Ecological Footprint Affecting the Pro-environmental Behavior of Undergraduates of Rajabhat Mahasarakham University

Main Article Content

Sapphasit Kaewhao

Abstract

The research objectives were to study Ecological Footprint for Shelter, Ecological Footprint for Food, Ecological Footprint for Transportation, Ecological Footprint for Cloth, Ecological Footprint for Medicine, and Ecological Footprint for Housing and Pro-environmental Behavior levels and to study the independent variables comprise of Ecological Footprint for Shelter, Ecological Footprint for Food, Ecological Footprint for Transportation, Ecological Footprint for Cloth, Ecological Footprint for Medicine and   Ecological Footprint for Housing affecting dependent variable of Pro-environmental Behavior of undergraduates. This survey used a questionnaire to gather 400 undergraduates and 10,757 undergraduates of Rajabhat Mahasarakham University in the first semester of the academic year of 2021. The Multi-Stage sampling technique was employed to collect the sample. Multiple Regression Analysis was used to determine the relationship between independent and dependent variables.


            The results illustrated that in a holistic view of Ecological Footprint for Shelter, Ecological Footprint for Food, Ecological Footprint for Transportation, Ecological Footprint for Cloth, Ecological Footprint for Medicine, and Ecological Footprint for Housing and Pro-environmental Behavior were most levels. Moreover, independent variables of Ecological Footprint for Shelter, Ecological Footprint for Food, Ecological Footprint for Transportation, Ecological Footprint for Cloth, Ecological Footprint for Medicine, and Ecological Footprint for Housing can predict the variation of the dependent variable of Pro-environmental behavior with 65.90 percent of power prediction (Adjusted R2  = 0.659). Ecological Footprint for Food was the highest effect with 0.248.

Article Details

How to Cite
Kaewhao, S. . (2022). Ecological Footprint Affecting the Pro-environmental Behavior of Undergraduates of Rajabhat Mahasarakham University. Asia Social Issues, 15(6), 253995. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2022.253995
Section
Research Article

References

Chaysri, N., Thiengkamol. N., & Thiengkamol, C. (2016). Carbon footprint and environmental education affecting conservation behavior (pp. 126-132). In Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Science. Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Well-Being (STISWB VIII). Yangon, Myanmar.

Cronbach, J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334.

Department of Agriculture. (2019). Agricultural products. Retrieved from http://www.doa.go.th/en/?page_id=22

Department of Environmental Conservation. (2019). Ecological footprint for foods (NRD). Retrieved from https://www.dec.ny.gov/regulations/2411.html

Department of Mineral Resources. (2019). Annualreport2017.Retrieved from http://www.dmr.go.th/download/annual_report_%202560.pdf

Department of National Park, Wildlife and Plant Conservation. (2019). National park. Retrieved from http://www.dnp.go.th/index_eng.asp

Gautami, S. T. (2010). Ecological footprint and sustainable development. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/gautami_tondapu/1

Hair, J., Black, Jr, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th eds.). New Jersey: Prentice Hall.

Lim, A. (2018). What is ecological footprint? Definition and how to calculate it. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/what-is-ecological-footprint-4580244

McGinley, M. (2012). Exponential growth. Retrieved from http://www.eoearth.org/view/article/152715/

Monfreda, C., Wackernagel, M., & Deumling, D. (2004). Establishing national natural capital accounts based on detailed ecological footprint and biological capacity assessments. Land Use Policy, 21(3), 231-246.

Mukpradab, P., Thiengkamol, N., & Khoowaranyoo Thiengkamol, T. (2016). Model of factors affecting environmental conservation behavior of high school students. Kasem Bundit Journal, 17(1), 44-55.

Mukpradab, P., Thiengkamol, N., & Thiengkamol, K. T. (2015). Model of ecological footprint and environmental education. In Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Science, Technology and Innovation for Sustainable Well-Being (STISWB VII). Nakhon Pathom-Phetchaburi, Thailand: Sipakorn University.

Nicely, R. (2018). Thailand poultry and products annual. Retrieved from https://gain.fas.usda.gov/Recent%20GAIN%20Publications/Poultry%20and%20Products%20Annual_Bangkok_Thailand_9-6-2018.pdf

Richardson, B. J., & Wood, S. (2006). Environmental law for sustainability. Oxford, England: Hart Publishing.

Rovinelli, J., & Hambleton, K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Dutch Journal of Educational Research, 2, 49-60.

Rovinelli, R. J., & Hambleton, R. K. (1977). On the use of content specialists in the assessment of criterion-referenced test item validity. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fultlext/ED121845.pdf.

Royal Forestry Department. (2019). Natural resources. Retrieved from https://www.bangkokpost.com/business/companies%20in%20thailand/13130/royal-forest-department

Sangkaew, M. Thiengkamol, N., & Thiengkamol C. (2016). Model of factors affecting environmental conservation behavior of junior high school student. Kasem Bundit Journal, 17(2), 142-152.

Schonlau, M., Fricker, R., & Elliott, M. (2002). Background on volume 9, the survey via email and web. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.

Sua´rez Guerrero, A. I., & Sua´rez Guerrero, M. G. (1998). Analysis: National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 29, 375-390.

Thiengkamol, N. (2011e). Environment and development book. (4th eds.). Bangkok, Thailand: Chulalongkorn University Press.

Thiengkamol, N. (2016). Theory development with LISREL research. Bangkok, Thailand: CU Printing.

United Nations. (2019). Ecological footprint for transportation putting millions of lives at risk. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/news/un-ecological-damage-putting-millions-of-lives-at-risk.

Wackernagel, M., & Rees, W. E. (1996). Our ecological footprint: Reducing human impact on the earth. Gabriola Island, British Columbia, Canada: New Society Publisher.

Wackernagel, M., Monfreda, C., Moran, D., Wermer, P., Goldfinger, S., Deumling, D., & Murray, M. (2005). National footprint and biocapacity accounts 2005: The underlying calculation method. Oakland, USA: Global Footprint Network.

Wackernagel, M., Onisto, L., Bello, P., Linares, A. C., Lo´pez Falfa’n, I. S., Me´ndez Garcı´a, (1999). National natural capital accounting with the ecological footprint concept. Ecological Economics, 29(1999), 375-390.

Wackernagel, M., Schulz, N. B., Deumling, D., Linares, A. C., Jenkins, M., Kapos, V., Monfreda, C., Loh, J., & Myers, N. (2002). Tracking the ecological overshoot of the human economy (pp.9266-9271). In Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 99. USA: PNAS.

Wikipedia. (2018). Overpopulation. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Overpopulation