Post-COVID-19 Behavioral Determinants of Unmanned Aircraft Adoption in Bangkok’s Urban Mobility
Main Article Content
Abstract
In recent years, public transportation has evolved to offer faster and more efficient options. One emerging concept is using unmanned aircraft for vertical take-off and landing (VTOL-UAs) to enhance urban mobility. Although not yet implemented in Thailand or abroad, this study examines factors influencing the decision to use unmanned aircraft for public transportation in the Bangkok Metropolitan Region. Guided by the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT), the researchers collected data from 1,200 participants through face-to-face questionnaires and analyzed the responses using Structural Equation Modeling (SEM). The results indicate a strong willingness among participants to use unmanned aircraft and share flights if such options become available. Gender differences significantly influenced decision-making, while age showed no overall impact, though respondents under 30 expressed the most positive attitudes. SEM analysis identified achievement, social influence, convenience, and performance as key factors, with weights of 0.325, 0.217, 0.193, and 0.143. These findings provide valuable insights for developing unmanned aircraft as a mass transit option, with implications for the public and private sectors. Educational institutions may also use these results to guide curriculum development in transportation and unmanned aircraft systems.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Copyright: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
References
Ahmed, S. S., Fountas, G., Eker, U., Still, S. E., & Anastasopoulos, P. C. (2021). An exploratory empirical analysis of willingness to hire and pay for flying taxis and shared flying car services. Journal of Air Transport Management, 90, 101963.
Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes.
Anwari, N., Ahmed, M. T., Islam, M. R., Hadiuzzaman, M., & Amin, S. (2021). Exploring the travel behavior changes caused by the COVID-19 crisis: A case study for a developing country. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 9, 100334.
Bhaduri, E., Manoj, B., Wadud, Z., Goswami, A. K., & Choudhury, C. F. (2020). Modelling the effects of COVID-19 on travel mode choice behaviour in India. Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, 8, 100273.
Butilă, E. V., & Boboc, R. G. (2022). Urban Traffic Monitoring and Analysis Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicles (UAVs): A Systematic Literature Review. Remote Sensing, 14(3), 620.
Chamata, J. (2017). Factors delaying the adoption of civil drones: a primitive framework. The International Technology Management Review, 6(4), 125-132.
Cohen, A. P., Shaheen, S. A., & Farrar, E. M. (2021). Urban air mobility: History, ecosystem, market potential, and challenges. Ieee transactions on intelligent transportation systems, 22(9), 6074-6087.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw, P. (1989). Technology acceptance model. J Manag Sci, 35(8), 982-1003.
Elevate, U. (2016). Fast Forwarding to a Future of On-Demand Urban Air Transportation (2016). In.
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.
Hair, J., Black, W., Babin, B., & Anderson, R. (2010). Mulfivariate data analysis: Internafional version. Pearson, New Jersey.
Jutamart, S., & Mana, L. A. (2023). Factors Influencing Travelers' Decision-Making on Microtransit Services in Bangkok: a Case Study of MuvMi. Journal of Social Science Panyapat, 5(3), 303-320.
Lidynia, C., Philipsen, R., & Ziefle, M. (2017). Droning on about drones—acceptance of and perceived barriers to drones in civil usage contexts. Paper presented at the Advances in Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems: Proceedings of the AHFE 2016 International Conference on Human Factors in Robots and Unmanned Systems, July 27-31, 2016, Walt Disney World®, Florida, USA.
Loubser, J., Marnewick, A. L., & Joseph, N. (2021). Framework for the potential user base of mobility as a service. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 39, 100583.
Organization, EASA. (2020). Certification and safety standards for unmanned aircraft systems (UAS).
Organization, FAA. (2020). FAA’s roadmap for unmanned aircraft systems integration: Meeting the challenges of safe integration. U.S. Department of Transportation.
Organization, ICAO. (2015). Doc 10019 /AN/ 507 (Manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems: RPAS, 1st Edition.
Organization, ICAO. (2015). Unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) and their integration into the airspace: A global approach. ICAO Circular 328.
Pakpisutkul, R. (2022). Factors Influencing Intention to Use Mobility as a Service (MaaS) in Bangkok. Paper presented at the The 28th National Convention on Civil Engineering, TRL04-1.
PARK, S. W. (2021). Social acceptability of urban air mobility by aircraft category and autonomous phases. KDI School,
Rajendran, S., Srinivas, S., & Grimshaw, T. (2021). Predicting demand for air taxi urban aviation services using machine learning algorithms. Journal of Air Transport Management, 92, 102043.
Rhindress, M. (2008). Understanding how to motivate communities to support and ride public transportation (Vol. 122): Transportation Research Board.
Rice, S., Winter, S. R., Mehta, R., & Ragbir, N. K. (2019). What factors predict the type of person who is willing to fly in an autonomous commercial airplane? Journal of Air Transport Management, 75, 131-138.
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., & Hair, J. F. (2021). Partial least squares structural equation modeling. In Handbook of market research (pp. 587-632): Springer.
Straubinger, A., Verhoef, E. T., & De Groot, H. L. (2021). Will urban air mobility fly? The efficiency and distributional impacts of UAM in different urban spatial structures. Transportation research part C: emerging technologies, 127, 103124.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. A. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information systems research, 6(2), 144-176.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Venkatesh, V., Thong, J. Y., & Xu, X. (2012). Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS quarterly, 157-178.
Wickens, C. D., Helton, W. S., Hollands, J. G., & Banbury, S. (2021). Engineering psychology and human performance: Routledge.
Winter, S. R., Rice, S., & Lamb, T. L. (2020). A prediction model of Consumer's willingness to fly in autonomous air taxis. Journal of Air Transport Management, 89, 101926.
Zhang, X., Guan, H., Zhu, H., & Zhu, J. (2019). Analysis of travel mode choice behavior considering the indifference threshold. Sustainability, 11(19), 5495.
