The Rashomon Effect in the Algorithmic Age: AI-Driven Perceptions of Truth in Social Media

ผู้แต่ง

  • Tananpach Asavasemachai Marketing Communication and Entertainment Business, Faculty of Management Sciences,  Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
  • Pimpilai Thaipitak Marketing Communication and Entertainment Business, Faculty of Management Sciences,  Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
  • Nutt Dechapanya Marketing Communication and Entertainment Business, Faculty of Management Sciences,  Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
  • Sittisak Chanyawut Marketing Communication and Entertainment Business, Faculty of Management Sciences,  Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
  • Jantharat Sirivuttinun Marketing Communication and Entertainment Business, Faculty of Management Sciences,  Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
  • Piarnpilas Piriyaphokanont Marketing Communication and Entertainment Business, Faculty of Management Sciences,  Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University
  • Isara Yingyuad Marketing Communication and Entertainment Business, Faculty of Management Sciences,  Bansomdejchaopraya Rajabhat University

คำสำคัญ:

Rashomon Effect, Artificial Intelligence (AI), Social Media, Perception of Truth

บทคัดย่อ

        This study analyzes the “Rashomon Effect” in the digital age, focusing on the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) mechanisms in social media platforms on users’ perceptions of “truth.” The main objective is to understand the structure of algorithmic systems, the patterns of user perception under algorithmically curated content, and the resulting socio-cultural impacts. This research employs qualitative content analysis, conducted during January–April 2025, using purposive sampling of content from Facebook, YouTube, and Twitter (X) relating to two notable events: the 2024 controversy involving South Korean actor Kim Soo-hyun, and the political and social movements led by Thailand’s “Free Youth” protest group. The content types included public posts, video clips, comments, and shared articles. Units of analysis were individual posts and their engagement patterns. The findings reveal that AI plays a significant role in filtering and ranking information based on users’ behavior and interests. This process reinforces selective exposure, fosters the creation of echo chambers and filter bubbles, and leads users to adopt personalized versions of truth without questioning the underlying algorithmic logic. Consequently, the Rashomon Effect is amplified at a structural level, resulting in a diminished diversity of perspectives, difficulty in achieving social consensus, and increased vulnerability to misinformation. The study emphasizes the urgent need to promote both media literacy and AI literacy, enabling users to critically engage with content in an era where truth is algorithmically constructed.

เอกสารอ้างอิง

BBC News Thai. (2020). The path of the Free Youth movement: From students to challenging the monarchy. https://www.bbc.com/thai/thailand-54741254

Bucher, T. (2018). If... then: Algorithmic power and politics. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001

Couldry, N., & Hepp, A. (2017). The mediated construction of reality. Polity Press.

East Asia Forum. (2021). Thai youth’s struggle for democracy may fizzle but political contention continues. https://eastasiaforum.org/2021/05/11/thai-youths-struggle-for-de mocracy-may-fizzle-but-political-contention-continues/

Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie, P. J. Boczkowski, & K. A. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society (pp. 167–194). MIT Press.

Heider, K. G. (1988). The Rashomon effect: When ethnographers disagree. American Anthropologist, 90(1), 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1988.90.1.02a00050

iLaw. (2021). Overview of the 2020–2021 protest movement. https://www.ilaw.or.th/articles/10090

Iyengar, S., & Hahn, K. S. (2009). Red media, blue media: Evidence of political selective exposure. Journal of Communication, 59(1), 19–39. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.01402.x

Kanin, F., & Kanin, M. (1959). Rashomon. Random House.

Kurosawa, A. (Director). (1950). Rashomon [Film]. Daiei Film.

MISS_K_DRAMA. (2024). Kim Soo Hyun’s dark secrets: How the media is protecting him [Video].YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bh2wHTxnSmY

Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.

Schacter, D. L. (1995). Memory distortion: How minds, brains, and societies reconstruct the past. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 2(4), 193–204.

Schreier, M. (2012). Qualitative content analysis in practice. SAGE Publications.

Stroud, N. J. (2008). Media use and political predispositions: Revisiting the concept of selective exposure. Political Behavior, 30(3), 341–366.

Sunstein, C. R. (2017). #Republic: Divided democracy in the age of social media. Princeton University Press.

Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

Thairath Plus. (2020). The Free Youth–Thammasat protest and its impact on the government. https://plus.thairath.co.th/topic/speak/100117

Tufekci, Z. (2015). Algorithmic harms beyond corrections: Directed attention, behavioral amplification, and prediction. Keynote Lecture to the ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing. https://scholar.law.colorado.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1192&context=ctlj

ดาวน์โหลด

เผยแพร่แล้ว

2026-04-30