STUDY OF SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ISSUE APPROACH WITH REFLECTION OF USING SOCIAL MEDIA TO ENHANCE SOCIOSCIENTIFIC DECISION MAKING ABOUT HUMAN AND ENVIRONMENT FOR 12TH GRADE STUDENTS การจัดการเรียนรู้ด้วยประเด็นทางสังคมที่เกี่ยวข้องกับวิทยาศาสตร์ ผนวกการสะท้อนคิดผ่านเครือข่ายสังคมออนไลน์ เพื่อส่งเสริมความสามารถในการตัดสินใจประเด็นทางสังคมที่เกี่ยวข้องกับวิทยาศาสตร์ เรื่อง มนุษย์กับสิ่งแวดล้อม สำหรับนักเรียนชั้นมัธยมศึกษาปีที่ 6
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
The purposes of this action research were to study how learning management using socioscientific issue (SSI) with reflection of using social media about human and environment for 12th grade students and to study the result of learning management for enhancing socioscientific decision making. The participants were 28 of 12th grade students from one high school in Phitsanulok. The research instruments used in this study were: 3 lesson plans using socioscientific issue approach with reflection of using social media, the learning management reflection, the participation report, and socioscientific decision making ability test, Collecting data from learning management reflection was analyzed by content analysis to reflect learning management and the data of SSI decision making ability were calculated and shown in summary through mean and percent. The findings found that using learning management through socioscientific issue with reflection of using social media were as follows; 1) analyzing problems, Up-to-date SSI information and real life relevant issue should be presented, 2) data collection, using jigsaw technique to collect data relevant to stakeholders on the issue was successful, 3) understanding the issues, there was an issue revision using discussion of relevant information, 4) role play, debates and situational outfits could encourage students’ learning, and 5) reflection of using social media, students were encouraged to revise their own decisions, as a result, students’ SSI decisions making ability could be enhanced using socioscientific issue and students’ learning outcome were better. Thereby, the students have improved the reasoning abilities at their best.
Article Details
The owner of the article does not copy or violate any of its copyright. If any copyright infringement occurs or prosecution, in any case, the Editorial Board is not involved in all the rights to the owner of the article to be performed.
References
Atabey, N., & Arslan, A. (2020). The effect of teaching socio-scientific issues with cooperative learning model on pre-service teachers' argumentation qualities. İlköğretim Online, 19. 10.17051/ilkonline.2020.689681
Auttaput, P., Sittiwong, T., & Teeraputon, D. (2017). The effects of using social network and active learning the design and production of computer graphics course for undergraduate students. Journal of Education Naresuan University, 19(2), 145-154. [in Thai]
Charmonman, S. (2011). Using Facebook as a center of education. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from www.dmaonline.com [in Thai]
Department of Environmental Quality Promotion. (2008). Crisis environmental education must hurry. Green line, 24(24). 1-19. [in Thai]
Department of Environmental Quality Promotion. (2015). Action plan of ASEAN environmental education 2014-2018. Retrieved September 10, 2018, from http://www.teeid.deqp.go.th [in Thai]
Eggert, S., & Bogeholz, S. (2009). Students’ use of decision-making strategies with regard to socioscientific issues: An application of the rasch partial credit model. Science Education, 230-258.
Jimenez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Pereiro-Munoz, C. (2002). Knowledge producers or knowledge consumers? Argumentation and decision making about environmental management. International Journal of Science Education, 24(11), 1171–1190.
Ketsing, J. (2018). Environmental education for school. Bangkok: Vista Inter Print. [in Thai]
Khumwong, P. (2008). Learning science from socioscientific issue. In seminar documents topic How to teach science in accordance with the urban context. [in Thai]
Kijkuakul, S. (2014). Learning management science, Direction for teachers in the 21st century. Phetchabun: Junladiskanpim publisher. (in Thai)
Klosterman, M., Sadler, T., & Brown, J. (2012). Science teachers’ use of mass media to address socio-scientific and sustainability issues. Science Education, 42(1), 51-74.
Lee, Y. C., & Grace, M. (2012). Students’ reasoning and decision making about a socio-scientific issue: A cross-context comparison. Science Education, 96(5), 787-807.
Loucks-Horsley, S., Love, N., Stiles, K. E., Mundry, S., & Hewson, P. W. (2003). Designing professional development for teachers of science and mathematics (2nd ed.). United States of America: Sage Publication.
Malisuwun, S. (2013). Social network. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from www.vcharkarn.com [in Thai]
National Park Innovation Center and Land Protection Area Phitsanulok. (2013). Study report on general conditions of economy, society, culture, participation attitudes and dependence on the resources of communities living near the Mae Wong Dam Dam. Retrieved September 12, 2018, from http://park.dnp.go.th [in Thai]
Office of the National Economics and Social Development Council. (2015). Direction of the national economic and social development plan 12th Plan. Retrieved September 10, 2018, from http://www.sukhothai.go.th [in Thai]
Office of the National Education Commission. (2000). Quality of teachers to learning quality. (Surasak labmala, Trans.). Bangkok: Office of the National Education Commission. [in Thai]
Pitiporntapin, S., & Butkatunyoo, O. (2014). Developing of Thai pre-service teachers’ competencies science teaching based on science, technology, and society (STS) approach by constructivist learning integrated with reflection through social network. Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences Mahasarakham University, 33(5), 28-44. (in Thai)
Sadler, T. D. (2002). Socioscientific issue research and its relevance for science education. Florida: University of South Florida.
Sadler, T. D., & Donnelly, L. A. (2006). Socioscientific argumentation: The effects of content knowledge and morality. International Journal of Science Education, 28, 1463– 1488.
Sadler, T. D., Foulk, J. A., & Friedrichsen, P. J. (2017). Evolution of a model for socioscientific issue teaching and learning. International Journal of Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 5(2), 75-87.
Sadler, T. D., Klosterman, M. L., & Topcu, M. S. (2011). Learning science content and socio-scientific reasoning through classroom explorations of global climate change. In T.D. Sadler (ed), Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research (pp. 45-77). New York: Springer.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. (2003). Teaching bad science: Highlighting the past to understand the present. The Science Teacher, 70(9), 36-40.
Sadler, T. D., & Zeidler, D. (2005). Patterns of informal reasoning in the context of socioscientific decision making. Journal of Research Science Teaching, 42(1), 112-138.
Salvato, E., & Testa, I. (2012). Improving students’ use of content knowledge when dealing with socio-scientific issues: the case of a physics-based intervention. Quaderni di Ricerca in Didattica, 3, 15-36.
Siribunnam, S. (2014). Socio-scientific decision making in the science classroom. International Journal for Cross-Disciplinary Subjects in Education, 5(4), 1777-1782.
Tekbiyik, A. (2015). The use of jigsaw collaborative learning method in teaching socioscientific issues: The case of nuclear energy. Journal of Baltic science Education, 14(2), 237-253.
Yueh, M. H., Yen, H. K., Yen, T. L., & Shu, C. C. (2008). Toward interactive mobile synchronous learning environment with context-awareness service. Computers & Education, 51(3), 1205-1226.
Zeidler, D. L. (2003). The role of moral reasoning on socioscientific issues and discourse in science education. The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.
Zeidler, D., & Nichols, B. (2009). Socioscientific issues: Theory and practice. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 21(2), 49-58.