EnhancingStudents’Performance on the Test of English Communication in the Workplace(TEC-W) at Saengtham College, Thailand
Main Article Content
Abstract
The study explored the factors influencing students' performance on the TEC-W, examined their perceptions of the factors, and recommended enhancement strategies. The research utilized a mixed-methods design involving 52 third- and fourth-year Philosophy students at Saengtham College. After synthesizing relevant literature, the study identified five factors affecting TEC-W performance: student motivation and attitude, teaching, learning materials and activities in class, outside-classroom preparation, and TEC-W testing. A survey questionnaire was administered to scrutinize the participants' perceptions regarding these factors, and the data was analyzed using descriptive statistics. The findings revealed high satisfaction with teaching (x̄ = 3.72) and learning materials and activities in class (x̄ = 3.60), while student motivation and attitude (x̄ = 3.33), outside-classroom preparation (x̄ = 3.25), and student familiarization with the TEC-W testing (x̄ = 3.12) received moderate average scores. A focus group discussion (FGD) with 20 students was conducted to gain insights on improving TEC-W performance. The study recommends increasing student motivation and confidence in learning English, enhancing teaching quality to align with TEC-W requirements, improving learning materials and classroom resources, encouraging outside-classroom preparation by providing resources for independent study and familiarizing students with TEC-W testing through mock tests to reduce anxiety and improve testing skills.
Highlights
- The study identifies five key factors influencing TEC-W performance: student motivation and attitude, teaching quality, learning materials and in-class activities, outside-classroom preparation, and TEC-W testing.
- Using a mixed-methods design, the research conducted surveys and focus group discussions (FGD) with third- and fourth-year Philosophy students.
- Results show high satisfaction with teaching and classroom materials, but only moderate levels in motivation, outside-classroom preparation, and TEC-W testing.
- The study recommends strategies to build motivation and confidence, improve materials and resources, and use mock tests to enhance TEC-W exam readiness.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
References
Alqahtani, F. (2021). The impact of language testing washback in promoting teaching and learning processes: A theoretical review. English Language Teaching, 14(7), 21-26.
Al-Tameemi, R., Johnson, C., Gitay, R., Abdel-Salam, A.S., Al Hazaa, K., Ben Said, A., & Romanowski, M. (2023). Determinants of poor academic performance among undergraduate students—A systematic literature review. International Journal of Educational Research Open, 4, 1-13.
Athiworakun, C., & Adunyarittigun, D. (2022). Investigating washback effects on teaching: A case study of an exit examination at the higher education level. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition Research Network, 15(2), 776-801.
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. S. (1996). Language testing in practice: Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behaviour change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 192-215.
Benzerroug, S. (2021). Effective language teaching and learning process in EFL classroom situation: A case study. International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 4(8), 54-64.
Brown, D. H. (1994). Principles of language learning and teaching (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.
Charttrakul, K., & Damnet, A. (2021). Role of the CEFR and English teaching in Thailand: A case study of Rajabhat University. Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 12(2), 82-89.
Chen, H. (2024). Innovative approaches in English language teaching: Integrating communicative methods and technology for enhanced proficiency. In Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development (pp. 214–220). New York, NY: New York University.
Cheng, L. (1997). How does washback influence teaching? Implications for Hong Kong. Language and Education, 11(1), 38-54.
Deci, E., Vallerand, R., & Ryan, R. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 326-346.
Gardner, R. (1985). Social psychology and second language learning: The role of attitude and motivation. London, England: British Library Cataloguing in Public Data.
Gardner, R. C. (2004). Attitude/motivation test battery: International AMTB research project. Retrieved from https://publish.uwo.ca/~gardner/docs/AMTBmanual.pdf
George, D., & Mallery, P. (2003). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 11.0 update (4th eds.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Green, A. (2007). IELTS washback in context: Preparation for academic writing in higher education. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Hanushek, A. E. (1997). Assessing the effects school resources on student performance: An update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141-164.
Heni, H. (2024). Factors affect in IELTS test for students of STIKOM Uyelindo Kupang. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 10(4), 4578-4584.
Islam, F., Krishna, A., & Kumar, D. (2025). Factors influencing academic performance: An empirical study using predictive analytics. Multidisciplinar (Montevideo), 3(51), 1-7.
Kathryn, H. (2023). Self-efficacy for self-regulated learning mediates association between implicit theories of willpower and learning strategies. Journal of Experimental Education, 92(3), 502-512.
Kusurkar, R., Cate, T., Vos, C., Westers, P., & Croiset, G. (2013). How motivation affects academic performance: A structural equation modelling analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education: Theory and Practice, 18(1), 57-69.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. (2020). Practical research: Planning and design (12th eds.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
Marginingsih, M., & Makmun, S. (2020). Factors affecting TOEIC achievement of the first semester students of informatics engeneering. Syntax Literate Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 5(7), 354-364.
Naeem, M., Ozuem, W., Howell, K., & Ranfagni, S. (2023). A step-by-step process of thematic analysis to develop a conceptual model in qualitative research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 22, 1-18.
Namfah, N. (2022). Perception towards the CEFR-based English proficiency test: A case of the student-teacher in the teacher for local development project at one university in Thailand. Journal of Education Burapha University, 33(3), 16-38.
NIETS. (2023). Test of English Communication in the Workplace. Retrieved from https://www.niets.or.th/en/content/view/25557
NIETS. (2024). Test of English Communication in the Workplace. Retrieved from https://www.niets.or.th/th/content/view/26317
Norman, G. (2010). Likert scales, levels of measurement, and the “laws” of statistics. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 15(5), 625-632.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th eds.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Saengtham College. (2024). Report on the TEC-W results for third- and fourth-year students in the Philosophy Study Program 2023–2024 at Saengtham College [Unpublished report]. Nakhon Pathom, Thailand: Saengtham College.
Sae-Ong, U., & Mohamed Ismail, S. (2021). Mind your gap between entry English proficiency and graduation expectation. Asean TESOL Journal, 1(1), 1-9.
Satria, A., & Zahraa, S. A. (2018). The factors affecting TOEIC passing grades in TOEIC intensive course for third year students. Inovish Journal, 3(2), 221-229.
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26(3-4), 207-231.
Tomlinson, B., & Masuhara, H. (2018). The complete guide to the theory and practice of materials development for language teaching. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley Blackwell.
Waluyo, B. (2024). Technology-fused English teaching and learning in higher education: From individual differences to being different individuals. LEARN Journal: Language Education and Acquisition, 17(2), 42-47.
Wat-aksorn, P. (2021). CEFR and English proficiency development of the Royal Thai Navy. Royal Thai Navy Medical Journal, 48(1), 241-248.
Wolsey, T. D. (2024). Self‐assessment in reading. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118784235.eelt0497.pub2
Wutthayakorn, J., & Sawatdigomon, K. (2023). Development of English language Tests for Workplace Communication (TEC-W). Retrieved from https://tecw.niets.or.th/
Yusmei, N., Sesmiarni, Z., Maimori , R., & Albert, A. (2022). Developing English learning materials for specific purposes with culture perspective. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan Indonesia, 1(2), 141-148.
