004). Team member proximity and teamwork in innovative projects. Research Policy, 33(8), 1153-1165.
Horwitz, F. M., Bravington, D., & Silvis, U. (2006). The promise of virtual teams: Identifying key factors in effectiveness and failure. Journal of European Industrial Training, 30(6), 472-494.
Huynh, T. N., & Hua, N. T. A. (2020). The relationship between task-oriented leadership style, psychological capital, jobs satisfaction and organizational commitment. Journal of Advances in Management Research, 17(4), 583-604.
Jarvenpaa, S. L., & Leidner, D. E. (1999). Communication and trust in global virtual teams. Organization Science, 10(6), 791-815.
Kirkman, B. L., Rosen, B., Gibson, C. B., Tesluk, P. E., & Mcpherson, S. O. (2002). Five challenges to virtual team success: Lessons from Sabre. Academy of Management Executive, 16(3), 67-79.
Kitirattarkarn, P., Araujo, T., & Neijens, P. (2020). Cultural differences in motivation for consumers’ online brand-related activities on Facebook. Communication, 45(1), 53-73.
Krishna, S., Sahay, S., & Walsham, G. (2004). Managing cross-cultural issues in global software outsourcing. Communications of the ACM, 47(4), 62-66.
Liao, C. (2017). Leadership in virtual teams: A multilevel perspective. Human Resource Management Review, 27(4), 648-659.
Lin, C., Standing, C., & Liu, Y. (2008). A model to develop effective teams. Decisions Support Systems, 45(4), 1031-1045.
Marchington, M., & Wilkinson, A. (2005). Direct participation and involvement (pp. 398-423). In Bach, S. (Ed.). Managing human resources: Personnel management in transition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
May, A., & Carter, C. (2001). A case study of virtual teams working in the European automotive industry. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 27(3), 171-186.
McAllister, D. J. (1995). Affect-and cognition-based trust formations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Academy of Management Journal, 38(1), 24-59.
Merkin, S., & Ramadan, R. (2016). Communication practices in the US and Syria. Springerplus, 5(1), 1-12.
Mikkelsen, M., Jacobsen, C. B., & Andersen, L. B. (2017). Managing employee motivation: Exploring the connections between managers’ enforcement actions, employee perceptions, and employee intrinsic motivation. International Public Management Journal, 20(2), 183-205.
Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J., & Willcocks, L. (2007). Global software development: Exploring socialization and face-to face meetings in distributed strategic projects. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 16(1), 25-49.
Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J., & Willcocks, L. (2008). Socialization in a global context: Lessons from dispersed teams (pp. 21-54). In Panteli, N., & Chiasson, M. (Eds.). Exploring virtually within and beyond organizations: Social, global and local dimensions. New York, USA: Macmillan.
Powell, A., Piccoli, G., & Ives, B. (2004). Virtual teams: A review of current literature and directions for future research. The Data Base for Advances in Information Systems, 35(1), 6-36.
Rice, D., Davidson, B., Dannenhoffer, J., & Gay, G. (2007). Improving the effectiveness of virtual teams by adapting team processes. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 16(6), 567-594.
Robert, L. (2013). Trust and control in virtual teams: Unraveling the impact of team awareness systems in virtual team. Retrieved from http://collab.di.uniba.it/trusttheorytools/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/2014/05/CSCW-2013-Robert-Position-Paper-Final-Submission-01-02-13-08-50-15.pdf
Robert, L. (2016). Monitoring and trust in virtual teams (pp. 363-374). In Proceedings of the 19th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. San Francisco, USA: Association for Computing Machinery.
Rosen, B., Furst-Holloway, S., & Blackburn, R. (2007). Overcoming barriers to knowledge sharing in virtual teams. Organizational Dynamics, 36(3), 259-273.
Rubin, H., & Rubin, I. (2005). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Samarah, I., Paul, S., & Tadisina, S. (2007). Collaboration technology support for knowledge conversion in virtual teams: A theoretical perspective (pp. 1-10). In Proceedings of the 40th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Hawaii, USA: IEEE Computer Society.
Shachaf, P. (2008). Cultural diversity and information and communication technology impacts on global virtual teams: An exploratory study. Information and Management, 45(2), 131-142.
Shachaf, P., & Hara, N. (2005). Team effectiveness in virtual environments: An ecological approach (pp. 209-224). In Ferris, P., & Godar, S. (Eds.). Teaching and learning with virtual teams. Pennsylvania, USA: Idea Group Publishing.
Shelton, S. (2019). How to maintain culture in virtual teams. Retrieved from https://executiveleader.com/how-to-maintain-culture-in-virtual-teams
Tongca, M. (2007). Purposive sampling as a tool for informant selection. Ethnobotany Research and Applications, 7, 147-158.
Turner, J. (1986). The theory of structuration. American Journal of Sociology, 91(4), 969-977.
Webber, S. (2008). Development of cognitive and affective trust in teams a longitudinal study. Small Group Research, 39(6), 746-769.
Whittington, R. (1992). Putting Giddens into action: Social systems and managerial agency. Journal of Management Studies, 29(6), 693-712.
Wong, D. (1997). Transience and settlement: Singapore’s foreign labor policy. Asian and Pacific Migration Journal, 6(2), 135-167.
Wong, S., & Burton, R.M. (2000). Virtual teams: What are their characteristics, and impact on team performance? Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 6(4), 339-360.
Yates, J., & Oliveira, S. (2016). Culture and decision making. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 136(C), 106-118.