INDICATOR DEVELOPMENT OF UPRIGHT SCHOOL IN THE PRIMARY SCHOOL GOVERNMENT INSPECTORATE AREA 5
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research aimed at 1) developing Indicators of Upright School in the primary schools under Government Inspectorate Area 5, and 2) validating the structure of the model of indicators of Upright School in the primary schools under Government Inspectorate Area 5. The 5-point scale questionnaire was distributed to 849 respondents including school directors, teachers and members of education committee. The data was analyzed using Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA). The results indicated that:
1. The indicators of Upright School in the primary schools under Government Inspectorate Area include 5 main components, 20 sub-components, and 90 indicators, which were 1) Transparency including 4 sub-components and 19 indicators; 2) public mind including 4 sub-components and 16 indicators; 3) Honesty including 4 sub-components and 19 indicators; 4) Discipline including 4 sub-components and 17 indicators; and 5) Justice including 4 sub-components and 19 indicators.
2. The measurement model of indicators of Upright School was highly consistent with empirical data, as indicated by a Chi-square () value of 24.623, degrees of freedom (df) of 18, a P-value of 0.136, implying that the Chi-square (
) was not statistically significant. The Goodness of Fit Index (GFI) was 0.997, the Adjusted Goodness of Fit Index (AGFI) was 0.966, and the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation (RMSEA) was 0.021. Factor loading (λ) include 5 main components have positive values ranging from 0.87– 1.00. 1) Transparency (λ was 1.00, R2 was 1.00), 2) public mind ( λ was 0.98, R2 was 0.96), 3) Honesty ( λ was 0.90, R2 was 0.81), 4) Discipline ( λ was 0.90, R2 was 0.82), and 5) Justice ( λ was 0.87, R2 was 0.76).
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
The owner of the article does not copy or violate any of its copyright. If any copyright infringement occurs or prosecution, in any case, the Editorial Board is not involved in all the rights to the owner of the article to be performed.
References
Announcement from the Office of the Prime Minister regarding the announcement of the master plan under the national strategy (2018-2037). (2019, 18 April). Royal Gazette, 1-24.
Aunjanam, S. (2017, July–December). Indicators of being a learning community for personnel under Mahamakutraj University. Yanasangworn Research Institute Journal, 8(2), 158-168.
Dewantara, J. A., Hermawan, Y., Yunus, D., Prasetiyo, W. H., Efriani, Arifiyanti, F., & Nurgiansah, T. H. (2021). Anti-corruption education as an effort to form students with character humanist and law-compliant. Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan, 18(1), 70–81.
Farrell, A. M., & Rudd, J. M. (2009). Factor analysis and discriminant validity: A brief review of some practical issues. In D. Tojib (Ed.), ANZMAC 2009 Conference Proceedings.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2010). Multivariate data analysis (7th ed.). New York: Pearson.
Jaruthamprapas, P. (2019). Good governance for administration. Wang Student Journal, 21(1), 43-53.
Katapunyo, P., Thitpanyo, P., & Krairat, T. (2018). Book Review: Book Review Discipline is Bigger than you think. Dhammathit Academic Journal, 18(3), 455-465.
Najih, M., & Wiryan, F. (2021, May). Perspectives on integrating anti-corruption curriculum in Indonesian Secondary School Education. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 21(93), 1-16.
Nitipun, W. (2020). An upright school management model for administrators in the primary schools under the Office of the Basic Education Commission (Doctoral dissertation). Bangkok: Mahamakut Buddhist University.
Nitiphan, W. (2020). Upright School Administration Model of Administrators of Primary Education Institutions. Under the Office of the Basic Education Commission. Journal of MCU Pali Suksa Buddhakos Review, 6(2), 84-98.
Office of the Basic Education Commission. (2016). Guidelines for Operating the Honest School Project. Bangkok: National Buddhist Office Printing House.
Office of Innovation Development for Other Education. (2021). Report on the Performance of Morality and Success in the Online Education Area Office for the year 2020. Bangkok: Mata Printing.
Phuenil, T. (2020). Developing guidelines to promote desirable characteristics, values, and moral principles of secondary school students. Bangkok: Faculty of Humanities, Ramkhamhaeng University.
Rueangkaew, T. (2021). Evaluating the 5 Characteristics of Upright School. In the Workshop Integrating Cooperation in Combating Corruption and Misconduct Educational Service Area Office Level Fiscal year 2021 (pp. 3-4). Surat Thani: Office of the Basic Education Commission.
Sangsarapan, K. (2019). Development of indicators of academic leadership competency of secondary school administrators under the Office of the Basic Education Commission (Doctoral dissertation). Chon Buri: Burapha University.
Sawetworachote, T. (2017). Integrated Leadership Indicators for Administrators of Secondary Schools under the Jurisdiction Office of the Basic Education Commission. Yanasangworn Research Institute Journal, 8(2), 166-176.
Somphadung, S. (2021). Guidelines for driving the integrated prevention master plan suppress corruption and misconduct for a period of 20 years and the master plan under the national strategy on anti-corruption and misconduct. In the Workshop Integrating Cooperation in Combating Corruption and Misconduct Educational Service Area Office Level Fiscal year 2021 (pp. 6 - 12). Surat Thani: Office of the Basic Education Commission.
Tacq, J. (1997). Multivariate analysis techniques in social science research: From problem to analysis. London: SAGE Publications.
Thammasat University Research and Consulting Center Office. (2020). Project to Evaluate the Success of Project/Activity According to the National Strategy on Prevention and Suppression of Corruption, Phase 3 (2017 -2021) Fiscal year 2020. Nonthaburi: Office of the National Anti-Corruption Commission.
Waranusas, N. (2018). Development of indicators of ethical leadership of school administrators in upright school (Doctoral dissertation). Kamphaeng Phet: Kamphaeng Phet Rajabhat University.
Wattanakul, P., & Loiwirat, T. (2020). Study of the model for creating youth networks to promote values. Honesty and anti-corruption in Maha Sarakham Province. Maha Sarakham: Maha Sarakham Rajabhat University.
Wells, D. D., & Molina, A. D. (2017). The Truth About Honesty. Journal of Public and Nonprofit Affairs, 3(3), 292-308.
Wiratchai, N. (2012). Statistics for use (2nd ed.). Bangkok: Icon Printing.
Wongchinda, T. (2021). OBEC policy and integrated work plan to combat corruption and misconduct, project to enhance morality ethics and good governance in educational institutions (upright school) fiscal year 2021. In the Workshop on integrating Cooperation in Combating Corruption and Misconduct Educational Service Area Office Level Fiscal year 2021 (p. 5). Surat Thani: Office of the Basic Education Commission.
Wongsirisophon, K., Piriyakul, R., & Suwannin, W. (2018). Thai leadership and fairness in the organizational process of Thai cultural management that affects organizational commitment. Journal of Doctoral Studies in Social Sciences, 8(2), 191-203.