THE EFFECT OF 5E INQUIRY APPROACH AND ANALYTICAL QUESTIONS TO PROMOTE ANALYTICAL THINKING AND LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT ON LINEAR MOTION IN PHYSICS OF 10TH GRADE STUDENTS ผลการจัดการเรียนรู้แบบสืบเสาะหาความรู้ 5 ขั้น ร่วมกับคำถามเชิงวิเคราะห์เพื่อพัฒนาการคิดวิเคราะห์และผลสัมฤทธิ์ทางการเรียนวิชาฟิสิกส์ เรื่อง การเคลื่อนที่แนวตรง ของนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 4

Main Article Content

Kornkanok Tasikhaow
Saran Phibanchan
Chade Sirisawat

Abstract

The purpose of this research was to develop the analytical thinking and the learning achievement by 5E inquiry approach and analytical questions on linear motion in Physics subjects. The target group of this study was 10th grade students at Seansuk School. The instruments used in this study were the lesson plans of 5E inquiry approach and analytical questions on linear motion in Physics subjects, analytical thinking test on linear motion in Physics and learning achievement test on linear motion in Physics. The data were analyzed by effect size score. The results of the research were
1. The analytical thinking of linear motion after using 5E inquiry approach and analytical questions was higher than before learning and had high effect size score.
2. The post-test mean scores on analytical thinking of linear motion after using 5E inquiry approach and analytical questions were higher than 70 percent of criterion.
3. The learning achievement of linear motion after using 5E inquiry approach and analytical questions was higher than before learning and had high effect size score.
4. The post-test mean scores on learning achievement of linear motion after using 5E inquiry approach and analytical questions were higher than 70 percent of criterion.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Tasikhaow, K. ., Phibanchan, S. ., & Sirisawat, C. . (2019). THE EFFECT OF 5E INQUIRY APPROACH AND ANALYTICAL QUESTIONS TO PROMOTE ANALYTICAL THINKING AND LEARNING ACHIEVEMENT ON LINEAR MOTION IN PHYSICS OF 10TH GRADE STUDENTS : ผลการจัดการเรียนรู้แบบสืบเสาะหาความรู้ 5 ขั้น ร่วมกับคำถามเชิงวิเคราะห์เพื่อพัฒนาการคิดวิเคราะห์และผลสัมฤทธิ์ทางการเรียนวิชาฟิสิกส์ เรื่อง การเคลื่อนที่แนวตรง ของนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 4. JOURNAL OF EDUCATION NARESUAN UNIVERSITY, 23(4), 58–68. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/article/view/152251
Section
Research Articles

References

Baka, A., Khachonpisitsak, S., & Sirisawat, C. (2017). Development of grade 10 students learning achievement and analytical thinking by teaching management through 7E learning cycle with analytical questioning technique. Journal of education Naresuan University, 19(2), 120-133. [in Thai]

Bloom, B. A. (1956). Taxonomy of education objective handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York: David McKay Company.

Kosum, S., & Kumwajnung, D. (2006). Teach kids to think. Bangkok: Academic Promotion Center Press. [in Thai]

Moonkum, S., & Moonkum, O. (2002). 21 learning management methods: for develop thinking procedure (5th ed.). Bangkok: Phabpim. [in Thai]

National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). (2015). Ordinary national educational test (O-NET) Mathayomsuksa 6 Academic year 2014. Bangkok: National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). [in Thai]

National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). (2016). Ordinary national educational test (O-NET) Mathayomsuksa 6 Academic year 2015. Bangkok: National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). [in Thai]

National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). (2017). Ordinary national educational test (O-NET) Mathayomsuksa 6 Academic year 2016. Bangkok: National Institute of Educational Testing Service (Public Organization). [in Thai]

Nonsrichai, S. (2007). The analytical thinking and achievement of Mathayomsuksa 5 in studying biology through cycles (5Es) (Master thesis). Khon Kaen: Khon Kaen University. [in Thai]

Office for National Education Standards and Quality Assessment (Public Organization). (2011). External quality assessment of school. [n.p.]. [in Thai]

Pattiyathani, S. (2006). Learning achievement evaluation (5th ed.). Kalasin: Prasarn Press. [in Thai]

Saiyos, L. (2000). Evaluation on learning achievement technique (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Suweeriyasan. [in Thai]

Sanitboon, S., Phipanchon, S., Sirisawat, C. (2016). The effect of 5E inquiry approach and analytical questions of 12th grade students on science concepts and scientific analytical thinking on atomic physics. Journal of Graduate School Sakon Nakhon Rajabhat University, 8(22), 197-207. [in Thai]

Sariwat, L. (2006). Thinking. Bangkok: Odian Store. [in Thai]

Savathanaphaibul, S. (1986). Science for primary teacher. Bangkok: Srinakharinwirot University. [in Thai]

Suthirut, C. (2010). New education administration. Nonthaburi: Sahamitprinting and Publishing. [in Thai]

Suworratrai, U., Choomponla, C., & Vollakitkasemskul, S. (2014). The effect of CIPPA model supplemented with using questions emphasizing analytical thinking on science achievement and analytical thinking abilities of Mathayomsuksa 3 students. Udon Thani Rajabhat University Academic Journal, 2(2), 129-143. [in Thai]

Most read articles by the same author(s)