Organizational Management Amid the Dynamics of Social and Technological Change in the 21st Century
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aims to analyze organizational management within the context of social and technological transformations in the 21st century. In this era, organizations face multifaceted and rapid dynamics driven by globalization, exponential growth in digital technologies, and structural shifts in society, such as ageing populations, cultural diversity, and rising expectations regarding corporate social responsibility. The article presents contemporary frameworks for managing change, such as Kotter's Dual Operating System and Gibbons' behavioral management model, as responses to these evolving conditions. It also examines case studies from Thailand, Asia, and the United States, highlighting how organizations across business, government, and civil society sectors have adapted to these changes. In addition, the article explores the impact of emerging technologies such as Artificial Intelligence (AI), the Internet of Things (IoT), and cloud computing on organizational management processes. It proposes strategic adjustments, leadership development, and the establishment of flexible and sustainable organizational cultures to ensure long-term survival and growth amid uncertainty. The article emphasizes the critical importance of integrating technology with social values and visionary leadership as central elements in managing organizations effectively in the 21st century. Readers will benefit from understanding key transformation trends in today's context and will be equipped to apply the proposed frameworks and practices to strengthen their organizations. This includes systematically assessing their organization's capacity for change and selecting suitable strategies to navigate and lead effectively in the digital age.
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
บทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์เป็นลิขสิทธิ์ของวารสาร มจร ปรัชญาปริทรรศน์
ข้อความในบทความที่ได้รับการตีพิมพ์ในวารสาร ถือเป็นความรับผิดชอบของผู้เขียนบทความ และข้อคิดเห็นนั้นไม่ถือว่าเป็นทัศนะและความรับผิดชอบของกองบรรณาธิการวารสาร มจร ปรัชญาปริทรรศน์
References
สำนักงานสภาพัฒนาการเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ. (2564). แผนพัฒนาเศรษฐกิจและสังคมแห่งชาติ ฉบับที่ 13 (พ.ศ. 2566–2570). สืบค้นข้อมูลเมื่อวันที่ 10 พฤษภาคม 2568 จาก https://www.nesdc.go.th
สำนักงานสถิติแห่งชาติ. (2566). สถิติประชากรและเคหะ พ.ศ. 2566. สืบค้นข้อมูลเมื่อวันที่ 10 พฤษภาคม 2568 จาก https://stat.bora.dopa.go.th
Thomas, D. A., and Ely, R. J. (1996). Making differences matter: A new paradigm for managing diversity. Harvard Business Review, 74(5), 79–90.
Gibbons, P. (2019). The Science of Organizational Change: How Leaders Set Strategy, Change Behavior, and Create an Agile Culture (2nd ed.). Pearson Education. Retrieved [2025, May 10] Amazon Kindle Edition https://www.amazon.com/Science-Organizational-Change-Strategy-Behavior-ebook/dp/B07QL2M9GK
Georgescu, I., et al. (2024). Enhancing Organizational Resilience: The Transformative Influence of Strategic Human Resource Management Practices and Organizational Culture. Sustainability, 16(10), 4315.
Kotter, J. P. (2014). Accelerate: Building Strategic Agility for a Faster-Moving World. Harvard Business Review Press. Retrieved [2025, May 10] https://hbr.org/2012/11/accelerate
Knight, W. (2020). Companies Are Rushing to Use AI-but Few See a Payoff. Retrieved [2025, May 10] https://www.wired.com/story/companies-rushing-use-ai-few-see-payoff/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
Lai, F. Y., et al. (2020). Transformational leadership and job performance: The mediating role of work engagement. SAGE Open, Retrieved [2025, May 10] https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244019899085
Manyika, J., and Tuin, M. (2020). The future is not what it used to be: Resilience in the era of uncertainty. McKinsey Global Institute. Retrieved [2025, May 10] https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/leadership/the-future-is-not-what-it-used-to-be-thoughts-on-the-shape-of-the-next-normal
OECD. (2020), “The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six dimensions of a Digital Government”, OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 02, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved [2025, May 10] https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2020/10/the-oecd-digital-government-policy-framework_11dd6aa8/f64fed2a-en.pdf
Harris, P. G. (2022). Routledge Handbook of Global Environmental Politics. Retrieved [2025, May 10] https://api.taylorfrancis.com/content/chapters/oa-edit/download?identifierName=doi&identifierValue=10.4324%2F9781003008873-23&type=chapterpdf&utm_source=chatgpt.com
Porter, M. E., and Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
Schwab, K. (2015). The Fourth Industrial Revolution: What It Means and How to Resp ond. Retrieved [2025, May 10] https://www.foreignaffairs.com/articles/2015-12-12/fourth-industrial-revolution
Tanapaisankit, C., et al. (2024). Digital transformation strategies for Thai SMEs: Case studies in the post-COVID era. Journal of Asian Business Innovation, 12(1), 45–67.
Tongdaeng, T., and Mahakanjana, C. (2022). LiVEx and access to capital for Thai SMEs: Innovation in equity markets. Journal of Capital Markets, 18(3), 22–39.