Social Cohesion in Southern Border Provinces of Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study of social cohesion in the southern border provinces of Thailand aimed to measure overall social cohesion of the three southern border provinces of Thailand and test some of the factors that are likely to be associated with social cohesion. The questionnaire, which was initially developed by the European Foundation on Social Quality, and later adjusted by the Asian Consortium of Social Quality was employed to obtain the data from the samples, which were the eligible voters or those 18 years of age and above in the southern border provinces of Thailand. The procedure used was multi-stage sampling with a total number of 978.
The survey data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, including frequency and percentage, inferential statistics, the Chi-square test to prove the relationship between independent and dependent variables. From the research, we found that most people had a low level of trust, and said they needed to be very careful in dealing with people. Most of the samples said they are proud to be Thai. In addition, the aptitude towards the tension between groups in the southern border provinces, the respondents think there is tension between every groups. The research indicated that several factors significantly related to trust, including age, religion, education, the sufficiency of income, discrimination experience because of nationality, discrimination experienced because of religion, confidence in achieving higher social or economic status by themselves, and expectation of help from the government or non-government organizations. In addition, the research also found that age, religion, employment status, discrimination experienced because of religion, confidence in achieving higher social or economic status by themselves, and expectation of help from the government or non-government organizations were significantly related to the feeling of being proud to be Thai.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
References
Beck, W., van der Maesen, L., & Walker, A. (1997). The social quality of Europe. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Beck, W., van der Maesen, L., Thomese, F., & Walker, A. (2001). Social quality: A vision for Europe. The Hague, Netherlands: Kluwer Law International.
Bureekul, T. (2008). Social cohesion in Thailand. Bangkok, Thailand: King Prajadhipok’s Institute.
Chan, R. K.H. (2007). Social quality in Hong Kong; whose agendas? which priorities?. NTU Social Work Review, 15, 39-87.
Daengsuwan, K. (2010). Social harmony promotion: Role of professional nurse in the Deep South Border Provinces. Princess of Naradhivas University Journal, 2(1), 14-23.
Deep South Watch. (2022). Summary of incidents in Southern Thailand. Retrieved from https://deepsouthwatch.org/th
Gordon, D. (2005). Editorial: Indicators of social quality. European Journal of Social Quality, 5(1-2), 1-7.
McCracken, M. (1998). Social cohesion and macroeconomic performance. (pp. 30-31). In Proceedings of the Conference on the State of Living Standards and the Quality of Life in Canada. Ottawa, Ontario/Canada: Château Laurier Hotel.
Phillips, D., & Berman, Y. (2008). Social cohesion and sustainable welfare society. NTU Social Work Review, 16, 1-44.
Ritzen, J., Easterly, W., & Woolcock, M. (2000). On “good” politicians and “bad” policies: Social cohesion, institutions, and growth. Policy Research Working Paper Series, No.2448, the World Bank.
van der Maesen, L. (2006). Sustainable welfare societies, the social quality approach as conceptual frame of reference and the case of the city of the Hague. The Hague, Netherlands: European Foundation on Social Quality.
van der Maesen, L., Walker, A., & Keiger, M. (2005). European network indicators of social quality. The Hague, Netherlands: European Foundation on Social Quality.
Walker, A., (1998). The Amsterdam Declaration on the social quality of Europe. European Journal of Social Work, 1(1), 109-111.
Wang, Lih-Rong, (2009). Social quality indicator in Asia: What is unique? Development and Society, 38(2), 297-337.