Livelihoods and the Play of Eviction in the Akuarium Neighborhood
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The Jakarta government evicted an urban community of Akuarium in 2016, which caused socio-economic and immaterial difficulties. Such difficulties appear from destroyed livelihoods but instigated a kind of play in the community. A theory of urban play envisages how the community responds and utilizes failed development projects drawing from the practices of graffiti, car jockeys, and navigation of traffic jams. The research method includes field and internet ethnography for around one year. The research uncovers worsening precarious life, plunging the Akuarium community from poverty to severity. The severity includes massive loss of occupations, and houses, unexpected eviction costs, the loss of markets and crowdedness for market support, and the multi-source of income as in small shops and housing rental. The Akuarium people respond with an urban play as a small tactic for survival, responding to violence and difficulty. The urban play includes bringing appliances, mobilizing small mobs, and opening their clothes with only underwear covering the breasts and sexual organs to seek the empathy of apparatuses for stopping the eviction. Akuarium people showed urban play as a claim of space without aggression and a last-resort weapon to sustain urban life, an archetype of resistance through spatial practice.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
References
Ahmett, I., & Salina, T. (2013). Kancil Menyeberang Jalan. Retrieved from http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9DTYH7t7h6w.
Ascensão, E., & Rodrigues, N. (2020). After the Lockdown: Towards an Urban Politics of Care or Back to Evictions as Usual? The Urban Now. Retrieved from https://www.ijurr.org/the-urban-now/after-the-lockdown-towards-an-urban-politics-of-care-or-back-to-evictions-as-usual/.
Bayat, A. (2007). Radical religion and the habitus of the dispossessed: does Islamic militancy have an urban ecology? International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 31(3), 579-590.
Bayat, A. (2015). Plebeians of the Arab spring. Current Anthropology, 56(S11), S33-S43.
Bebbington, A. (2000). Reencountering development: Livelihood transitions and place transformations in the Andes. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90(3), 495-520.
Castro Seixas, E. (2022). Urban (digital) play and right to the city: A critical perspective (pp. 35-39). In Chisik, Y., Schouten, B., Thibault, M., & Nijholt, A., (Eds.). Urban Play and the Playable City: A Critical Perspective. Lausanne: Frontiers Media SA.
Das, V., & Randeria, S. (2015). Politics of the urban poor: aesthetics, ethics, volatility, precarity: an introduction to supplement 11. Current Anthropology, 56(S11), S3-S14.
Doshi, S. (2019). Greening displacements, displacing green: Environmental subjectivity, slum clearance, and the embodied political ecologies of dispossession in Mumbai. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 43(1), 112-132.
Gopaldas, A. (2016). A front-to-back guide to writing a qualitative research article. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal, 19(1), 115-121.
Guntoro. (2020). Resolution for Land Conflict and Fulfilment of Safe Housing in Urban Informal Kampung from Agrarian Reform Perspective (Case Study of Kampung Akuarium, North Jakarta). Indonesia: Sekolah Tinggi Hukum Indonesia Jentera.
Gudeman, S. (2012). Community and economy: economy’s base (pp. 94-106). In Carrier, J. G. (Ed.). A Handbook of Economic Anthropology. Massachusetts, USA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Harms, E. (2012). Beauty as control in the new Saigon: Eviction, new urban zones, and atomized dissent in a Southeast Asian city. American Ethnologist, 39(4), 735-750.
Harms, E. (2016). Luxury and rubble: Civility and dispossession in the new Saigon. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.
Harvey, D. (2008). The Right to the City. Retrieved from https://davidharvey.org/media/righttothecity.pdf
Herzfeld, M. (2009). Evicted from eternity: The restructuring of modern Rome. USA: University of Chicago Press.
Januardy, F. A., Achmadi, J. C., & Fortuna, C. I. (2017). Like rubble: Forced eviction report in DKI Jakarta year 2016. Jakarta: LBH Jakarta.
Kutsche, P. (1998). Field ethnography: A manual for doing cultural Anthropology. US: Prentice Hall.
Lee, D. (2013). “Anybody can do it”: Aesthetic empowerment, urban citizenship, and the naturalization of Indonesian graffiti and street art. City & Society, 25(3), 304-327.
Lee, D. (2015). Absolute traffic: infrastructural aptitude in urban Indonesia. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 39(2), 234-250.
Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on Cities, edited and translated by Kofman E and Lebas E. USA: Blackwell.
Lefever, H. G. (1988). Deep play: Rituals of black male identity in urban ghetto communities. Anthropology and humanism quarterly, 13(1), 11-17.
Jakarta Provincial Government. (1992). Governor Decree No. 640 Year 1992 on Decision for Land/Area Clearance Without Permission from Governor of Jakarta’s Special Region. Governor of Jakarta Special Region Province.
Jakarta Provincial Government. (2018). Final Report of Community Action Plan (CAP) Development for Quality Improvement on Settlement in Penjaringan District, North Jakarta. Sub-department of Housing and Settlement, North Jakarta.
Jakarta Provincial Government. (2020). Governor Regulation No. 118 Year 2020 on Permission for Space Utilization. Governor of Jakarta Special Region Province.
Johnston, C. (2014). Politics in the informalizing metropolis: Displacement, resettlement and unstable negotiations in Uncivil Ahmedabad. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 38(2), 539-557.
Legal Aid Institute-Jakarta. (2017). Like rubble: Forced eviction report in DKI Jakarta year 2016. LBH Jakarta.
Perez, F. (2014). Urbanism as warfare: Planning, property, and displacement in Bogotá (Doctoral dissertation). USA: Harvard University.
Portelli, S., & Lees, L. (2018). Eviction and displacement from the neighbourhood of Douar Wasti in Casablanca, Morocco. The Urban Now. Retrieved from https://www.ijurr.org/the-urban-now/eviction-and-displacement-from-the-neighbourhood-of-douar-wasti-in-casablanca-morocco/
Savirani, A., & Wilson, I. (2018). Distance matters: Social housing for the poor. Inside Indonesia. Retrieved from https://www.insideindonesia.org/distance-matters-social-housing-for-the-poor.
Sade-Beck, L. (2004). Internet ethnography: Online and offline. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 3(2), 45-51.
Scott, J. C. (1985). Weapons of the weak: Everyday forms of peasant resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Setiawan, I., & Aziz, Y. (2017). Igniting hope in Kampung Akuarium (pp. 49-63). In Irfansyah, A. (Ed.). Urban Kampung Record: A Collaboration.
Simone, A. (2015). The urban poor and their ambivalent exceptionalities: Some notes from Jakarta. Current Anthropology, 56(S11), S15-S23.
Sørbøe, C. M., & Braathen, E. (2022). Contentious politics of slums: Understanding different outcomes of community resistance against evictions in Rio de Janeiro. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 46(3), 405-423.
Staples, J. (2007). Introduction: Livelihoods at the margins (pp. 9-30). In Staples, J. (Ed.). Livelihoods at the margins: Surviving the city. Walnut Creek, California: Left Coast Press.
United Nations Housing Rights Programme. (2011). A loss more significant than they think: A review of eviction impact assessment methodologies. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-HABITAT.
United Nations Housing Rights Programme. (2022). World Cities Report 2022: Envisaging the Future of Cities. Nairobi, Kenya: UN-HABITAT.
Wilson, I. (2019). Urban Poor Activism and Political Agency in Post–New Order Jakarta (pp. 99-115). In Dibley, T., & Ford, M. (Eds.). Activists in transition: Progressive politics in democratic Indonesia. Ithaca, New York: Cornell University Press.