Ethical Framework of Digital Technology, Artificial Intelligence, and Health Equity

Main Article Content

Piyanat Prathomwong
Pagorn Singsuriya

Abstract

Healthcare is evident in the extensive use of digital technology and artificial intelligence (AI). Although one aim of technological development and application is to promote health equity, it can at the same time increase health disparities. An ethical framework is needed to analyze issues arising in the effort to promote health equity through digital technology and AI. Based on an analysis of ethical principles for the promotion of health equity, this research article aims to synthesize an ethical framework for analyzing issues related to the promotion of health equity through digital technology and AI. Results of the study showed a synthesized framework that comprises two main groups of ethical principles: general principles and principles of management. The latter is meant to serve the implementation of the former. The general principles comprise four core principles: Human Dignity, Justice, Non-maleficence, and Beneficence, covering major principles and minor principles. For example, the core principle of Human Dignity includes three major principles (Non-humanization, Privacy, and Autonomy), and two minor principles (Explicability and Transparency). Other core principles have their relevant major and minor principles. The principles of management can be categorized according to their goals to serve different core principles. An illustration of applying the ethical framework is offered through the analysis and categorization of issues solicited from experts in multidisciplinary workshops on digital technology, AI, and health equity.

Article Details

How to Cite
Prathomwong, P., & Singsuriya, P. . (2022). Ethical Framework of Digital Technology, Artificial Intelligence, and Health Equity. Asia Social Issues, 15(5), 252136. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2022.252136
Section
Research Article

References

Bohr, A., Memarzadeh, K., & Cohen, G. (2020). Ethical and legal challenges of artificial intelligence-driven healthcare (pp. 295-336). In Bohr, A., & Memarzadeh, K. (Eds.). Artificial intelligence in healthcare. Elsevier: Academic Press.

Braveman, P., & Gruskin, S. (2003). Defining equity in health. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 57(4), 254-258.

Chauvin, J., Perera, Y., & Clarke, M. (2016). Digital technologies for population health and health equity gains: The perspective of public health associations. Journal of Public Health Policy, 37(Suppl 2), 232-248.

DeCamp, M., DeSalvo, K., & Dzeng, E. (2020). Ethics and spheres of influence in addressing social determinants of health. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 35(9), 2743-2745.

Fee, E., & Gonzalez, A. R. (2017). The history of health equity: Concept and vision. Diversity and Equality in Health and Care, 14(3), 148-52.

Floridi, L., & Cowls, J. (2019). A unified framework of five principles for AI in society. Harvard Data Science Review, 1.1, 1-17.

Fong, H., & Harris, E. (2015). Technology, innovation and health equity. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 93(7), 438-438A.

Gerke, S., Minssen, T., & Cohen, G. (2020). Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare, 295-336. Elsevier: Academic Press.

Hagerty, A., & Rubinov, I. (2019). Global AI ethics: A review of the social impacts and ethical implications of artificial intelligence. Retrieved from https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1907/1907.07892.pdf

Meskó, B., & Görög, M. (2020). A short guide for medical professionals in the era of artificial intelligence. npj Digital Medicine, 3(126), 1-8.

Moghaddasi, H., Amanzadeh, M., Rahimi, F., & Hamedan, M. (2017). eHealth equity: Current perspectives. Journal of the International Society for Telemedicine and eHealth, 5, e9.

Morley, J., Machado, C., Burr, C., Cowls, J., Joshi, I., Taddeo, M., & Floridi, L. (2020). The ethics of AI in health care: A mapping review. Social Science & Medicine, 260, 113172.

Office of the National Digital Economy and Society Commission. (n.d.). Thailand AI ethics guideline. Bangkok, Thailand: Ministry of Digital Economy and Society.

Royakkers, L., Timmer, J., Kool, L., & Est, R. V. (2018). Societal and ethical issues of digitization. Ethics and Information Technology, 20, 127-142.

Urs, G., Marcello, L., James, S., Joanna, S., & Effy, V. (2020). Digital tools against COVID-19: Taxonomy, ethical challenges, and navigation aid. The Lancet Digital Health, e425-34.