The Learning Achievement of Airline Business Students on the Virtual Experience during the Pre-flight Emergency Equipment Check Procedures on the Airbus A320 Series Aircraft

Main Article Content

Vongsa Laovoravit
Wattana Manon
Wilawan Inchamnan
Pawin Swangarom

Abstract

The emergence of disruptive technology in mid-1999 caused the industrial revolution, which leverages the benefits of the industry’s products and elaborates new ideas for service sectors to a new level. The recent virtual technology brings opportunities to higher education along with these digital adaptations. However, there is a need for experimental research exploring the educational influence of using immersive virtual reality in aviation safety subjects. This quasi-experimental aimed to 1) address the Airline Business students’ learning achievement after using virtual reality technology due to retaining knowledge influenced by virtual experience. 2) study the capability of immersive technology based on the Airbus A320 series aircraft’s virtual environment that establishes the Airline Business students’ learning development in three areas: cognitive domain, psychomotor domain, and affective domain. Two groups of 30 participants were recruited based on a simple random sampling from a total number of 75 third-year Airline Business students in the experimental and control groups. The parametric statistics were conducted on a hypothesis testing by comparing two measurements from the experimental and control groups. The results revealed that the test scores of the experimental group obtained significantly better academic achievement in terms of the knowledge needed to perform tasks than the control group. Besides, the behavioral learning and emotional intelligence required to complete performance-related tasks were noticed in the experimental group. In addition, the effectiveness index (EI) was computed to affirm that the innovative learning tool can be an integral part of the future physical classroom. It indicated that students effectively learn in the aviation safety context via practicing through virtual reality. The virtual experience positively helps motivate and engage students in an aviation safety study. It also profoundly enhances the Airline Business students’ competency, including knowledge, skills, and attitudes needed to perform their future responsibilities as flight attendants.

Article Details

How to Cite
Laovoravit, V., Manon, W., Inchamnan, W. ., & Swangarom, P. . (2023). The Learning Achievement of Airline Business Students on the Virtual Experience during the Pre-flight Emergency Equipment Check Procedures on the Airbus A320 Series Aircraft . Asia Social Issues, 16(4), e255791. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2023.255791
Section
Research Article

References

Abele, A. E., & Spurk, D. (2009). The longitudinal impact of self-efficacy and career goals on objective and subjective career success. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 74(1), 53–62.

Abo El-Nasr, A.-B. (2017). Role of Engineering Design in Enhancing ABET Outcomes of Engineering Programs at Taif University. International Journal of Applied Science and Technology, 6, 9-15.

Al-Amri, A. Y., Osman, M., & Al-Musawi, A. S. (2020). The effectiveness of a 3D-virtual reality learning environment (3D-VRLE) on the omani eighth grade students’ achievement and motivation towards physics learning. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(5), 4-16.

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.

Annex 6. (2018). Operation of Aircraft Part I, Eleventh Edition. Retrieved from https://ffac.ch/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/ICAO-Annex-6-Operation-of-Aircraft-Part-I-International-commercial-air-transport.pdf.

Bandura, A. (1999). A social cognitive theory of personality (pp. 154-196). In Pervin, L., & John, O. (Eds.). Handbook of personality (2nd eds.). New York: Guilford Publications.

Barrios, T. (2021). Teaching competencies for the 21st century. Academia Letters, 3183.

Bein, O., Reggev, N., & Maril, A. (2014). Prior knowledge influences on hippocampus and medial prefrontal cortex interactions in subsequent memory. Neuropsychologia, 64, 320-330.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. A. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals. Handbook 1: Cognitive Domain. New York: David McKay.

Bogan, M., Bybee, S., & Bahlis, J. (2019). Increasing XR Technology’s Return on Investment through Media Analysis (pp. 1-14). In Proceedings of the Interservice/Industry Training, Simulation, and Education Conference (I/ITSEC) 2019. Florida, USA: The Interservice/Industry Training.

Bot, L., Gossiaux, P.-B., Rauch, C.-P., & Tabiou, S. (2005). ‘Learning by doing’: A teaching method for active learning in scientific graduate education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 30(1), 105-119.

Calogiuri, G., Litleskare, S., Fagerheim, K., Rydgren, T., Brambilla, E., & Thurston, M. (2018). Experiencing Nature through Immersive Virtual Environments: Environmental Perceptions, Physical Engagement, and Affective Responses during a Simulated Nature Walk. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 2321.

Cheng, K.-H., & Tsai, C.-C. (2020). Students’ motivational beliefs and strategies, perceived immersion and attitudes towards science learning with immersive virtual reality: A partial least squares analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 51, 2956.

Technology integration in schools. (2014). handbook of research on educational communications and technology, fourth edition. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2719053

Dewey, J. (1986). Experience and Education. The Educational Forum, 50(3), 241-252.

Dollard, J., & Miller, N. E. (1950). Personality and psychotherapy: An analysis in terms of learning, thinking, and culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Glaser, R. (1962). Training research and education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 4(2), 124-124.

Glaser, R. (1962). Programed instruction—A behavioral view. American Behavioral Scientist, 6(3), 46-51.

Goodman, R. I., Fletcher, K. A., & Schneider, E. W. (1980). The effectiveness index as a comparative measure in media product evaluations. Educational Technology, 20(9), 30-34.

Ji, M., Liu, B., Li, H., Yang, S., & Li, Y. (2019). The effects of safety attitude and safety climate on flight attendants’ proactive personality with regard to safety behaviors. Journal of Air Transport Management, 78, 80-86.

Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals, Handbook II: Affective domain. New York: David Mckay Company.

Lalley, J. P., & Miller, R. H. (2007). The learning pyramid: Does it point teachers in the right direction? Education, 3-13(128), 64-79.

Li, K., Hall, M., Bermell-Garcia, P., Alcock, J., Tiwari, A., & González-Franco, M. (2017). Measuring the learning effectiveness of serious gaming for training of complex manufacturing tasks. Simulation & Gaming, 48(6), 770-790.

Makransky, G., Petersen, G. B., & Klingenberg, S. (2020). Can an immersive virtual reality simulation increase students’ interest and career aspirations in science? British Journal of Educational Technology, 51(6), 2079-2097.

Miettinen, R. (2000). The concept of experiential learning and John Dewey’s theory of reflective thought and action. International Journal of Lifelong Education, 19(1), 54-72.

Mills, K., Jass Ketelhut, D., & Gong, X. (2019). Change of Teacher Beliefs, But Not Practices, Following Integration of Immersive Virtual Environment in the Classroom. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 57(7), 1786-1811.

Ngiik Hoon, L., & Shaharuddin, S. (2019). Learning Effectiveness of 3D Hologram Animation on Primary School Learners. Journal of Visual Art and Design, 11, 93-104.

Parong, J., & Mayer, R. E. (2018). Learning science in immersive virtual reality. Journal of Educational Psychology, 110(6), 785-797.

Prinz, N., Schleyer, C., & Kurth, M. (2018). Analysis and Verification of the Effectiveness and Efficiency of Virtual Reality Training (pp. 1-6). In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC). Stuttgart, Germany: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers.

Raven, J., & Stephenson, J. (2021). Competence in the Learning Society. NewYork: Peter Lang Verlag.

Shi, A., Wang, Y., & Ding, N. (2022). The effect of game–based immersive virtual reality learning environment on learning outcomes: Designing an intrinsic integrated educational game for pre–class learning. Interactive Learning Environments, 30(4), 721-734.

Simpson, E. J. (1972). The classification of educational objectives in the psychomotor domain. Washington DC: Gryphon House.

Stern, E. (2015). Intelligence, prior knowledge, and learning (pp. 323-328). In Wright, J. (Ed.). International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (2nd eds.). Waltham, MA: Elsevier.

Yelgin, Ç., & Ergün, N. (2021). Job demands perceived by cabin crew in airline companies: A case in Turkey. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science, 22(2), 200-218.