A Case Study from the Perspective of Rural Areas in Bangladesh Concerning “Additional Financial Aid” and “Support for Students”

Main Article Content

Md Mirajur Rhaman Shaoan
Patricia Mannix McNamara
Niamh Lafferty

Abstract

This study focused on educational solutions for children with special needs that are more effective in enhancing their academic performance than their social integration. The paper gives a case study of extra support provided by mobile special and rehabilitative educators to students deemed by their schools to need further assistance in reaching their goals but who are not recognized as having special needs in Bangladesh. A qualitative case study featured nine students and nine mobile CFP students who participated in the school throughout the 2017-18 school year survey. In this study, the author was interested in understanding the notion of inclusion and whether or not student assistance was currently in place would not only target additional professionals to assist the student, In the event of learning difficulties or special needs but also take into account the individual’s original environment (assistance to the child’s parents or guardians) and overall social inclusion. The present study evaluated the help and support given to students whose program orientation for students with special needs has not yet been determined but whom, according to practitioners, would benefit from additional support and incentives to increase their participation in the educational process. However, the paper discovered a fragmented view of inclusion and an emphasis on student participation. Despite positive results, developing less exclusive behaviors remains an Idabel obstacle.

Article Details

How to Cite
Shaoan, M. M. R., McNamara, P. M. ., & Lafferty, N. . (2023). A Case Study from the Perspective of Rural Areas in Bangladesh Concerning “Additional Financial Aid” and “Support for Students”. Asia Social Issues, 16(6), e263004. https://doi.org/10.48048/asi.2023.263004
Section
Research Article

References

Act on Guidance of Children with Special Needs /ZUOPP-1A/ (2011). Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia.

Act on integrated early treatment of preschool children with special needs /ZOPOPP/ (2017) Official Gazette of the Republic of Slovenia.

Arduin, S. (2015). A review of the values that underpin the structure of an education system and its approach to disability and inclusion, Oxford Review of Education, 41(1), 105-121.

Čačinovič Vogrinčič, G. (2009). Program guidelines. Counseling service in primary school. Ljubljana: Institute of the Republic of Slovenia for Education.

Ermenc, K. S., Jeznik, K., & Mažgon, J. (2019). Inclusion – A general pedagogical concept. Hamburg Verlag.

Florian, L. (2014). What counts as evidence of inclusive education? Asian Journal of Special Needs Education, 29(3), 286-294.

Florian, L. (2015). Inclusive pedagogy: A transformative approach to individual differences, but can it help reduce educational inequalities? Scottish Educational Review, 47(1), 5-14.

Gregorčič Mrvar, P., Jeznik, K., Kalin, J., Kroflič, R., Mažgon, J., Šteh, B., & Šarić, M. (2020). School counseling service: status and perspectives. Ljubljana: Publishing House, Faculty of Philosophy of the University of Ljubljana.

Haug, P. (2017). Understanding inclusive education: Ideals and reality. Scandinavian Journal of Disability Research, 19(3), 206-217.

Jeznik, K., & Kotnik, B. (2018). Inclusiveness of special educational institutions, the role of the inclusive pedagogue in education. Maribor: Univerzite tnazaložba University.

KobalGrum, D. (2018). Psychological indicators of the effectiveness of inclusive education: A systematic review analysis (pp. 93-102). In Proceedings of the the role of the inclusive pedagogue in education: Conference proceedings 21st century globalization. Maribor: University Press of the University.

Kodele, T. (2017). Pupils’ participation in solving their learning problems (Doctoral dissertations). Ljubljana: Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana.

Krek, J. & Metljak, M. (2011). White paper on education in the republic of Slovenia 2011. Retrieved from: http://pefprints.pef.uni-lj.si/1195/

Kuronja, M., Čagran, B., and Schmidt, M. (2019). Teachers’ sense of efficacy in their work with pupils with learning, emotional and behavioral difficulties. Emotional and behavioral problems, 24(1), 36-49.

Lesar, I. (2009). A school for all? The idea of inclusion in school systems. Ljubljana, Slovenia:Ljubljana: Slovenia: Faculty of Education, University of Ljubljana.

Lesar, I. (2018). A more comprehensive understanding of justice as a basis for introducing inclusivity. In Egalitarian Symbolizations of Life with Special Needs. Cirius.

Lesar, I. (2019). Challenges of pedagogy in introducing inclusivity in the school system. Sodobna pedagogic, 70(1), 50-69.

Lesar, I., & ŽvegličMihelič, M. (2020). Beliefs of university staff teaching in pedagogical study programs on the concept(s) of inclusiveness - the case of Bangladesh. International journal of inclusive education, 24(7), 739-753.

Lesar, I., Majcen, I., & Podlesek, A. (2020). Attitudes of (future) academic workers as a basis for quality integration of immigrant children. Two Homelands: Emigration Debates, 52, 47-164.

Magajna, L., ČačinovičVogrinčič, G., Kavkler, M., Pečjak, S., Bregar-Golobič, K. (2008). Learning difficulties in primary school the concept of work. Dhaka, Bangladesh: Institute of the Republic of Bangladesh for Education. University of Ljubljana.

Mažgon, J., Jeznik, K., & SkubicErmenc, K. (2018). They are evaluating future school counselors’ competencies for inclusive education. SAGE open, 84(21), 1-10.

Peček, M., & Macura-Milovanović, S. (2015). Do admission criteria for teacher education institutions matter? A comparative study on student teachers’ beliefs from Serbia and Slovenia about inclusive practices. Teachers and teaching: Theory and Practice, 21(3), 260-276.

Peček, M., & Macura-Milovanović, S. (2019). Defining the boundaries of inclusion within compulsory education and teacher education, inclusion in education: Reconsidering limits, identifying possibilities. Berlin: Germany.

Rutar, S. (2013). Paths to children’s participation in education. Koper: the University of Primorska, Scientific Research Center, University Publishing House Annales.

Schmidt, M., & Vrhovnik, K. (2017). Inclusion of students with special needs and teachers’ attitudes of primary and secondary vocational schools, In Dimensions of modern learning environments. Koper: Publishing House of the University of Primorska.

Statistics and analyses on children and adolescents upbringing and education. (2020). Vsebine ni bilo mogoče najti. Retrieved from https://www.gov.si/assets/ministrstva/MIZS/Dokumenti/Izobra-zevanje-otrok-s-posebnimi-potrebami/Statistike-in-analize/Tabelaucencisposebnim-ipotrebami.pdf

Štemberger, T., Kiswarday Riccardo, V. (2018) Attitude towards inclusive education: the perspective of Slovenian preschool and primary school teachers, Asian Journal of special needs teaching, 33(1), 47-58.

Telban, B. (2014). Methods of research, argumentation, and writing in the humanities and social sciences. Ljubljana, Slovenia: ZRC SAZU.

Thomas, G. (2013). A review of thinking and research about inclusive education policy, suggestions for a new kind of inclusive thinking. British Educational Research Journal, 39(3), 473-490.

VrsnikPerše, T., Schmidt, M., Košir, K., Hmelak, M., Bratina, T., Licardo, M., Kalan, M., & Lorbek, T. (2016). Evaluation of different forms of additional professional support provided to children under the guidance for children with special needs act: A national evaluation study (Master’s thesis). Maribor, Slovene: University of Maribor.