DESIGNING SCIENCE LEARNING OUTCOMES THROUGH LEARNING POINTS: LINKING A STANDARDS-BASED CURRICULUM TO A COMPETENCY-BASED CURRICULUM

Main Article Content

Ratchata Apiraknunchai
Nuttaporn Lawthong

Abstract

This article discusses the design of science learning outcomes through learning points to connect a standards-based curriculum to a competency-based curriculum. The study analyzes indicators and core science learning objectives (revision B.E. 2560) derived from the basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551. We propose using indicators and cognitive objectives as tools in a three-step process: (1) Analyzing learning indicators to be used as a starting point in designing learning outcomes that reflect competencies, (2) Identifying attributes across cognitive, psychomotor, and affective domains, and (3) Designing learning outcomes that integrate these three domains in response to challenges in real-life situations. The results indicate that science indicators at the lower secondary level cognitive learning indicators are most prevalent, particularly at the understanding level, while psychomotor and affective domains receive less attention. Therefore, the design of learning indicators should maintain a balance across all three domains, integrating them harmoniously into the learning points process. We propose that effective learning outcome design for competency-based curriculum should balance all three domains harmoniously within the learning points framework. This approach enables teachers to prepare students better to apply their knowledge, develop relevant skills, and cultivate positive character traits, all collectively enhancing their overall competencies and readiness for the future. Moreover, this study presents guidelines and examples of writing learning outcomes in various formats and recommends learning outcomes that serve as starting points for competency assessment integrating knowledge, skills, and attitudes that teachers can practically implement in science classrooms.

Article Details

How to Cite
Apiraknunchai, R., & Lawthong, N. (2025). DESIGNING SCIENCE LEARNING OUTCOMES THROUGH LEARNING POINTS: LINKING A STANDARDS-BASED CURRICULUM TO A COMPETENCY-BASED CURRICULUM. Journal of Education and Innovation, 27(2), 352–366. https://doi.org/10.71185/jeiejournals.v27i2.281063
Section
Academic Articles

References

Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York, NY: Pearson.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Bloom, B. S., Engelhart, M. D., Furst, E. J., Hill, W. H., & Krathwohl, D. R. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives: The classification of educational goals by a committee of college and university examiners. Handbook I: Cognitive domain. New York, NY: Longmans Publishing.

Collaborative for Academic Social and Emotional Learning. (2020). CASEL’s SEL framework. Retrieved from https://casel.org/casel-sel-framework-11-2020/

Drisko, J. W. (2014). Competencies and their assessment. Journal of Social Work Education, 50(3), 414–426. DOI: 10.1080/10437797.2014.917927

Enger, S. K., & Yager, R. E. (2009). Assessing student understanding in science: A standards-based K-12 handbook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.

Gallardo, K. (2020). Competency-based assessment and the use of performance-based evaluation rubrics in higher education: Challenges towards the next decade. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 78(1), 61-79. DOI: 10.33225/pec/20.78.61

Grob, R., Holmeier, M., & Labudde, P. (2017). Formative assessment to support students’ competences in inquiry-based science education. Interdisciplinary Journal of Problem-Based Learning, 11(2). DOI: 10.7771/1541-5015.1673

Hubbard, K. (2024). Plant biology education: A competency‐based vision for the future. Plants, People, Planet, 6(4), 780–790. DOI: 10.1002/ppp3.10503

Institute for the Promotion of Teaching Science and Technology. (2023). Science assessment framework. PISA Thailand. Retrieved from https://drive.google.com/file/d/1j8B6tJamL5CqgB82wrwBlvnQLV9L5G8n/view

Kauertz, A., Neumann, K., & Haertig, H. (2012). Competence in science education. In B. J. Fraser, K. G. Tobin, & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 711-721). Springer. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4020-9041-7_47

Lestari, N. A., Widodo, A., & Eliyawati, E. (2024). Promoting students' anticipatory competency through the rainwater harvesting system learning project. Journal of Science Education Research, 8(1), 106-113. DOI: 10.21831/jser.v8i1.65787

Malagrida, R., Klaassen, P., Ruiz-Mallén, I., & Broerse, J. E. W. (2024). Towards competencies and methods to support responsible research and innovation within STEAM secondary education – The case of Spain. Research in Science & Technological Education, 42(3), 678–698. DOI: 10.1080/02635143.2022.2123790

Malinam, C., & Lawthong, N. (2017). Development of a scientific mind measurement scale for lower secondary school students. An Online Journal of Education, 11(2), 1–15.

Mathelitsch, L. (2013). Competencies in science teaching. Center for Educational Policy Studies Journal, 3(3), 49-64. DOI: 10.26529/cepsj.231

McClarty, K. L., & Gaertner, M. N. (2015). Measuring mastery: Best practices for assessment in competency-based education. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.

McClelland, D. C. (1973). Testing for competence rather than for "intelligence". American Psychologist, 28(1), 1–14. DOI: 10.1037/h0034092

Ministry of Education. (2008). Basic education core curriculum B.E. 2551 (2008). Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Printing House of Thailand.

Ministry of Education. (2017). Indicators and core learning content for science learning area (Revised edition B.E. 2560) according to the Basic Education Core Curriculum B.E. 2551 (1). Bangkok: Agricultural Cooperative Printing House of Thailand.

Ministry of Education. (2021a). 6 core competencies. Retrieved from https://cbethailand.com/หลักสูตร-2/กรอบหลักสูตร/สมรรถนะหลัก-6-ประการ/

Ministry of Education. (2021b). Self-management competency. Retrieved from https://cbethailand.com/หลักสูตร-2/กรอบหลักสูตร/สมรรถนะหลัก-6-ประการ/การจัดการตนเองอย่างมีสติ/

National Research Council. (2012). A framework for K-12 science education: Practices, crosscutting concepts, and core ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Office of the Education Council. (2019). Simple understanding of competency for the public, and simple understanding of competency-based curriculum for teachers, administrators, and educational personnel. Bangkok: 21 Century.

Phongphitaya, K. (2022). Using the OLE model to develop competency-based instruction. Teacher Council Journal, 3(1), 1–13.

Prukpramool, C. (2023). Competency assessment of learners in science learning. Educational Measurement Journal, Mahasarakham University, 29(1), 1–19.

Stanley, T. (2014). Performance-based assessment for 21st-century skills. New York, NY: Routledge.

Vazquez-Espinosa, M., Sancho-Galan, P., Gonzalez-de-Peredo, A. V., Calle, J. L., Ruiz-Rodríguez, A., Fernandez Barbero, G., & Ferreiro-Gonzalez, M. (2024). Enhancing competency-based education in instrumental analysis: A novel approach using high-performance liquid chromatography for real-world problem solving. Education Sciences, 14(5), 461. DOI: 10.3390/educsci14050461

Vazquez-Parra, J. C., Castillo-Martínez, I. M., Ramírez-Montoya, M. S., Amézquita-Zamora, J. A., & Cruz-Sandoval, M. (2023). Gender gap in the perceived mastery of reasoning-for complexity competency: An approach in Latin America. Journal of Applied Research in Higher Education, 16(1), 182–194. DOI: 10.1108/jarhe-11-2022-0355