A Guideline for Local Elderly Policy Development in Thailand
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
In previous local elder policy research, most studies were fragmented with only some subjects or some steps in the policy process and attention to the local policy process not included explicitly. This article aims to analyze Thai local elderly policy formulation, implementation and evaluation and to propose guidelines for Thai local elderly policy development. This was a qualitative study. Data were collected using in-depth interviews with 40 key informants from 5 local case studies and 8 national organizations, as well as observations and documentary studies. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis and analytic induction.
For the policy content dimensions, the guidelines of policy content development of the case studies aim to make senior citizens happy, self-sufficient, and physically and mentally healthy. The means to achieve this are comprised of the following:1) an economic, career, and income stability dimension; 2) a health dimension; and 3) a social dimension. For the policy process dimensions, the guideline of policy formulation comprises of the following: the related national policy dimension, including developing the mindset of policy actors, developing the content of policies with clarity that is up-to-date and congruent with key agreements or related principles, and developing a participation process and communication of the policy. The local policy dimension is locally aged society strategic planning based on strategic management and objectives and key results (OKRs) derived from the results of data analysis, integration of public policy theory, resource-based view in strategic management theory, and objective and key results to reduce the limitations of the public policy theory and model. This comprises developing policy actors’ mindsets, competencies, and motivations, collecting information, creating participation for analyzing and formulating direction, and making local elderly society strategic plans. The guidelines of policy implementation comprise the following: creating knowledge and understanding, organizing a central organization, implementing a strategic plan, formulating strategies for implementing and integrating amicable coordination of networks, seeking and allocating tangible and intangible resources, developing competencies of local government personnel, network partners, and target groups, creating and developing a culture supporting the aged society, and creating internal and external motivation. The guidelines of policy evaluation comprise the following: the development of the evaluation competency, the growth and ethical mindset, and the development of a participatory local policy evaluation system. Based on the results of this study, the guidelines focus on the intangible resources, the internal motivation, the mindset of policy actors, the coordination and strength of networks, and the upper-level policy factors.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
References
Anderson, J. E. (1994). Public policy making (2nd eds.). NY, United States: Houghton Mifflin.
Birkland, T. A. (2011). An introduction to the policy process: Theories, concepts, and models of public policy making (3rd eds.). NY, United States: M.E. Sharpe.
Chulalongkorn University, & The Ministry of Social Development and Human Security. (2017). Performance monitoring and evaluation project study report of the 2nd National plan on the elderly 2002-2021 phase 3 (2012-2016) (1st ed.). Bangkok, Thailand: College of Population Studies, Chulalongkorn University.
Department of Provincial Administration. (2020). Notification of the department of administrative affairs on notification of administrative information. Bangkok, Thailand: Department of Provincial Administration.
Dunn, W. N. (1994). Public policy analysis: An introduction (2nd eds.). NJ, United States: Prentice Hall.
Dye, T. R. (1978). Policy analysis (2nd eds.). AL, United States: The University of Alabama Press.
Dye, T. R. (1984). Understanding public policy (5th eds.). NJ, United States: Prentice Hall.
Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development Institute, & Mahidol University. (2019). Situation of the Thai elderly 2018 (1st ed.). Bangkok, Thailand: Printery.
Guess, G. M., & Husted, T. (2017). International public policy analysis (1st ed.). NY, United States: Routledge.
Gupta, D. K. (2011). Analyzing public policy concepts, tools, and techniques (2nd eds.). WA, United States: CG Press.
Howlett, M. (2019). Moving policy implementation theory forward: A multiple streams/critical juncture approach. Public Policy and Administration, 34 (4), 405-430.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M., & Perl, A. (2009). Studying public policy: Policy cycles and policy subsystems (3rd eds.). NY, United States: Oxford University Press.
Howlett, M., Ramesh, M, & Wu, X. (2015). Understanding the persistence of policy failures: The role of politics, governance and uncertainty. Public Policy and Administration, 30(3-4), 209- 220.
Keawsomnuk, P. (2022). The relationship between age-friendly cities and community development in a Thai context. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 15(1), 88-97.
Keyes, L., & Benavides, A. (2017). Local government adoption of age friendly policies: An integrated model of responsiveness, multi-level governance and public entrepreneurship theories. Public Administration Quarterly, 41(1) 149-185.
Kraft, M. E., & Furlong. S. R. (2018). Public policy: Politics, analysis, and alternatives (6th eds.). United States, WA: CQ Press.
Lasswell, H. D., & Kaplan, A. (1970). Power and society. NH, United States: Yale University Press.
Mazmanian, D. A., & Sabatier, P. A. (1989). Implementation and public policy. MD, United States: University Press of American.
National Legislative Assembly. (2017). Synthesis of elderly care in Thailand: Problems and suggestions. Bangkok, Thailand: Committee on Social Affairs, Children, Youth, Women, Elderly Persons, Persons with Disabilities and the Underprivileged, The Secretariat of the Senate.
National Research Council of Thailand. (2020). National Research Council of Thailand and Mahidol University disclosing the results of the study of elderly people are at risk best from covid-19. Retrieved from https://www.nrct.go.th/news.
Pattrawiwat, K., Charuchinda, A., Numkanisorn, P., Suvarnasara, C., & Peltzer, K. (2022). Guidelines for developing quality of life for the elderly: A community-based approach. Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies, 22(2), 336-347.
Peter, K., Larrue, C., Varone, F., & Hill, M. (2011). Public policy analysis. Bristol, England: The Policy Press, University of Bristol.
Phayukhiree, S. (2006). Enforcement problems of the Act on the Elderly, B.E. 2546 (2003 A.D.). Bangkok, Thailand: Ramkhamhaeng University.
Sujinkalayanatham, P. (2016). Hua Ngom Senior School. Under the support of the Office of Community Health and the Center for Research and Development of Community Health Systems, Faculty of Nursing, Khon Kaen University. Bangkok, Thailand: Thai Health Promotion Foundation.
Powintara, N. (2018). Public policy, strategic planning, and strategic management (1st ed.). Graduate School of Public Administration, National Institute of Development Administration. Nonthaburi, Thailand: Ratanatrai Press.
Radhakrishan, S. (2017). Public policy: A Contemporary perspective (1st ed.). New Delhi, India: SAGE Publications.
Saetren, H. (2014). Implementing the third generation research paradigm in policy implementation research: An empirical assessment. Public Policy and Administration, 29(2), 84-105.
Scharlach, A. (2012). Creating aging-friendly communities in the United States. Ageing international, 37, 25-38.
Sidney, M. S., Fischer, F., & Miller, G. J. (2007). Handbook of public policy analysis theory, politics, and methods (1st ed.). NY, United States: CRC Press.
Sokdun, P. (2014). Evaluation of the elderly welfare program of the administrative organization. ARU Research Journal, 1(1), 23-29.
Sombat, L., Sakdaporn, T., & Wongweeraprasert, Y. (2012). A Research report on participatory monitoring and evaluation in the elderly work prototype area. Thai Health Promotion Foundation and the Foundation of Thai Gerontology Research and Development Institute. Bangkok, Thailand: Jprint 20.
Suwannarada, W. (2016). Aging society: Moving into an aging society with knowledge and wisdom (1st ed.). Bangkok, Thailand: Printmaking.
Tak, Y. R., Woo, H. Y., Han Yi, L., & Kim, A. R. (2019). Useful lessons for the provision of services in long-term care facilities in South Korea: Operators’ experiences illuminate the phenomenon of working with the elderly in the field. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being, 14(1),1-12.
Thailand Development Research Institute. (2016). TDRI Report on Reshaping the Role of the Public Sector in Public Service: Decentralizing Local Decision-making, 118.
The Act on the Elderly, B.E. 2546. (2003). The Gazette. 120: Chapter 130a, 1-8. Retrieved from https://ratchakitcha.soc.go.th/documents/135212.pdf.
Van Meter, D. S., & Van Horn, C. E. (1975). The policy implementation process: A conceptual framework. Administration and Society, 6(4), 447-448.
Yavapraphat, S., & Wangmahaphon, P. (2012). Public policy at local level in Thailand (1st ed.). Bangkok, Thailand: Gold Point.