Beyond Non-Interference: The Improved ASEAN Humanitarian-assistance Mechanism to Respond to the Myanmar Crisis
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Since the occurrence of the Myanmar military coup in February 2021, the non-interference principle of the ASEAN Way shows the institutional limitations in dealing with the Myanmar crisis effectively. Simultaneously, some ASEAN scholars suggest that ASEAN may need to improve the regional human-rights mechanism to resolve the crisis by practicing Responsibility to Protect (R2P). Nevertheless, the Myanmar crisis is being trapped in an anarchic political environment, different attitudes of ASEAN and Myanmar toward the crisis not only expanded the conflicts between non-interference and R2P, and resulted in the lack of a synergistic mechanism to cope with this crisis. To solve practical problems, meet the needs of the Myanmar people for humanitarian assistance and alleviate the ripple effects originating from the Myanmar crisis in neighboring countries, this article adopts constructivism of international relations (IR) and the theory of functional synergism to analyze the different attitudes to non-interference and R2P among the region, as well as proposes a strategy of constructing a new synergistic humanitarian-assistance mechanism that beyond the limitations of non-interference to dealing with the Myanmar crisis.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
References
Acharya, A. (2004). How ideas spread: Whose norms matter? norm localization and institutional change in asian regionalism. International Organization, 58(2), 239-275.
Alexandra, L. (2012). Indonesia and the responsibility to protect. The Pacific Review, 25(1), 51-74.
Aminuddin, M., & Purnomo, J. (2017). Redefining ASEAN way: Assesing normative foundation on inter-governmental relationship in Southeast Asia. Journal of ASEAN Studies, 5(1), 23.
An, Z. (2021). The points of ASEAN summit in the three days (In Chinese). Retrieved from https://www.shobserver.com/news/detail?id=417941
Asian Development Bank. (n.d.). Poverty Data: Myanmar. Asian Development Bank. Retrieved from https://www.adb.org/countries/myanmar/poverty#:~:text=In%20Myanmar%2C%2024.8%25 %20of%20the,day%20in%202019%20is%201.1%25
Asia-Pacific Centre for Responsibility to Project. (2009). The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia. Brisbane, Australia: Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect
Bellamy, A., & Drummond, C. (2011). The responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia: Between non-interference and sovereignty as responsibility. The Pacific Review, 24(2), 179-200.
Bensaoud, M. (2015). Between R2P and the ASEAN way: The case of Myanmar’s cyclone nargis. Gadong, Negara Brunei Darussalam: Universiti Brunei Darussalam.
Borchers, H. (2014). ASEAN’s environmental challenges and non-traditional security cooperation: Towards a regional peacekeeping force? Austrian Journal of South-East Asian Studies, 7(1), 5-20.
China Global Television Network (CGTN). (2021). Myanmar crisis: A timeline. Retrieved from https://news.cgtn.com/news/2021-02-01/Myanmar-crisis-A-timeline-Xwsv258Z32/index.html
Chong, V., & Thongyoojaroen, T. (2021). Beyond the coup in Myanmar: The ASEAN Way Must Change. Retrieved from https://www.justsecurity.org/76126/beyond-the-coup-in-myanmar-the-asean-way-must-change/
Corthay, E. (2015). The ASEAN doctrine of non-interference in light of the fundamental principle of non-intervention. Asian-Pacific Law & Policy Journal, 17(2) 17-1.
Creac’h, Y.-K., & Fan, L. (2009). Myanmar: ASEAN’s role in the Cyclone Nargis response: implications, lessons and opportunities. Retrieved from https://reliefweb.int/report/myanmar/myanmar-aseans-role-cyclone-nargis-response-implications-lessons-and-opportunities
Davies, M. (2017). Important but de-centred: ASEAN’s role in the Southeast Asian human rights space. Trans: Trans -Regional And -National Studies Of Southeast Asia, 5(1), 99-119.
Drummond, C. (2011). The ASEAN Intergovernmental Commission on Human Rights (AICHR) and the Responsibility to Protect (R2P): Opportunities and constraints. Lucia, Australia: Asia-Pacific Centre for the Responsibility to Protect.
Emmerson, D. (2008). Hard choices. Security, democracy, and regionalism in Southeast Asia. Singapore: ISEAS Publications.
Haacke, J. (2009). Myanmar, the responsibility to protect, and the need for practical assistance. Global Responsibility to Protect, 1(2), 156-184.
Irishexaminer. (2021). Timeline: Key events in history of Myanmar. Retrieved from https://www.irishexaminer.com/world/arid-40217993.html
Jakartaglobe. (2018). Surin Pitsuwan’s passion for asean serves as inspiration for bloc’s future. Retrieved from https://jakartaglobe.id/news/surin-pitsuwans-passion-for-asean-serves-as-inspiration-for-blocs-future/
Jones, L. (2010). ASEAN’s unchanged melody? The theory and practice of ‘non-interference’ in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 23(4), 479-502.
Junk, J. (2015). Testing boundaries: Cyclone nargis in Myanmar and the scope of R2P. Global Society, 30(1), 78-93.
Kraft, H. (2012). RtoP by increments: the AICHR and localizing the responsibility to protect in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 25(1), 27-49.
Kraisoraphong, K. (2012). Thailand and the responsibility to protect. The Pacific Review, 25(1), 1-25.
Lee, H. (2018). ASEAN’s limited role in solving the Rohingya crisis. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2018/10/aseans-limited-role-in-solving-the-rohingya-crisis/
Moran, M. (2008). “Two tragedies, two responses: Inhumane reaction by regime in Myanmar”. Retrieved from http://www.cfr.org/burmamyanmar/two-tragedies-two-responses-inhumane-reaction-regime-myanmar/p16340>
Mounnarath, S. (2021). China and ASEAN: Community with a shared future (1st ed.). Beijing, China: NEW STAR PRESS.
Ng, E., & Gomez, J. (2021). Myanmar skips ASEAN summit after its military ruler excluded. Retrieved from https://www.usnews.com/news/world/articles/2021-10-25/myanmar-skips-asean-summit-to-protest-generals-exclusion
Ramcharan, R. (2000). ASEAN and non‑interference: A principle maintained. Contemporary Southeast Asia, 22(1), 60-88.
Reuters. (2021). ASEAN should rethink non-interference policy amid Myanmar crisis, Malaysia FM says. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/asean-should-rethink-non-interference-policy-amid-myanmar-crisis-malaysia-fm-2021-10-21/
Rieff, D. (2011). R2P, R.I.P. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2011/11/08/opinion/r2p-rip.html
Rüland, J. (2011). Southeast Asian regionalism and global governance: “Multilateral utility” or “Hedging utility”? Contemporary Southeast Asia, 33(1), 83-112.
Severino, R. (2006). Southeast Asia in search of an ASEAN community. Singapore: ISEAS-Yusof Ishak Institute.
Shang, P. (2021). Myanmar’s foreign policy: Shifting legitimacy, shifting strategic culture. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 41(1), 88-105.
Smith, C. Q., & Williams, S. G. (2021). Why Indonesia adopted ‘Quiet Diplomacy’ over R2P in the Rohingya crisis: The Roles of Islamic humanitarianism, Civil–Military Relations, and asean, Global Responsibility to Protect, 13(2-3), 158-185.
Sukma, R. (2012). The ASEAN political and security community (APSC): opportunities and constraints for the R2P in Southeast Asia. The Pacific Review, 25(1), 135-152.
Sullivan, D. (2021). ASEAN has failed on Myanmar. What’s next? Retrieved from https://www.justsecurity.org/78772/asean-has-failed-on-myanmar-whats-next/
Tan, S. (2011). Is Asia-Pacific regionalism outgrowing Asean? RUSI Journal, 156(1), 58-62.
Tekunan, S. (2014). The Asean way: The way to regional peace? Jurnal Hubungan Internasional, 3(2), 142-147.
The ASEAN Charter. (2007). The ASEAN secretariat. Retrieved from https://asean.org/wp-content/uploads/images/archive/publications/ASEAN-Charter.pdf
The ASEAN Secretariat. (2015). ASEAN 2025: Forging ahead together. Jakarta, Indonesia: The ASEAN Secretariat.
The ASEAN Secretariat. (2016). ASEAN political-security community blueprint 2025. Jakarta, Indonesia.
The ASEAN Secretariat. (2021). Chairman’s Statement on the ASEAN Leaders’ Meeting. Jakarta, Indonesia: The ASEAN Secretariat.
The Irrawaddy. (1998). Asean needs “Flexible engagement”. Retrieved from https://www2.irrawaddy.com/article.php?art_id=1166
The Irrawaddy. (2021). ASEAN dusts off non-interference policy as generals grab power in Myanmar. Retrieved from https://www.irrawaddy.com/news/burma/asean-dusts-off-non-interference-policy-generals-grab-power-myanmar.html
United Nations Development Programme. (2020). Human Development Report 2020. The Next Frontier: Human Development and the Anthropocene. Myanmar. The United Nations Development Programme. Retrieved from https://hdr.undp.org/sites/default/files/Country-Profiles/MMR.pdf
United Nations Environment Programme. (2009). Learning from Cyclone Nargis. Investing in the environment for livelihoods and disaster risk reduction A Case Study. The United Nations Environment Programme. Retrieved from https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/14116/myanmar_cyclonenargis_case_study.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=
United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. (2022). Myanmar situation. 2022 Situation overview. The United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. Retrieved from https://reporting.unhcr.org/myanmarsituation
United Nations News. (2009). Ban calls for three-pronged strategy to implement ‘responsibility to protect’. The United Nations. Retrieved from https://news.un.org/en/story/2009/01/289502-ban-calls-three-pronged-strategy-implement-responsibility-protect
United Nations News. (2021). Myanmar approaching point of economic collapse: UN report. The United Nations. Retrieved from https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/04/1091002
United Nations News. (2021).Human rights ‘catastrophe’ in Myanmar: UN calls for urgent action. The United Nations. Retrieved from https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/09/1100922
United Nations News. (2021).Myanmar: COVID-19 third wave has hit like a ‘tsunami’, warns WFP. The United Nations. Retrieved from https://news.un.org/en/story/2021/08/1097252
United Nations. (2005). United Nations Office on Genocide Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect. The United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/about-responsibility-to-protect.shtml
United Nations. (2009). General debate of the 64th session of the UN General Assembly, 23-26 and 28-29 September 2009. The United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/ar/ga/64/generaldebate/
United Nations. (n.d). Responsibility To Protect. The United Nations. Retrieved from https://www.un.org/en/genocideprevention/about-responsibility-to-protect.shtml#:~:text=2005%20World%20Summit%20Outcome%20Document,-Paragraphs%20on%20the&text=138
Wang, Z. (2021). Myanmar, China and ASEAN (In Chinese). The 12th Southwest Forum. Kunming, China: Yunnan University.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics (Cambridge Studies in International Relations). Cambridge, British: Cambridge University Press.
Wongcha-um., & Johnson. (2021). Analysis: On Myanmar, ASEAN pushes boundaries of “non-interference”. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/world/asia-pacific/myanmar-asean-pushes-boundaries-non-interference-2021-04-26/
Xinhua News. (2021). Interview: Solution to Myanmar issue can be worked out in “ASEAN way”, says military spokesman. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2021-05/01/c_139919795_2.htm
Yaolong, X., & Praveen, K. (2021). The people’s call for R2P: to be or not to be? Retrieved from https://www.newmandala.org/the-peoples-call-for-r2p-to-be-or-not-to-be/