DEVELOPMENT OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT OF TEACHERS' RESEARCH MINDSET การพัฒนาเครื่องมือวัดกรอบคิดติดยึดด้านการวิจัยของครู

Main Article Content

Wipawee Siriluk
Suwimon Wongwanich
Chayut Piromsombat

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to develop the measurement instrument of teachers’ research mindset. Data were obtained from 502 teachers under Office of the Basic Education Commission and were collected by using a 5-point multidimensional-within-item rating scale. The data were then analyzed by confirmatory factor analysis. The research findings were as follows:
1. The measurement instrument of teachers’ research mindset consists of 3 components: thought towards research, feelings towards research, and research behaviors. The contents of the statements in
the measurement tool are related to classroom research according to plan, act, observe, and reflect (PAOR).
2. The measurement instrument of teachers’ research mindset has content validity as examine by experts. The Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficients ranged between .49-.74. Is also has construct validity as shown by the model fit with the empirical data (χ2 (30, N=502) = 38.93, p = .13, CFI = .99, TLI= .99, SRMR = .02,
RMSEA = .02).

Article Details

How to Cite
Siriluk, W. ., Wongwanich, S. ., & Piromsombat, C. . (2020). DEVELOPMENT OF MEASUREMENT INSTRUMENT OF TEACHERS’ RESEARCH MINDSET: การพัฒนาเครื่องมือวัดกรอบคิดติดยึดด้านการวิจัยของครู. Journal of Education and Innovation, 24(1), 259–268. Retrieved from https://so06.tci-thaijo.org/index.php/edujournal_nu/article/view/239054
Section
Research Articles

References

Cho, E., & Kim, S. (2015). Cronbach's coefficient alpha: well known but poorly understood, Organizational Research Method, 18(2), 207-230. DOI: 10.1177/109442811455994

Cobanoglu, C., Warde, B., & Moreo, P. J. (2001). A comparison of mail, fax and web-based survey methods, International Journal of Market Research, 43(4), 405-410. DOI: 10.1177/147078530104300401

Davis, J., Clayton, C., & Broome, J. (2017). Thinking like researchers: Action research and its impact on novice teachers’ thinking. Educational Action Research, 26(1), 1-16. DOI: 10.1080/09650792.2017.1284012

Dweck, C. S., Chiu, C. Y., & Hong, Y. Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological inquiry, 6(4), 267-285.

Dweck, C. S., Walton, G. M., & Cohen, G. L. (2011). Academic tenacity: Mindsets and skills that promote long-term learning. Gates Foundation. Seattle, WA: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.

Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Boston.

Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.

Hartig, J., & Höhler, J. (2009). Multidimensional IRT models for the assessment of competencies. Studies in Educational Evaluation, 35(3), 57-63. DOI: 10.1016/j.stueduc.2009.10.002

Kiatsornsri, K. (2011). An analysis of factors, level, and related variables of research engagement of teachers (Master thesis). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]

MacCallum, R. C., Browne, M. W., & Sugawara, H. M. (1996). Power analysis and determination of sample size for covariance structure modeling. Psychological Methods, 1, 130-149.

McEachern, K. P., & Horton, J. L. (2016). Developing a research identity: Promoting a research mindset among faculty and students. The Educational Forum, 80(4), 444-456. DOI: 10.1080/00131725.2016.1206159

Pelton, R. P. (2010). Action research for teacher candidates. Maryland: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.

Prasertsin, U. (2012). Research and development of teachers’ research engagement using empowerment technique (Doctoral dissertation). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University. [in Thai]

Preacher, K. J., & Coffman, D. L. (2006). Computing power and minimum sample size for RMSEA. [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://quantpsy.org

Rawanprakhon, P., & Tayraukham, S. (2017). The development of multidimensional essay test. Journal of Community Development Research (Humanities and Social Sciences), 10(4), 13-23. [in Thai]

Seider, S. N., & Lemma, P. (2004). Perceived effects of action research on teachers' professional efficacy, inquiry mindsets and the support they received while conducting projects to intervene into student learning. Educational Action Research, 12(2), 219-238.

Taraban, R., & Logue, E. (2012). Academic factors that affect undergraduate research experiences. Journal of educational psychology, 104(2), 499-514. DOI: 10.1037/a0026851

Wongwanich, S. (2016). Classroom action research (18th ed.). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press. [in Thai]