WHOLE SCHOOL PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT FOR COMPENTENCY-BASED INSTRUCTION THROUGH PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITY IN PHUKET PROVINCE
Main Article Content
Abstract
In Thailand, reform efforts are often unsuccessful because they failed to understand that teachers play a key role in making educational reforms successful. The competency-based school curriculum development is a key mechanism for successful implementation of the national curriculum framework. However, the problem discovered is that schools continue to lack knowledge and clear guidelines. Teacher and School Quality Program (TSQP) was continuous project that funded by the Equitable Education Fund (EEF), Thailand. This project was a long‐term school professional development program (PD) that aimed to educating and coaching teachers and school principal to conduct competency- based instruction (CBI) through active learning. Whole school approach was used as PD design framework. The research objective was to identify, follow and document the processes that science teachers went through as they assimilated. The research accompanied the PD program throughout its 2‐year period. There were 25 science teachers, 25 school principals and 4 supervisors who took part in the PD program, were exposed to CBI including coaching skills. The research instruments included teacher portfolios, which contained projects and reflection questionnaires, classroom observations, teacher interviews, and teachers feedback questionnaires. The portfolios contained the projects that the teachers had carried out during the PD program, which included case studies and accompanying student activities. We found that the teachers gradually moved from exposure to new teaching methods and subject matter, through active learning lessons that were an integration-based project, to interdisciplinary, active classroom teaching using the real world situation/ phenomena they developed. Their teaching plans were flexible to student’s learning that these teachers gathered along with their practices. Qualitative and Quantitative data confirms these science teachers have positive prospective on CBI and their practices are moving forward to more open-inquiry instruction through providing active learning with overlapping multiple disciplines that are examined.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The owner of the article does not copy or violate any of its copyright. If any copyright infringement occurs or prosecution, in any case, the Editorial Board is not involved in all the rights to the owner of the article to be performed.
References
Bentley, T. (2017). Brief comments on Creating new value and Taking responsibility section of Education 2030. Education 2030 - Conceptual learning framework: Background papers The Future of Education and Skills: Education 2030. The 6th Informal Working Group (IWG) Meeting (p. 95). Paris: France.
Chernus, K., & Fowler, D. (2010). Integrated curriculum: Lessons for adult education from career and technical Education. National Institute for Literacy. Washington DC.
CTGV. (1992). The Jasper series as an example of anchored instruction: Theory, program description, and assessment data. Educational Psychologist, 27, 291–315
Dare, E. A., Ellis, J. A., & Roehrig, G. H. (2018). Understanding science teachers’ implementations of integrated STEM curricular units through a phenomenological multiple case study. International Journal of STEM Education, 5, 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-018-0101-z
Fogarty, R. (1991). How to Integrate the Curricula. Palatine, IL: IRI/Skylight Publishing.
Guskey, T. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Hau, N. H., Cuong, T. V., & Tinh, T. T. (2020). Students and teachers’ perspectives of the importance of arts in steam education in Vietnam. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(11), 666-671.
Humphreys, A. H., Post, T. R., & Elli, A. K. (1981). Interdisciplinary methods, a thematic approach. Softcover, Goodyear.
Jensen, E. (1998). Teaching with the brain in mind. Virginia USA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum development Alexandria.
Kain, D. L. (1993). Cabbages and kings: Research directions in integrated/interdisciplinary curriculum. The Journal of Educational Thought, 27(3), 312-331.
Krajcik, J. S., Blumenfeld, P. C., Marx, R. W., Bass, K. M., Fredricks, J., & Soloway, E. (1998). Inquiry in project-based science classrooms: Initial attempts by middle school students. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 313–350.
Linn, M. C. (1992). The computer as learning partner: Can computer tools teach science? In L. Sheingold, G. Roberts, & S.M. Malcolm (Eds.), This year in school science 1991: Technology for teaching and learning (pp. 31–69). Washington, DC: American Association for the Advancement of Science.
Linn, M. C. (1997). Learning and instruction in science education: Taking advantage of technology. In D. Tobin & B.J. Fraser (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 265–293). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer
Loepp, F. L. (1999). Models of curriculum integration. Retrieved from http://scholar.lib.vt.edu/ejournals/JOSTS/Summer-Fall-1999/Loepp.html
Mangkhang, C. (2017). Ideology: Social Studies Curriculum for all. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.
Penner, D. E., Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (1998). From physical models to biomechanics: Adesign-based modeling approach. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 7, 429–449.
Ryu, M., Mentzer, N., & Knobloch, N. (2018). Preservice teachers’ experiences of STEM integration: Challenges and implications for integrated STEM teacher preparation. International journal of technology and design education, 29(3), 1–20.
Scardamalia, M., & Bereiter, C. (1992). Text-based and knowledge-based questioning by children. Cognition and Instruction, 9(3), 177–199.
Sparks, D., & Loucks-Horsley, S. (1989). Five models of staff development for teachers. Journal of Staff Development, 10(4), 40–57.
United Nations. (2015). World Population Ageing 2015. New York: Department of Economic and Social Affairs Population Division.
Wahono, B., Lin, P. L., & Chang, C. Y. (2020). Evidence of STEM enactment effectiveness in Asian student learning outcomes. International Journal of STEM Education, 7, 36