Causal Relationships Model for Total Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, and Organizational Performance: the Automotive and Automotive Parts Industries in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC), Thailand

Main Article Content

Sangduen Pattanasiri
Thitima Chaiyakul

Abstract

Fluctuations in the global economy in the early 21st century due to financial collapses and unexpected circumstances surrounding the COVID-19 pandemic have greatly affected the competitiveness and viability of many industries around the world including Automotive and Automotive Parts in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC), Thailand. Effective management strategies including total quality management (TQM) and supply chain management (SCM) will guide the better performance of businesses. Additionally, the previous published studies in Automotive and Automotive Parts industries in these issues are limited. Hence, the objective of this study is to investigate the causal relationships model which focuses on total quality management (TQM), supply chain management (SCM) and organizational performance (OP) of the Automotive and Automotive Parts Industries in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). Data were collected from 212 companies operating in the Automotive and Automotive Parts Industries in Thailand’s Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC). The data comprised answers from a self-administered survey, and these were analyzed using descriptive statistics and the structural equations modeling (SEM) method. The findings suggest that together, TQM and SCM generate positive outcomes for organizational performance. Furthermore, supply chain management mediates the relationship between TQM and organizational performance. Hence, effective total quality management and supply chain management can be integrated into businesses’ management and operational strategies to improve the financial and non-financial aspects of their performance.

Article Details

How to Cite
Pattanasiri , S. ., & Chaiyakul, T. (2022). Causal Relationships Model for Total Quality Management, Supply Chain Management, and Organizational Performance: the Automotive and Automotive Parts Industries in the Eastern Economic Corridor (EEC), Thailand. Asia Social Issues, 16(1), e254783. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2023.254783
Section
Research Article

References

Akbulaev, N., Mammadov, I., & Aliyev V. (2020). Economic impact of COVID-19. Sylwan, 164(5), 113-126.

Chen, I. J., & Paulraj, A. (2004). Towards a theory of supply chain management: the constructs and measurements. Journal of Operations Management, 22(2), 119-150.

Chia, A., Goh, M., & Hum, S. H. (2009). Performance measurement in supply chain entities: balanced scorecard perspective. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 16(5), 605-620.

Comrey, A. L., & Lee, H. B., (1992), A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale, New Jersey: Erlbaum.

Fairchild, A. J., & MacKinnon, D. P. (2009). A general model for testing mediation and moderation effects. Prevention Science : the official journal of the Society for Prevention Research, 10(2), 87-99.

Habidin, N., Ithnin, M., Md Latip, N. A., M.N.A, A., & Fuzi, N. (2016). The development of strategic balanced scorecard tool (SBST) for Malaysian automotive industry. Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering, 33,1-15.

Hoe, S. L. (2008). Issues and procedures in adopting structural equation modeling technique. Journal of Applied Quantitative Methods, 3, 76-83.

Hoyle, R. H. (1995). The structural equation modeling approach: Basic concepts and fundamental issues (pp. 1-15). In Hoyle, R. H. (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. California, USA: Sage Publications,

Joiner, T. A. (2007). Total quality management and performance: The role of organization support and co‐worker support. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 24(6), 617-627.

Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C. (2005). Just in time, total quality management, and supply chain management: understanding their linkages and impact on business performance. Omega, 33(2), 153-162.

Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (2nd eds). Newyork, USA: Guilford Press.

Kumar, V., & Sharma, R. R. K. (2017). An empirical investigation of critical success factors influencing the successful TQM implementation for firms with different strategic orientation. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 34(9),1530-1550.

Latifah, S. N., Wijayanti, W., & Utami, E.M. (2021) The effect of the application of total quality management, supply chain management, and entrepreneurship orientation on operational performance. Journal of Digital Marketing and Halal Industry, 3(1), 63-71.

Modgil, S., & Sharma, S. (2017). Linkage between total quality and supply chain management practices and operational performance: a review. International Journal of Services and Operations Management, 27(1), 35-59.

Munizu, M. (2013). The impact of total quality management practices towards competitive advantage and organizational performance: Case of fishery industry in South Sulawesi Province of Indonesia. Pakistan Journal of Commerce and Social Sciences, 7(1), 184-197.

Nugroho, A., Christiananta, B., Wulani, F., & Pratama I. (2020). Exploring the association among just in time, total quality and supply chain management influence on firm ferformance: evidence from Indonesia. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 9(2), 920-928.

Prajogo, D. I., & Sohal, A. S. (2006). The integration of TQM and technology/R&D management in determining quality and innovation performance. Omega, 34(3), 296-312.

Prashanth, K. C. (2017). TQM influence on quality performance at working iron and steel firms of Karnataka. CLEAR International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 8(10), 52-57.

Rigby, D., & Bilodeau, B. (2018). Management Tools & Trends. Boston, USA: Bain and Company.

Saad, M., and Patel, B. (2006). An investigation of supply chain performance measurement in the Indian automotive sector. Benchmarking: An International Journal, 13(1/2), 36-53.

Salaheldin, S. I. (2009). Critical success factors for TQM implementation and their impact on performance of SMEs. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 58(3), 215-237.

Saragih J., Tarigan A., Pratama I., Wardati J., & Silalahi E. F. (2020). The impact of total quality mangement, supply chian management practices and operations capability on firm performance. Polish Journal of Management Studies. 21(2), 384-397

Shafiq, M., Lasrado, F., & Hafeez, K. (2019). The effect of TQM on organisational performance: empirical evidence from the textile sector of a developing country using SEM. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 30(1-2), 31-52.

Sila, I., Ebrahimpour, M., & Birkholz, C. (2006). Quality in supply chains: an empirical analysis. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, 11(6), 491-502.

Tenner, A. R., & DeToro, I. J. (1992). Total Quality Management: Three Steps to Continuous Improvement. Addison Wesley Publishing Company, USA.

Thailand Automotive Institute. (2020). Summary of Thai automotive industry in 2020 and tendency in 2021. Retrieved from http://www.thaiauto.or.th/2020/news/news-detail.asp?news_id=4967

Thiagaragan, T., Zairi, M., & Dale, B. G. (2001). A proposed model of TQM implementation based on an empirical study of Malaysian industry. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, 18(3), 289-306.

Vanichchinchai, A., & Igel, B. (2011). The impact of total quality management on supply chain management and firm's supply performance. International Journal of Production Research, 49(11), 3405-3424.

Venkatraman, N., & Ramanujam, V. (1986). Measurement of Business Performance in Strategy Research: A Comparison of Approaches. Academy of Management Review 11 (4):801-814.

Weerapong, P., Manisri, T., & Sivabrovornvatana, N. (2017). Modeling of supply chain continuity management effect to business performance of automobile industries in Thailand. Veridian E-Journal Silpakorn University 10 (3):752-768.

Zehir, C., Ertosun, Ö. G., Zehir, S., & Müceldilli, B. (2012). Total Quality Management Practices’ Effects on Quality Performance and Innovative Performance. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 41, 273-280.