GUIDELINES FOR ENHANCING DESIGN THINKING FOR STUDENT TEACHERS
Main Article Content
บทคัดย่อ
The world in the VUCA era is characterized by rapid technological changes, which have significant impacts on all sectors, especially the education sector, which needs to address human development. In the era of VUCA, a new generation of student teachers must be instilled with the qualities of “design thinking” in order to design and develop learning programs that keep up with the changes. This research, thus, aims to 1) assess the need regarding design thinking in student teachers, 2) analyze the process of managing teaching programs under the teacher training curriculum to promote design thinking in student teachers, and 3) develop guidelines for enhancing design thinking in student teachers. The research is divided into 3 stages. The first stage is the analysis and exploration. The research samples comprise a total of 264 student teachers selected from random sampling. The data were obtained using a 5-level rating scale as an assessment tool to measure the qualities of design thinking in student teachers. Then, the needs were analyzed using the Modified Priority Needs Index (PNImodified). The second stage is the analysis of the process of managing teaching programs under the teacher training curriculum by interviewing 8 student teachers. The last stage is the development of guidelines for enhancing design thinking in student teachers by summarizing and analyzing the research findings at each stage and allow the experts to assess the suitability of the guidelines and refine them. The research found the following: 1) student teachers demonstrated the needs to develop the qualities of design thinking in all aspects, with design thinking skills requiring development the most, followed by the design thinking mindset, and 2) the process of managing the teaching programs under the teacher training curriculum, which encompasses the process of managing teaching programs and the process of professional teaching training, did not adequately enhance design thinking in student teachers, and 3) the guidelines for enhancing design thinking in student teachers, namely the 6-point action by the curriculum provider, the 2-point action by the teachers, and the 2-point action by teacher mentors and schools.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
เจ้าของบทความมิได้คัดลอก หรือละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์ของผู้ใด หากเกิดการละเมิดลิขสิทธิ์ ไม่ว่าวิธีใด หรือการฟ้องร้องไม่ว่ากรณีใด ๆ ที่อาจเกิดขึ้นได้ กองบรรณาธิการวารสารศึกษาศาสตร์ ไม่มีส่วนเกี่ยวข้องทั้งสิ้น ให้เป็นสิทธิ์ของเจ้าของบทความที่จะดำเนินการ
References
Anderson, N. (2012). Achieving higher education graduate attributes in the area of creativity, innovation and problem solving through the use of design thinking. In 7th QSApple Conference Proceedings, 7(3), 29–33.
Brenner, W., Uebernickel, F., & Abrell, T. (2016). Design thinking as mindset, process, and toolbox. In W. Brenner, & F. Uebernickel (Eds.). Design Thinking for Innovation. Springer, Cham. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-26100-3_1
Carroll, M. (2014). Shoot for the moon! The mentors and the middle schoolers explore the intersection of design thinking and STEM. Journal of Pre-College Engineering Education Research (J-PEER), 4(1), 14–30.
Chatuporn, P., & Wongwanich, S. (2022). Measurement instrument development and needs assessment of design thinking teachers’ attributes. Journal of Educational Measurement, 39(106), 75-89.
Chesson, D. (2017). Design thinker profile: Creating and validating a scale for measuring design thinking capabilities. Retrieved January 27, 2022, from https://aura.antioch.edu/etds/388
Giles, S. (2018). How VUCA Is Reshaping the Business Environment, and What It Means for Innovation. Retrieved December 27, 2023, from https://www.forbes.com
IDEO. (2012). Design thinking for educators. Retrieved January 10, 2022, from https://designthinkingforeducators.com/toolkit/
Lloyd, P. (2013). Embedded creativity: teaching design thinking via distance education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 23, 749-765. DOI: 10.1007/s10798-012-9214-8
Lor, R. (2017). Design Thinking in Education: A Critical Review of Literature. In International academic conference on social sciences and management/Asian conference on education and psychology. conference proceedings (pp. 37–68). Bangkok, Thailand.
Luka, I. (2014). Design thinking in pedagogy. The Journal of Education, Culture, and Society, 2, 63-74. DOI: 10.15503/jecs20142.63.74
Meyer, M. W., & Norman, D. (2020). Changing design education for the 21st century. The Journal of Design, Economics, and Innovation, 6(1), 13-49.
Nastasi, B. K., & Schensul, S. L. (2005). Contributions of qualitative research to the validity of intervention research, Journal of School Psychology, 43(3), 177-195.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). The Assessment of Reliability. Psychometric Theory, 3, 248-292.
Rauth, I., Köppen, E., Jobst, B., & Meinel, C. (2010). Design thinking: An educational model towards creative confidence. Proceedings of the 1st international conference on design creativity, Japan, 66(2), 1-8.
Rhinow, A., Noweski, C., & Meinel, C. (2012). Transforming constructivist learning into action: Design thinking in education. Design and Technology Education: An International Journal, 17(3), 8-19.
Rojsangrat, P. (2016). Development of an instructional model using design thinking to create thai products identity for undergraduate students (Doctoral dissertation). Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.
Rukspollmuang, C., Pitiyanuwat, S., Maneelek, R., Preedeedilok, F., & Charungkiatikul, S. (2017). The study of state and problems of production, recruitment, and professional development of Thai Basic Education Teachers Related to future needs. Journal of Education Studies, 45(3), 17-33.
Seidel, V. P., Marion, T. J., & Fixson, S. K. (2020). Innovating how to learn design thinking, making, and innovation: incorporating multiple modes in teaching the innovation process. INFORMS Transactions on Education, 20(2), 73-84.
Schweitzer, J., Groeger, L., & Sobel, L. (2016). The design thinking mindset: An assessment of what we know and what we see in practice. Journal of Design, Business & Society, 2(1), 71-94.
World Economic Forum. (2023). Future of Jobs Report. Retrieved January 10, 2023, from https://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Future_of_Jobs_2023.pdf
Wrigley, C., & Straker, K. (2017). Design thinking pedagogy: The educational design ladder. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 54(4), 374-385. DOI: 10.1080/14703297.2015.1108214